Tim Henman Clashes With McEnroe Over Wimbledon Points Ban - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Grand Slam

Tim Henman Clashes With McEnroe Over Wimbledon Points Ban

After an awkward exchange on live TV, Henman was unaware that an off-air conversation he was having with Eurosport host Barbara Schett was also being broadcasted.



A ball going over the net during the match between Andy Murray (GBR) and Milos Raonic (CAN) in the Gentlemen’s Singles final on Centre Court. The Championships 2016 at The All England Lawn Tennis Club, Wimbledon. Day 13 Sunday 10/07/2016. AELTC/Bob Martin

Following Naomi Osaka’s revelation that she may not play at this year’s Wimbledon Championships, Tim Henman found himself in a tense argument with John McEnroe during a live discussion on Eurosport UK.

The four-time Grand Slam champion is the biggest name to date to hint that she may not play in the grass-court major following the decision to remove points from the tournament. This year Wimbledon has banned Russian and Belarussian athletes from playing due to the Ukrainian war. A decision which has prompted anger from other governing bodies of the sport who argue it is unfair to ban a group of players due to their nationality. It is feared that other players might follow the same path as Osaka in the coming months.

Henman, who is a member of the All England Tennis Club board, played down any potential significance over Osaka’s latest comment. Insisting that he believes a ‘vast majority’ of players will still participate in the Grand Slam.

“At the end of the day she is speaking for herself. I think the vast majority of players would look at the opportunity of playing at Wimbledon, the history and prestige of the event,” Henman said during the live broadcast.
“For a top player like Naomi, she is capable of winning any tournament she plays, so the idea of her having the opportunity of potentially winning the Wimbledon title and then turning that down I was certainly surprised to hear that. That’s her prerogative.”

However, the former British No.1 found himself under further pressure on air after McEnroe blasted the ban and even endorsed the possibility of a player boycott should they want to. Something which has only ever happened once in the Open Era back in 1973. That occured when the recently formed Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) stated that none should compete if Nikola Pilic was not allowed to compete. Pilic was banned from the event by his national federation for allegedly refusing to play in a Davis Cup tie.

“I think it was a mistake by Wimbledon to do what they did in the first place. Kicking out the Russians and the Balarussians. I don’t know how they came up with the Belarussians too, but that’s a whole other story,” McEnroe commented.
“Then in my opinion it is compounded by the fact the ATP and WTA says there are no points. I don’t see how that helps the players. If the players really believe Wimbledon made a big mistake they should boycott the tournament.”

The reason why Belarussian players are banned from Wimbledon is due to their country’s support of Russia in the war. This is why on the ITF, WTA and ATP Tour’s they are only allowed to compete as neutral athletes like their Russian counterparts.

Henman continued to defend Wimbledon’s decision making but conceded that it was a lose-lose situation for all of those involved. There was previous talk of allowing players to participate if they signed documents condemning the actions of their government. However, this proposal never materialized due to safety concerts over players and their families.

“The reality of this situation for the championships, players and the Tour’s is that there are no winners. I feel enormous sympathy for the Russian and Belorussian players that cannot play,” he said.
“When you go through the circumstances that were presented for Wimbledon. The directive from the government is players are not allowed to play as neutral athletes as it has been on the Tour. The question in return is Wimbledon expected to turn around and say to the Government ‘actually we think we know better and we are going to do something different?’ That’s not going to happen.”

The debate between the two ended due to Novak Djokovic’s first round match starting. However, there was a blip during the warm-up when Henman’s microphone was accidentally kept on and a private conversation between him and Eurosport host Barbara Schett was broadcasted.

Henman: That’s it, I’m not talking about Wimbledon again!
Schette: He (McEnroe) brought it (Wimbledon points ban) up, actually I brought it up. Osaka brought it up, but Jesus, not easy for you.
Henman: That’s allright
Schette: I think that’s enough. Maybe we have to do it one more time with Christ (Evert)?

It was a tough day at the office for Henman to say the least.

Grand Slam

Australian Open Considering Switching Women’s Final To Sunday In Future



The Australian Open could become the first Grand Slam to break away from the tradition of women playing their singles final first. 

According to a report from the Australian Associated Press, tournament chief Craig Tiley is open to making such a move which wouldn’t require any approval from either the WTA or ATP. However, they would likely need to consult with players first and no changes are set to be made in 2025. 

The reasoning for making such a change is due to the women’s final usually being shorter than the men’s best with it being a best-of-three set match. Compared to the men who play the best-of-five. Their thinking is that due to the length of men’s matches increasing in recent years, staging it on a Saturday would enable more people to watch the entire match compred to a Sunday when many are consious about staying up late due to the working week starting on Monday. 

This year’s Australian Open saw Jannik Sinner bounce back from two sets down to beat Daniil Medvedev in a epic encounter that lasted three hours and 46 minuites. Meanwhile, Aryna Sabalenka required an hour and 17 mnuites to beat China’s Qinwen Zheng and capture the title. 

Should such a switch take place, it is estimated that the Sunday finale would end at around 10:30pm local time instead of after midnight, which would make it more appealing to fans. Furthermore, it could throw the women’s final more into the spotlight. 

However, there will be obstacles that need to be addressed. The most significant for the Australian Open will be trying to ensure that their 48-hour recovery period between best-of-five-set men’s matches will still be followed. 

This year was the first time in history that the Melbourne major took place over 15 days with play starting on a Sunday. Organisers claimed that the move was done in order to prevent the number of late-night finishes. However, it has little effect on any matches that took place after the first round. 

It is throught that now the event is held over 15 days, it gives more room for organisers to schedule the men’s final for a Saturday. The proposal was discussed during this year’s Australian Open’s official debrief. 

Continue Reading

Grand Slam

It Wasn’t The Same Old Story On Sunday Down Under

Jannik Sinner won his first Grand Slam title on Sunday.



(@janniksin - Twitter)

It’s been the same old story at the Australian Open for a long time in the men’s game.

One of the greats almost always would take the top prize Down Under. Either Novak Djokovic, Rafa Nadal, Roger Federer or even Stan Wawrinka always prevailed since 2006 at Melbourne.

And then came Jannik Sinner in 2024.

None of the other superstars were still around for Sunday’s final.


Yes, this time it was a different Australian Open.

But actually Sinner may have written his own story when he upended Djokovic in the semifinals. Without that experience, the slender Italian may not have been able to handle the pressure that Daniil Medvedev sent his way in the final.

Sinner was ready for the finish line after shocking Djokovic in the semifinals. It just took time to get there.

Sinner played within himself most of the last three sets of the final. A first-time Grand Slam finalist, Sinner played as if he belonged there in those three sets.

But, oh, those first two sets when Medvedev dominated play with his backhand from the middle of the court. Backhands usually are reserved for the backhand side of the court, but not with the tall Russian on the court.


In a similar manner as women’s champion Aryna Sabalenka, Sinner followed up a big semifinal win with his own Australian Open title. Only, Sinner had to fight for five sets to accomplish his dream Down Under with a 3-6, 3-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-3 victory over Medvedev.

Sinner appeared to play far differently from his victory over Djokovic when he controlled the court with his aggressive play and power.

This time, Sinner started things conservatively with few aggressive winners, repeatedly leaving the corners wide open for Medvedev’s crafty, but hard hit strokes. Medvedev made Sinner  pay a price with a style of play that was just the opposite.

Medvedev played close to the baseline and aggressively hopped on balls with his backhand in whip-lash fashion. He hardly had to move as he conserved energy.


Medvedev’s strategy worked like a charm until Sinner served the ninth game of the third set as Medvedev once needed only six points for a possible Grand Slam title. Sinner managed to overcome a deuce score to win that game.

Medvedev fell behind 30-0 serving the 10th game of the set and then Sinner got his first set point. Sinner made it stand up and it was a new game after that.

Sinner didn’t appear to be ready for Medvedev’s game the first two sets, but the Italian then came alive. He became prepared for Medvedev, even after losing the first two sets.

Of course, Sabalenka got her boost from a surprising, but solid win over talented Coco Graff in the women’s semifinals. Sabalenka then was never really challenged by Qinwen Zheng in the final.

Sinner’s final was much different.  He was somewhat lucky to escape with  a win.

Medvedev almost wrapped up the title in the ninth game, but it didn’t happen. As a result, Sinner may have started his own success story in Grand Slam finals.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award  for print media. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com.

Continue Reading


Australian Open Daily Preview: Daniil Medvedev Plays Jannik Sinner for the Men’s Singles Championship



Daniil Medvedev during Friday’s semifinals (twitter.com/AustralianOpen)

The men’s singles and women’s doubles championship matches are on Sunday in Melbourne.

Across the last 10 hard court Majors, Daniil Medvedev has now advanced to six championship matches, half of which have come in Melbourne.  In those finals, Medvedev is a meek 1-4.  However, this is the first time Medvedev is looking across the net at a man not named Rafael Nadal or Novak Djokovic, the two winningest male singles players of all-time at Grand Slam events.

And Medvedev can thank Jannik Sinner for that, who for the third time in their last four meetings, defeated Djokovic in Friday’s semifinals to reach his first Major final.  Since adding Darren Cahill to his team 18 months ago, one of tennis’s best coaches of all-time, Sinner’s game has continually and significantly improved, most evident in his three victories over Djokovic since November.  On Sunday, the most dominant male player of this fortnight looks to break more new ground in his young career.

Earlier on Sunday, in the women’s doubles championship match, it’s Lyudmyla Kichenok and Jelena Ostapenko (11) vs. Su-Wei Hsieh and Elise Mertens (2).  This is a first Major final for Kichenok, and a first in doubles for Ostapenko.  Su-Wei has won seven Majors in doubles, including her first mixed title earlier this week, and is 7-1 at this stage of Majors.  Mertens has won three Majors in women’s doubles, including Wimbledon in 2021 alongside Su-Wei.

Jannik Sinner (4) vs. Daniil Medvedev (3) – Not Before 7:30pm on Rod Laver Arena

Through six rounds, Sinner has dropped just one of 19 sets, which came against Djokovic in the semis.  But even that match was a rather comfortable win for the Italian, who lost only six games in the three sets he claimed.  Jannik has not just been the best ATP player this fortnight: he’s been the best ATP player since the last Major, with a record of 26-2.  The 22-year-old is 10-4 in ATP finals, with this of course being by far the biggest of his career to date.

Medvedev endured a much more complicated path to this final, completing 25 out of a possible 30 sets, which included three five-setters.  Two of those came in the last two rounds, against Hubert Hurkacz and Sascha Zverev.  Daniil has spent six more hours on court than Jannik, and has played for over 11 hours during the second week alone.  He is 20-16 in ATP Finals, with all 20 titles coming at different events.  But Medvedev can be rather streaky in finals: after losing five in a row, he won seven of eight, yet has now lost his last three.

And those last two losses came at the hands of Sinner, who beat him in both Beijing and Vienna.  Jannik also defeated Daniil in the semifinals of the ATP Finals in November, though all three of those recent matches were tight.  Prior to that, Medvedev had dominated their head-to-head 6-0, which includes two finals earlier in 2023.  All ten of their meetings have taken place on hard courts, and this is their first at a Major.

Based on their recent history, as well as their individual form this fortnight, I favor Sinner to win his first Major on Sunday.  While he’ll surely be nervous in the biggest match of his life, and could experience an emotional letdown coming off ending Novak’s undefeated record of 20-0 in Australian Open semis and finals, Jannik will be the much fresher player on this day.  Plus, he will feel confident after those three recent wins over Daniil, who has a lot of scar tissue to overcome in Major finals.  And after facing Medvedev so much within the past year, Sinner is well-versed on how to take advantage of Daniil’s deep return position.

Sunday’s full Order of Play is here.

Continue Reading