Calls For Players' Union Hampered By Opposition From Federer and Nadal, Says Pospisil - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

ATP

Calls For Players’ Union Hampered By Opposition From Federer and Nadal, Says Pospisil

The Canadian tennis star has said the two tennis stars failed to back the initiative as he also criticised Nick Kyrgios over his recent comments concerning a potential merger in the sport.

Avatar

Published

on

An initiative backed by Novak Djokovic failed to gain momentum after two of the biggest names of men’s tennis failed to get behind it, according to Vasek Pospisil.

 

The world No.93 said up to 80 players in the top 100 on the ATP Tour were in favor of a motion to form an independent union to support their rights. A topic that has been debated in the sport for many months with nothing coming to fruition as of yet. One of the main driving forces behind the calls is that player’s want a greater share of revenue generated from the four grand slam tournaments. Despite rises in prize money, the share still works out at roughly 10%.

Pospisil has been one of the biggest supporters of unionisation. Writing an article for The Globe and Mail last year, he argues that such a move would ‘restore fairness and transparency.’ In a recent interview with TSN, the Canadian said 12 out of the world’s top 20 backed the motion. Although two top names of the sport failed to get behind the proposal.

“Tennis is extremely International. So unionizing players is not that easy because you have all these conflicting labor laws from different countries. It’s a very tricky, difficult scenario. But when I got injured last year I tried to have a crack at it. We are definitely closer than ever. We are definitely more unified than ever before,” Pospisil said in an interview with TSN.
“Novak was sort of it from the get-go. At one point we were 80 of the top 100 male players signed onto the engagement letter, Novak being one of them. I had like 12 of the top 20, but when we went with Roger and Rafa they were not in favor.”
“Actually, they just wanted to go themselves and talk to the Grand Slams, which is something that went against the gist of what we were trying to do. It’s a shame, to be honest,” he added.

Both Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal rejoined the ATP player’s council last August in a bid to reunite the men’s tour following various disagreements. Including the decision to move Chris Kermode last year which divided opinion. The council is headed by Djokovic with Pospisil also being a long-time member.

“I’ve had some great chats with Roger. I like him a lot, he is a great guy,” said Pospisil. “He was totally in support of the concept and agrees with a lot of the issues but ultimately didn’t get behind the actual movement which slowed it down a little bit for sure.’
“At the end of the day it’s the mass of players that is more powerful than a couple. You can’t just have two guys playing an exhibition every event. That’s not going to carry tennis very far.”

Despite his criticism, Pospisil has insisted that the Big Three ‘work really well’ on the council together. Although he admits that each of them have ‘very big personalities.’ He also hailed Djokovic for his leadership and commitment to the sport. The Serbian has been the president since 2016.

The Players’ council issue advisory decisions to the ATP board of directors and members are elected by their peers.

‘Kyrgios hasn’t got the information’

Elsewhere in his interview with TSN, Pospisil has also taken aim at Nick Kyrgios after the Australian recently voiced his opposition to the idea of the ATP and WTA Tour’s being merged. Support for a merger has surged in recent weeks following a tweet from Federer that backed the initiative. Andrea Gaudenzi, who is the chairman of the ATP, had already been in talks with the WTA about working closely together in the future.

“Did anyone ask the majority of the ATP what they think about merging with the WTA and how it is good for us?” Kyrgios wrote on Twitter.
“We shouldn’t merge.” He later added.

Questioned about Kyrgios’ view, Pospisil said the Australian was in no position to comment because he didn’t know the full facts of what was going on. Talks are ongoing behind closed doors and it is unclear as to if or when any collaboration may occur.

“You know what, it’s because a lot of players express, or people in general, will express an opinion without having any information, just because they feel like they want to say something,” he said.
“That might be the case with Nick.
“To be honest, he’s in no position to express an opinion when he just hears about this for the first time and has done zero due diligence.
“There are some guys like that and I’ll have no problem telling him that to his face.”

Earlier this week WTA boss Steve Simon told The New York Times that a merger would ‘make all the sense in the world.’ Although he rules out the concept of an acquisition taking place. Should such a move take place, it will likely take a considerable amount of time due to the complexity of the process.

At present there are seven governing bodies of tennis. Besides the men’s and women’s tours, there are also the ITF and a board for each of the four grand slams.

Pospisil’s full interview with TSN can be watched below

ATP

Andy Murray Fights Back To Reach First ATP Final In 27 Months

The Brit was in impressive form against America’s Reilly Opelka.

Avatar

Published

on

Andy Murray (GBR) AELTC/Simon Bruty

Former world No.1 Andy Murray is on the verge of re-entering the world’s top 100 after battling into his first Tour final since 2019 at the Sydney International on Friday.

 

The three-time Grand Slam champion recovered from a set down to beat Reilly Opelka 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 in a marathon clash which lasted almost two-and-a-half hours. Murray, who is currently ranked 110 places lower than his American opponent, faced just one break point in the match which he saved. Impressively the Brit produced 16 aces and won 88% of his first service points. After dropping the opening tiebreak, he managed to turn the match around in his favour by breaking Opelka once in each of the next two sets.

“I love competing. You want to try to finish the matches if you can but I lost a tight first set and not easy to come back against someone who serves like that. I kept fighting… and managed to get the win,” said Murray who produced just 10 unforced errors.

It is the second time this week Murray has beaten a seeded player in Sydney after edging out second seed Nikoloz Basilashvili in three sets. He also beat eighth seed David Goffin in the quarter-finals who was forced to retire whilst trailing 6-2 due to injury.

The 34-year-old has reached his first Tour final since winning the 2019 European Open when he defeated Stan Wawrinka. He now has a shot at claiming his 48th ATP title on Saturday where he will play either compatriot Dan Evans or Aslan Karatsev.

“It would be amazing to start the year with a win,” he said. “It’s been a great week for me, great progress against anything I’ve done in the past year. I’ll go for 47 tomorrow. It’s been a good week. I’ve played better with each match.”

It has been two years since Murray last played a tournament on Australian soil. Back then he was facing the prospect of having to retire from the sport due to a serious hip injury but later received resurfacing surgery which has enabled him to continue playing. Murray now plays with a metal rod inserted into his hip.

Should he prevail in Saturday’s final, Murray will crack the top 100 for the first time since May 2018.

Continue Reading

ATP

Bernard Tomic Tells Umpire He Thinks He Has Covid During Australian Open Qualifying Match

The tennis player says he is ‘really sick’ after crashing out of the tournament.

Avatar

Published

on

Bernard Tomic (image via https://twitter.com/rnadalacademy)

Bernard Tomic has taken a swipe at Australian Open officials over their testing system for COVID-19.

 

The former top 20 player crashed out in the first round of the qualifying tournament to Roman Safiullin, who impressed many during the ATP Cup last week. Tomic was on the court for less than an hour as he lost 6-1, 6-4. This was the first match he had played since September 2021.

During the second set of his clash with Safiullin, the 29-year-old was heard telling umpire Aline Da Rocha Nocinto that he believes he has COVID-19. Saying he would ‘buy her a meal’ if he was wrong.

“I’m sure in the next two days I will test positive, I’m telling you,” he said.
“I’ll buy you dinner if I don’t test positive in three days, otherwise you buy me dinner.”

Venting his frustration, Tomic said he was shocked that no official PCR tests are required for players, just rapid tests. However, Tennis Australia later clarified that all players must complete a PCR test before participating in the tournament and their result must be negative in order to play.

“They’re allowing players to come on court with rapid tests in their room, c’mon … no official PCR testing,” he continued.

Following the match Tomic posted an update on his Instagram account saying that he is currently feeling ‘really sick’ and has been asked by doctors to isolate in his room. During the match he did have a medical time out and was seen checking for his own pulse.

“Feeling really sick, I’m now back in my hotel room,” Tomic wrote.
“Just spoke to the doctors on site and they’ve asked me to isolate. They couldn’t treat me yet to avoid contact.
“Thank you for all the support on the court today. I really appreciate it! I’ll do better next time.
“Very disappointed as I really wanted to make Aussies proud and perform well on my home turf.”

Tomic has not commented on why he decided to play his match if he believed he could have covid. It is also unclear as to what symptoms he experienced leading up to today or the severity of them.

In a separate development, Portugal’s Nuno Borges was forced to pull out of the qualifying draw after he tested positive for COVID-19.

Continue Reading

ATP

Eight Questions For Novak Djokovic

So far Djokovic has been anything but transparent. His positive COVID-19 result was made known by the lawyers, not him. He trusted Craig Tiley’s assurances that he misinformed him. Here are the questions we would ask him.

Avatar

Published

on

By

Novak Djokovic at the 2021 Rolex Paris Masters (Credit: Roberto Dell'Olivo)

By Roberto Ferri

For several weeks the troubled events relating Novak Djokovic and his participation in the Australian Open have been taking place.

 

For the few who still do not know them, I will summarize them briefly.

In order to take part in the 2022 edition of the Australian Open it is necessary to have completed the vaccination cycle against Covid-19 or, alternatively, to have requested from the competent local medical authorities a certificate of exemption.

On January 4, Djokovic announced in a post that he had obtained medical exemption and was on his way to Australia. Some may say it was kind of naive post, but it’s hard to believe that it was his responsibility to check consistency between the exemption that had got and the Australian federal laws.

Before his arrival at the Melbourne airport, the Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison – perhaps under the pressure of a large part of national and international public opinion who had immediately expressed their discontent with this concession – declared: “Djokovic will be sent home on the first plane if he is unable to provide sufficient evidence to support his exemption from vaccination ”.

Djokovic arrived in Melbourne on January 5th but his visa to enter the country is rejected by the border authorities.

Tension rose between Australia and Serbia with the Serbian government summoning the Australian ambassador.

Djokovic’s lawyers are appealing against the visa refusal; the judge in charge of examining the appeal reserves the right to make a decision on Monday 10th January.

While awaiting the sentence, Djokovic is accompanied to a hotel of the lowest level; many fans of the champion gather in front of the hotel to protest in his favour.

In Serbia, Djokovic’s father made a series of statements in which he compares his son to Spartacus and Jesus, we assume not necessarily in this order of importance.

In the meantime, through the papers supporting the appeal filed with the Melbourne court, we learn that Djokovic had requested an exemption because he recently recovered from COVID and that he had obtained it from the Medical Director of Tennis Australia on December 30th. In the same documents we read that Djokovic’s positivity to COVID was ascertained through a molecular test carried out on December 16th.

If we (UbiTennis) had the chance, I would like to put these eight 8 questions to the Serbian champion:

1- The documents filed by your lawyers state that on December 16th you took the test for COVID 19. Why did you take it that very day?

2- On what day did you know your test result?

3- In this circumstance you considered it appropriate not to publicly reveal your positive result unlike what you did in June 2020. Why?

4- Between the day you learned about your positivity and the following days did you take part in public events?

5- If you took part in public events, what precautions did you take to avoid transmitting the infection?

6- When you arrived at Melbourne airport did you have complete documentation that provided all the evidence supporting the exemption?

7- If you had not contracted COVID you would have not been able to apply for vaccine exemption; what alternative strategy did you plan to participate to the Australian Open?

8- Would you get vaccinated if it were the only option to be able to take part in ATP and ITF tournaments during 2022?

Is Novak Djokovic going to answer them?

Only time will tell.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending