Ramos Was Right In Serena’s Controversy! Osaka, What A Champion - UBITENNIS
Connect with us


Ramos Was Right In Serena’s Controversy! Osaka, What A Champion

Serena Williams lost her mind like in her previous matches with Clijsters and Stosur. Naomi Osaka is a truly deserving champion. We have 8 different winners in the last 8 Grand Slams for the first time in 80 years.




FLUSHING MEADOWS – What a mess Serena Williams made! Unreal! Williams’ outbursts during this year’s US Open final were extremely disappointing, especially coming from a player with her experience. Since becoming a mother last year, Williams has been very open and vocal about how she wants to be a role-model for her daughter Alexis Olympia.  Serena’s behavior during the championship match and her words in her post-match press conference – during which she tried to act like a defender of women’s rights claiming that chair umpire Carlos Ramos would have never inflicted such warnings and penalties on a male player – certainly raised many eyebrows.


First and foremost, we must give credit where credit is due. Naomi Osaka deserved to win her first Grand Slam title against her idol, who is 16 years and 20 days older than she is. The Japanese rising star dominated the first set and kept her composure in the second when Serena was kicking and screaming after receiving three unquestionable warnings from the chair umpire. Serena first received a warning for coaching in the second game of the second set, as Ramos saw Serena’s coach Patrick Mouratoglou giving her signals from the stands. After the incident occurred, Mouratouglou couldn’t deny that he was trying to coach his player and publicly admitted it on Twitter. Was it necessary to do it? His statement certainly surprised Serena, who is probably livid with him. Will he now get fired?

Perhaps when Serena watches the video of the match, she will see how Mouratoglou was clearly trying to give her signals about moving forward in the court and attacking. Up until that point in the match, Williams was being outplayed from the baseline by her younger opponent. Serena said that she wasn’t even looking at her coach when the incident happened, but it is fair to say that Patrick did try to coach her. Perhaps Carlos Ramos was a little too strict in applying the rule to the letter, as both Williams’ sisters don’t even use on-court coaching in regular tour events where players are allowed to receive coaching visits during the match. It was probably a spontaneous initiative of Mouratoglou, who sometimes likes to be at the center of attention. Truth be told, he simply did what many coaches do in different ways and with different signals. He later claimed that all the coaches use signals to advise their players during matches and never get punished, including Toni Nadal.

As soon as Serena received the warning for coaching, she started with her first outburst towards the chair umpire: “I don’t cheat to win, I’d rather lose. I want you to know that”. She also asked him to remove the violation from her conduct, but Ramos was far from being intimidated by her words. It never happened that a chair umpire would give a warning to a player and then remove it. It is the chair umpire’s job to apply the rules and make sure that players respect them.

Whether Serena saw Patrick’s signal or not, the first incident of the match actually gave her an energy boost as she certainly started to move forward and play more aggressive. Osaka started showing a few nerves and Williams jumped to a 3-1 lead in the second set, while Arthur Ashe Stadium almost turned into a jungle with fans cheering and screaming for Serena.

The following game proved to be a disaster for Williams, as she double faulted twice and missed an easy backhand. Serena furiously smashed and broke her racquet, which triggered a second warning from the umpire: This time it was for racquet abuse. Since this was Williams’ second violation, it resulted into a penalty point. As Osaka was walking back to the service line, the chair umpire announced 15-0. Many spectators seemed to be confused about what happened. Serena started screaming at the umpire again: “You owe me an apology. I have never cheated in my life. I have a daughter and I stand for what’s right for her. I’ve never cheated, and you owe me an apology. You will never do another one of my matches”. Then she became even more aggressive towards him: “You are a liar and now you stole a point from me. You’re a thief”. At that point, Carlos Ramos issued a third warning towards Williams for word abuse, which resulted in a game penalty. Serena completely lost her mind as the crowd was loudly booing the chair umpire. The noise level was insane. Serena then called the referee Brian Earlie and the supervisor Donna Kelso, but she accomplished very little. Both the referee and supervisor could only stand by the umpire’s decisions.

Down 5-3, Serena managed to regroup and hold her serve, forcing Osaka to serve out the match. It was very remarkable how the young Japanese was able to keep her focus in the middle of such bizarre events, closing out the match with a great serve that Williams couldn’t get back.

“The spectators were making so much noise that I didn’t hear any of the conversations between Serena and the umpire. When the umpire announced the score at 5-3, I was a little confused, but I kept telling myself to stay focused. She is such a great champion and I thought that she could have come back into the match at any time”, Osaka said in her post-match press conference.

Williams accused Ramos of sexism while talking to the press after the match. Quite frankly, those accusations were ridiculous and inappropriate, and should have not been acknowledged by the press. Instead, a few idiots applauded Williams for her words.

Even if I want to give credit to Serena for regrouping and controlling her emotions during the trophy presentation, I don’t agree with her behavior. Perhaps the chair umpire was a little too strict when he gave her the first warning, but the second and third were absolutely on point. Serena lost her cool for the third time at the US Open after her previous incidents with chair umpires in the 2011 final against Stosur and the 2009 semifinal against Kim Clijsters. The best player on the court wasn’t Serena Williams, it was Naomi Osaka.

Osaka played with the class of a true champion. At 20 years of age, it is safe to say that she will win many more titles in the future. She has a great personality on and off the court and a remarkable sense of humor.

(Article translation provided by T&L Global – Translation & Language Solutions – www.t-lglobal.com )


Does WTA Need A Top Rivalry To Drive The Sport?

Iga Swiatek is the WTA’s dominant world number one but does she need a rival in order to drive the sport to new heights.




Iga Swiatek (@TennisHandshake - Twitter)

The WTA has a dominant world number one and a variety of talented players on the tour but the one thing it’s lacking at the moment is a top rivalry.


First of all it was supposed to be Bianca Andreescu and Naomi Osaka, then Ash Barty and Osaka and also Barty and Iga Swiatek.

However none of these match-ups created a top rivalry over a long period to generate an overwhelming amount of interest.

After Barty’s shock retirement, many people were left disappointed at the fact that her and current dominant world number one Iga Swiatek could not compete for the sport’s biggest titles in a fierce rivalry.

Now Swiatek sits at the top of the WTA rankings with almost a 4,000 point lead at the top. The rest of the field are very talented and that in itself is an intriguing aspect of the WTA’s appeal.

But the one thing the women’s game lacks is a top rivalry to generate a hype that the ATP clearly has right now.

As Mark Petchey said it’s an issue that needs solving soon as every sport has one, “Rivalries drive the sport. What they do is make sure that it manifests itself in a big polarisation of a large fan base, against another one,” Petchey was quoted as saying by Tennis365.

“You look across the board, over F1, look at the tribal nature of AFL, of Premier League football here. It’s a huge part of what you need to have a successful sport. That is the one thing that is missing from the women’s tour at the moment, is a superb rivalry, with a little bit of edge.

“That’s why I say I’m sad that Ash pulled up stumps, because I think that rivalry could’ve developed with Iga in that way. Would it have been quite as intense as the Rafa-Novak and Roger-Novak rivalries? Probably not. But it would have been there. Going into every major saying that you’re not looking forward to a specific clash potentially when the draw comes out, does hurt the tour a little bit. 

“You can’t keep saying ‘oh, anyone can win it’. Because you’re just not tagging anybody… you’re not setting the scene for something amazing that’s going to happen, a nice little volcanic eruption right at the back-end of a major. They need some people to be a bit more consistent and getting through, because that’s what will be a massive driver for the WTA.”

It’s hard to argue with those points of view from Petchey as rivalries are what are talked about for decades after players have retired.

It will be interesting to see whether Swiatek will continue to dominate the rest of the field or whether someone can build a rivalry with the Pole heading into the remainder of the season.

The next big WTA event of the year will take place at the Rogers Cup in Toronto on the week of the eighth of August.

Continue Reading


Why Celebrating LGBT+ Pride Month In Tennis Matters

Besides the fancy rainbow-coloured clothing that is worn, there is a far more important reason.




Guido Pella during a Men's Singles match at the 2021 US Open, Wednesday, Sep. 1, 2021 in Flushing, NY. (Manuela Davies/USTA)

June is when players switch their focus from the clay to grass in order to tune up their preparations ahead of the prestigious Wimbledon Championships. But for some linked to the sport this month is also significant for another reason.


It is LGBT pride month which is an initiative that was originally created as a way to mark the Stonewall Riots which began on June 28th 1969 in New York. A series of protests took place in response to a police raid on the Stonewall Inn which was the catalyst in the fight for equal rights among the LGBT community. In the UK the first pride March was held in 1972 and today there are more than 100 events in the country annually.

Today Pride is about promoting equality in the world with various organizations taking part, including tennis. The British Lawn Tennis Association has gotten more involved this year by hosting a series of Pride Days at their ATP and WTA events. They have taken place on the Friday of tournaments in Nottingham, Birmingham and Queen’s. The final one is taking place this Friday in Eastbourne.

“We still live in a time when people don’t always feel like they can be open about their sexual orientation or gender identity, so the more we can do to show support and let them know everything is ok the better,’ British player Liam Broady recently said.


Some may wonder as to if Pride events such as these are necessary in tennis considering it is 2022 and lives for LGBT people have improved considerably over the years. However, there is still work to be done. One study called OUTSPORT found that 90% of LGBT+ respondents believe that homophobia and transphobia is a problem in sport and 33% remain closeted in their own sporting context. Another study conducted in recent years is Out On The Fields which found almost eight out of 10 respondents felt that an openly gay person would not be very safe as a spectator at a sporting event. Obviously, these findings vary depending on the sport and the country, but it still illustrates the seriousness of the subject.

In tennis, the WTA Tour has seen various LGBT role models triumph at the very top. Both Billie Jean King and Martina Navratilova were some of the very first professional athletes to come out publicly during the 1980s which was a decade when misinformation about the Aids crises lead to the stigmation of the gay community. King said she lost all of her endorsements within 24 hours after being outed in 1981 and that was before the Aids crisis erupted. Navratilova also experienced similar misfortunes.

The WTA was founded on the principles of equality and opportunity, along with positivity and progress, and wholeheartedly supports and encourages players, tournaments, partners and fans’ commitment to LGBT+ initiatives,” the WTA told UbiTennis last week.
“The WTA supports LGBT+ projects across the tennis family, such as amplifying our athletes’ voices on this topic through the Tour’s global platforms, increasing awareness by incorporating the LGBT+ spirit into our wider corporate identity, among many other initiatives.”

The International Tennis Federation (ITF) tells UbiTennis the sport has a ‘proud history of advocating social change.’ The organization oversees the running of all junior events, Davis Cup, Billie Jean King Club and the Olympic tennis events.

“Inclusion is one of the ITF’s core values and a pillar of the ITF 2024 strategy. Tennis as a sport has a proud history of advocating social justice and instigating change. Within the tennis community, we embrace the LGBTQ community and full support any initiative, such as the celebration of Pride Month, that continues the conversation and furthers progress in ensuring sport and society are free from bias and discrimination in any form. There is always more that can be done, and we will continue to make every effort to ensure that all our participants, our employees and fans feel welcome, included, and respected day in, day out.” The ITF said in a statement.

Whilst the women’s Tour has had plenty of LGBT role models, it is different on the men’s circuit. At present there is no openly gay player in men’s tennis where around 2000 people have an ATP ranking. In recent months the governing body has looked into making the Tour more inclusive. Last year they reached out to Lou Englefield, the director of Pride Sports, a UK organisation that focuses on LGBTQ+phobia in sport and aims to improve access to sport for all LGBTQ+ people. Through their connection, they contacted Eric Denison, a behavioural science researcher at Monash University’s School of Social Sciences. Monash University supplied the ATP with a series of scientifically validated questions, which they used to ‘look under the hood’ at the factors which supports a culture where gay or bisexual players feel they are not welcome.

It has been over nine months since news of the survey taking place emerged but the findings are still to be published. In an email to Ubitennis, the ATP confirmed that they are ‘finalizing their next steps’ and will be making an announcement shortly. They acknowledge that the survey process has taken longer than expected but it is unclear as to why.

As for those who may be experiencing difficulty in their personal lives regarding their sexuality, Brian Vahaly has his own advice which he shared with Ubitennis last year. Vahaly is a former top 100 player who came out as gay after retiring from the sport.

“Find somebody to talk to, somebody you trust. Know that people like us are there if you have questions. It’s just nice to have somebody to talk to who can help you learn about yourself,” he said.
“What I try to do is in terms of putting my family forward is that we live a pretty ‘normal life.’ I have two kids, I have a house and I walked my kids to preschool this morning. It doesn’t have to be such a defining characteristic of who you are. In the sports world, it feels that it is magnified, but what I want to show is that you can have a great athletic career, meet somebody and have a family no matter your sexuality.”

Pride is as much about making sports such as tennis an open environment for everyone as it is about marking a series of historic protests which took place in America more than 40 years ago.

Continue Reading


It’s Unfair, Rafa Is Too Good In Roland Garros Final

James Beck reflects on Nadal’s latest triumph at Roland Garros.




Rafael Nadal - Roland Garros 2022 (foto Roberto Dell'Olivo)

This one was almost unfair.


It was like Rafa Nadal giving lessons to one of his former students at the Nadal academy back home in Mallorca.

When this French Open men’s singles final was over in less than two hours and a half, Rafa celebrated, of course. But he didn’t even execute his usual championship ritual on Court Philippe Chatrier of falling on his back on the red clay all sprawled out.

This one was that easy for the 36-year-old Spanish left-hander. He yielded only six games.

 It certainly didn’t have the characteristics of his many battles at Roland Garros with Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer.

It must have been a bit shocking to the packed house of mostly Rafa fans.


Nadal didn’t miss many of his patented shots such as his famed reverse cross-court forehand. He was awesome at times. Young 23-year-old Casper Ruud must have realized that by the middle of the second set when Rafa started on his amazing 11-game winning streak to finish off a 6-3, 6-3, 6-0 victory.

Ruud is good. The Norway native will win his share of ATP titles, but probably not many Grand Slam titles. If any, at least until Rafa goes away to a retirement, certainly on his island of Mallorca.

Rafa already has his own statue on the grounds of Roland Garros. Perhaps, Mallorca should be renamed Rafa Island.


Ruud displayed a great forehand at times to an open court. But when Rafa applied his usual pressure to the corners Ruud’s forehand often  went haywire.

Rafa’s domination started to show in the third set as Ruud stopped chasing Nadal’s wicked reverse cross-court forehands. 

Ruud simply surrendered the last three games while Nadal yielded only three points. Nadal finished it off with a sizzling backhand down the line. In the end, nice guy, good sport and former student Ruud could only congratulate Rafa.


The great John McEnroe even called Nadal’s overall perfection “insanely good.”

If Iga Swiatek’s 6-1, 6-3 win in Saturday’s women’s final over young Coco Gauff was a mismatch,  Iga’s tennis idol staged a complete domination of Ruud a day later.

It appears that the only thing that can slow Rafa down is his nearly always sore left foot, not his age. He won his first French Open final 17 years ago.

For Nadal to win a 22nd Grand Slam title to take a 22-20-20 lead over his friends and rivals Djokovic and Federer is mind-boggling, but not as virtually unbelievable as winning a 14th  French Open title.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award for print media. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. 

Continue Reading