If You Want An Example Of Sexism In Tennis, Focus On The US Open Doubles Champions - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Grand Slam

If You Want An Example Of Sexism In Tennis, Focus On The US Open Doubles Champions

On Sunday the women’s doubles trophy ceremony was cut short for the men and nobody batted an eyelid.

Published

on

Saturday night’s women’s final will forever be remembered in the history of the US Open, but for all the wrong reasons.

A dramatic argument between Serena Williams and umpire Carlos Ramos resulted in the former world No.1 ending up with a game penalty. Williams was warned three times for coaching, smashing her racket and verbal abuse towards the official. The fallout from that match was just as dramatic. Ramos has been accused of sexism in what was arguably the most difficult moment of his entire career. Both the WTA and USTA backed Williams before the ITF finally stood up for Ramos. Arguing that he just followed the rules.

In the aftermath of the match is an entire debate about the treatment of women in the sport. Although many don’t believe sexism was a factor in that match. Ramos has a history of being strict with both male and female players. Upon reflection many, including myself, don’t think Ramos made his decision based on gender.

What seems to be extraordinary is the lack of reaction to the conclusion of the women’s doubles final on Sunday. Ashleigh Barty and Coco Vandeweghe battled to an epic 3-6 7-6 (7-2) 7-6 (8-6) win over second seeds Timea Babos and Kristina Mladenovic. Earning their first grand slam title as a pair. It was a magical moment for Barty and Vandeweghe, but neither got the award ceremony that dreamt of.

“I’m just bummed we didn’t have any sort of award ceremony,” Vandeweghe told reporters.
“We couldn’t thank anyone. I think that was poor form.
“Maybe we’ll get another moment sometime, we’ll have another Grand Slam at Australia. Maybe they’ll do us right in Australia since the U.S. couldn’t do me right.”

Barty’s and Vandeweghe’s match took place before the men’s final. Lasting more than two-and-a-half hours, there was a chance that it could result in the delay of Novak Djokovic’s clash with Juan Martin del Potro. Officials feared this happening and instead opted to conduct a brief trophy ceremony. Taking away from the two winners the opportunity to speak to the crowd.

“To be honest, I don’t think they would have worried if they were 10 or 15 minutes delayed,” Barty said.
“I think it would have been nice for us to be able to thank our teams and all the people that make it a possibility, and to thank the crowd as well.
“They were a little bit confused as to why we weren’t given the opportunity.”

In fact Barty was told that the pair needed to leave the court soon because ‘the men needed to start.’ One would question it the same would happen if it was the Bryan brothers or a high-profile male doubles final taking place instead.

So why was there no uproar? Williams claimed that she was being penalised by the umpire for being a woman and a massive debate has taken over tennis. Meanwhile the two women’s doubles champions were literally told that they needed to cut short their celebrations to accommodate the men’s final.

I would have to question the double standards of the USTA, who runs the US Open. Their chairman, Katrina Adams, told ESPN ‘there’s no equality. I think there has to be some consistency across the board. These are conversations that will be imposed in the next weeks.” Adams’ calls for consistency is welcome, but a bit hypocritical. How can the USTA urge equality when the women’s doubles champions are being told to leave the court because the men want to start?

In reality action only gets taken on these subjects depending on the calibre of the player involved. Williams is one of the most successful female tennis players in the history of the sport. Meanwhile, Barty and Vandeweghe are nowhere near as on the same level. Not to say that either of them are bad players.

Double standards in the world of tennis is evident. Not just in relation to sexism, but in relation to how players are treated. Williams was a questionable victim of sexism, but two of her fellow players were. Yet there is no debate.

This is the real problem in tennis. Not how Ramos conducted himself in accordance to the rule book.

Grand Slam

Roger Federer Addresses ‘Out Of Context’ Claims Of Preferential Treatment At Australian Open

The former world No.1 has responded to allegations made about him by a former top 30 player for the first time.

Published

on

World No.3 Roger Federer has refused to get drawn into a debate over allegations that he receives special treatment at the Australian Open due to his business interests. 

During a recent interview with French Radio station RMC Sport, former top 30 player Julien Benneteau claimed that the 37-year-old receives favorable scheduling at the Melbourne grand slam. Benneteau has suggested that there is a conflict of interest between Federer and tournament director Craig Tiley. Pointing out the Swiss players business interests with tennis Australia.

“He’s the Australian Open tournament director,” Benneteau told RMC Sport.
“And the man is paid by Roger Federer’s agent for the Laver Cup.
“Over the last two Australian Opens, (Federer) played 14 matches, because he was champion and finalist. And he played 12 or 13 of his 14 matches in the night session.”

Questioned about the comments for the first time following his win over Dominic Thiem, a reluctantly speaking Federer said the quotes have been ‘taken out of context.’ On Monday fellow players Novak Djokovic and John Isner dismissed the idea of favoritism being an issue in the sport.

“I don’t really feel the mood during a World Tour Finals to discuss that topic, to be honest. In all fairness, I hope you understand why, because this is a bit of a celebration for tennis.” Federer replied when questioned.
“Julien, who is a nice guy, I know him since the junior times, I think all of this has been totally taken out of context.”
“I don’t feel like I need to comment on this. I’d rather put it to rest rather than adding to it so you guys got something to write about. “

Pressed further, Federer diplomatically sidestepped one claim that his agent, Tony Godsick, requested for him to not play on the Louis Armstrong Court at the US Open. According to Benneteau, Godsick went to the umpire office and effectively said ‘‘No way are you scheduling him here!’

“Sometimes I get asked, Do you want to play day or night? Sometimes they go ask the agent.” He explained. “Sometimes we have our say. But I asked to play Monday at the US Open. I played Tuesday night. It’s all good, you know. I’ve had that problem for 20 years in a good way. Sometimes I get help, sometimes I don’t.”

Whilst Federer is reluctant to go into details about the subject, the Australian Open has hit back in a lengthy statement. Citing the credentials of the Swiss as one of the reasons why he is usually scheduled to play on the premier courts. Federer is a six-time winner of the tournament. Winning 94 out of 107 matches played there throughout his career.

“Roger Federer is a once-in-a-generation player widely regarded as one of the biggest ‘box office’ athletes in the world,” tournament organizer Tiley said in a statement. “He has been regularly voted Australia’s favorite athlete.”
“The fans demand his appearance in the big stadiums and our broadcasters naturally want his matches to air in prime time. And I don’t think there’s a tournament director in the world who’s not going to take those factors into account when setting the schedule.”

Federer will return to action on Thursday at the ATP Finals when he takes on Kevin Anderson.

Continue Reading

ATP

Novak Djokovic Dismisses Favouritism Claims Amid Allegations Made Against Federer

The 14-time grand slam champion has jumped to the defense of his Swiss rival.

Published

on

World No.1 Novak Djokovic has hit back at suggestions that men’s tennis has a problem with favoritism after a former player recently accused Roger Federer benefiting from bias at the Australian Open.

Julien Benneteau, who peaked at a high of 25th in the world back in 2014, said during a recent interview that the 20-time grand slam champion receives preferential treatment at the Melbourne major. Citing Federer’s business partnership with tournament director Craig Tiley. They are both involved in the development of the Laver Cup, which the Frenchman claims is a conflict of interest.

“He’s the Australian Open tournament director,” Benneteau told RMC Sport.
“And the man is paid by Roger Federer’s agent for the Laver Cup.
“Over the last two Australian Opens, (Federer) played 14 matches, because he was champion and finalist. And he played 12 or 13 of his 14 matches in the night session.”

Federer, who lost his opening match at the ATP Finals on Sunday, is yet to respond to the accusation. Although questions have been raised about if favoritism is an issue in men’s tennis. Especially when it comes to the quartet of players that have contributed the most to the development of the ATP Tour over the past 20 years. Known as The Big Four, the quartet is made up of Federer, Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Andy Murray.

“In a way, we have to be more specific. If we’re talking about general, so to say, the advantage of some players over another, I mean, in a way it’s expected that the tournament treats top players, their top stars, as players that they want to have kind of feel the best.” Djokovic responded when asked if favoritism was an issue in tennis.
“In terms of the scheduling, those kinds of important things, everyone is even because it has to go through the filter of ATP, not just the tournament itself.” He added.

Speaking more specifically about the Federer allegation, Djokovic swiftly played down any hype surrounding it. Focusing on his record in the sport. The 37-year-old has won 99 ATP titles, which is the second highest tally in the history of men’s tennis. Federer has also won more grand slam trophies in singles than any other man.

“I really don’t see a very strong argument there.” Said Djokovic. “I understand Julien’s point because sometimes it does seem that maybe certain players get more favored year after year in certain tournaments. You kind of have to follow the pattern to really understand whether there is a case or not.”
“On the other side, you have to understand that also Federer is a driving force of tennis in terms of revenue, in terms of attention, in terms of all these different things.”

Similar to Djokovic, American No.1 John Isner shares a similar mentality when questioned about the subject. Going further by saying the elite of the sport deserves more treatment for what they have done for the promotion of the sport. For example, Federer’s endorsements have been valued at $65 million over a 12-month period, according to Forbes Magazine.

“The top players, they sell the most tickets, therefore, they should get the most. That’s what I think.” Said Isner. “I don’t think there’s a favoritism system like that at all. I think those guys are the ones that by and large carry our sport in a big way and they deserve everything they’ve ever earned.”
“If anything, they may be should get more special treatment because those guys, the top players, have made other players below them a lot of money. It is like the Tiger Woods effect in golf.”

The big four in tennis have won 53 grand slam titles since the 2003 Wimbledon Championships.

At the ATP Finals, Djokovic will next play Alexander Zverev on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Isner takes on Marin Cilic.

Continue Reading

ATP

‘No Idea If It Was My Last Match’ – Roger Federer Undecided On French Open Return

The former world No.1 gives an update about his plans for the future in the French capital.

Published

on

What if Roger Federer’s thrilling three sets clash against Novak Djokovic on Saturday was the last competitive match he played in Paris?

The 37-year-old was knocked out in the semi-finals of the Paris Masters by the in-form Djokovic in what was one of the most memorable clashes between the two in their rivalry. Federer saved all 12 break points he faced during the three hour encounter, but came up short in the decisive tiebreaker. Enabling Djokovic to set up a final showdown against Russia’s Karen Khachanov.

“Overall, it was a good tournament. I can look back and think it was definitely worth it to come to Paris. The welcome was great. I played some good tennis, so I can be happy.” Federer said afterwards.

In recent years, it has become somewhat of a rarity to see the world No.3 play in France. This week was the first time he has played at the AccorHotels Arena since 2015. He missed the event last year due to a back injury. Although tournament director Guy Forget blasted the Swiss player for his withdrawal. Federer hasn’t also played at Roland Garros, France’s biggest tennis event, since 2015.

Federer remains on the fence about if he will return to Roland Garros next year. In recent years he has opted to skip the clay-court season in order to rest his body and recover. Back in 2016 he was forced to miss six months of the tour due to a knee injury.

“No idea if it was the last match (in Paris),” he told reporters.
“As I said for the French Open, I will decide at the end of the year to see how it will have an impact on my physical training.
“Bercy (Paris Masters) as for next year, it’s like every year, it’s always difficult.”

Whilst the inevitable talk about Federer’s retirement escalates as he gets older, there is no indication that it will be in the near future. Earlier this week his coach, Severin Luthi, said during an interview with Le Temps that he believes Federer will hang up his racket in ‘one to three years.’

“I can’t foresee too much in advance, but I don’t think it will be my last match here (in Paris).” Federer concluded.

Federer will return to action at the ATP World Tour Finals, which will get underway on November 11th. He will be bidding to win the season-ending tournament for a record seventh time.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending