Things That Make You Go Mackie! - UBITENNIS
Connect with us


Things That Make You Go Mackie!

Mackenzie McDonald has reached the Round of 16 on this first Wimbledon. From the pro debut at 18 to UCLA to the Top 100




Some of the most dedicated tennis fans may remember him from a few years ago: Mackenzie McDonald, the American player who has reached the Round of 16 at Wimbledon on his first attempt, had already made himself known in the tennis world in 2013, when as an 18-year-old fresh out of high school he got through qualifying at the Cincinnati Masters 1000 defeating two top-100 like Nicolas Mahut and Steve Johnson. A few weeks earlier he had lost in the Round of 16 at the USTA Under 18 National Championships in Kalamazoo, Michigan, the main appointment for all young American tennis hopefuls, an the then-USTA Men’s Player Development Director Jay Berger awarded him a wild card to the qualifying draw at the Masters 1000 in Ohio. “I had considered whether to go play a college tournament in Indiana instead, but eventually I decided to play in Cinicinnati”. The lack of pressure and expectations freed his arm and made him play above his actual level leading to the surprising victories against Johnson and Mahut, before being brought down to earth in the first round of the main draw losing 6-1 6-1 to future top-10 David Goffin.


Despite that smashing debut on the pro circuit, Mackie (this is his nickname in the locker room) decided to forfeit the prize money and to take a scholarship at UCLA, the prestigious state university in Los Angeles, California, were it’s safe to assume that his win against former NCAA champion Steve Johnson from UCLA’s archrival University of South California scored him some brownie points with his future teammates. In 2013 his tennis was showing a lot of potential, but his serve and his physical strengths were nowhere near pro-ready: he himself was estimating his weight back then to 142 pounds “on a good day”.

During his college years, Mackie worked very hard with his coach Billy Martin, confining his pro activity (looking for points but not money, as the NCAA rules impose) to the off-term season, but he never approached the levels he showed on his debut tournament. After spending two years at UCLA playing and studying political sciences, and after achieving the prestigious “daily double” in 2016 (winning the NCAA title both in singles and in doubles on the same day), he turned pro and started hitting the ATP Pro Tour full-time.

He started obtaining some good results in the fall of 2017, when he reached the semifinals in the Tiburon Challenger (where he lost to Tennys Sandgren) and, two weeks later, he won his first Challenger title in Fairfield, California. This success projected him into the top 200 of the ATP ranking for the first time and allowed him to end the year at n.178. “That week in Fairfield was very special for me as a California boy. There were a lot of fires in that area and we had to suspend play several times during the week because of smoke and ash; furthermore, I had no coach with me that week, but luckily I wasn’t too far from home so there were quite a few people to support me anyway”.

In 2018 he stepped into the spotlight playing an excellent Australian Open, where he got through qualifying, won his first round match with Elias Ymer and played an epic match with Grigor Dimitrov, losing only 8-6 in the fifth during a marquee night match on the Rod Laver Arena. “It was a tough loss to take – said Mackenzie – but for me it was the first match on a big stage, and it was a great experience anyway”. That result pushed him into the Top 150 of the ATP ranking and gave him enough confidence to reach the final of the Dallas Challenger two weeks later, where he lost to Kei Nishikori.

The 23-year-old Piedmont, California native now reportedly weighs 160 pounds, that is 18 pounds more than he was weighing five years ago on his pro debut. Like most of US top prospects, he works with a coach assigned to him by the USTA whose name is Mat Cloer: “Mat is a great coach, he is not afraid to change my shots if he believes it is necessary. We worked on my serve and we changed that, but above all we worked on my fitness to increase my resistance and my muscle mass”.

Here at Wimbledon he took advantage of the void left in the draw by the elimination of n.3 seed Marin Cilic and reached the Round of 16 in the most prestigious Grand Slam tournament on his first attempt.I can’t believe it – he declared after defeating Guido Pella in his third-round match – if anyone at the beginning of the tournament had told me that I would get to the fourth round I would have never believed it”.
McDonald, who is now certain to take home at least 163,000 British Pounds (roughly 216,000 dollars, almost half of his entire career prize money) earned his spot in the last 16 with a 3-set victory on Pella bus also with an epic 11-9 in the fifth win over Nicolas Jarry in his second round. During these Championships he can also count on the advice of the coach who looked after him from the age of 11 until he went to college: Wayne Ferreira, former ATP n.6 and twice semi-finalist at the Australian Open. The South African ex-player is at Wimbledon as a TV commentator and helped his former pupil to remain calm before his match with Pella.

After turning pro, McDonald left his native California and moved to the USTA Campus in Orlando, Florida.It was a tough choice, it’s all very different from California. But the facilities are excellent, I can train with a lot of great players there, it’s one of the things that needs to be done”.

With the points he is going to obtain at Wimbledon, McDonald will break into the Top 100 for the first time in his career, securing direct acceptance into all Grand Slam draws and climbing approximately to n.80.

Like the majority of players in his generation, his favorite tennis players are Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer.But it would be stupid to model my game on theirs – he points out – I rather have to learn from players that are more similar to me, such as Goffin or Nishikori or, as John [McEnroe] told me, I should try to study David Ferrer’s game”.


Laver Back In the Conversation For Greatest Player?

Daniil Medvedev thwarted Djokovic’s Calendar Year Grand Slam ambitions and is ready to take over as the best in the game.




Who’s the greatest player ever?


How about Rod Laver, the owner of two Calendar Grand Slams?

Or what about Rafa Nadal, the owner of 21 major singles titles (including Olympic Gold)?

Or what about 20-20-20-Laver?


Since Novak Djokovic failed in his bid to win a Calendar Grand Slam on Sunday, I nominate the last of the three possibilities. 20-20-20-Laver sounds like a winner.

For Djokovic just to enter the conversation was a major achievement, and that was spurred by the Serbian’s bid for a Calendar Grand Slam.

Daniil Medvedev ended that conversation on Sunday, at least for now, with his straight-set 4-4-4 dismantling of Djokovic in the U.S. Open final.


As 2021 turned out, it was a really disappointing year for Djokovic, even though he won the year’s first three Grand Slam events. Most players would be out celebrating if they won three Grand Slams in one year.

The loss to Alexander Zverev in the Tokyo Olympics ended Novak’s Golden Grand Slam. And then Medvedev took care of the Calendar Grand Slam talk and the possibility of Djokovic breaking a 20-20-20 deadlock with Nadal and Roger Federer.

So, what’s next? I doubt that Novak is planning to skip the Australian Open in January. Even that one won’t be easy for Djokovic as a result of what has happened in late summer.


Djokovic has practically owned the Australian Open with nine titles in Melbourne, and eight of the last 11. But Medvedev and Zverev will be major obstacles for Djokovic in Melbourne, along with Stefanos Tsitsipas.

The Australian Open isn’t likely to be a picnic for Novak, even if Federer and Nadal skip the trip. If so, Federer and Nadal will be leaving the Australian Open in capable hands.

Things should start heating up by the quarterfinals Down Under.

By the way, Djokovic is 34 years old. That’s about the age Nadal started having trouble winning Grand Slams.


Medvedev beat Djokovic at just about everything he tried on Sunday. Djokovic was never in the game on serving competition or powerful forehands.

Those areas belonged to the 25-year-old Russian.

And movement? On this day, Medvedev had a picnic. The 6-6 first-time Grand Slam winner was everywhere with his amazing quickness. Djokovic couldn’t put a dent in his baseline defense.

Medvedev even out-did Djokovic in the Serbian’s usually solid drop shot department, pinning  even more disappointment on Novak.

Novak even caused a ball girl to change directions during the match as he swung his racket near the surface in  frustration after losing a point. Later, he punished his racket by smashing it into the court and destroying it.


The key to the relatively easy win for Medvedev was his serve. He was a perfect 15-for-15 on first-serve points in the opening set.

Medvedev obviously had little trouble with his serve until he was ready to end the match. With Medvedev owning a match point at 5-2 in the third set, the crowd tried to help Djokovic. Only then when the crowd got into the act of trying to break Medvedev’s attention did he double-fault twice in a row before netting a forehand to give Djokovic the game.

But in the final game of the match, Medvedev was ready for the crowd attack, although he double-faulted another match point away before ending the match with a big serve out wide for a 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 victory. Djokovic managed only to hit the bottom of the net with his backhand return.

And suddenly, the tall Russian looks like the best player in the game.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at

Continue Reading


Raducanu Proved She’s The Better Player

The British sensation shocked the tennis world – can she keep it up in the coming years?




They played in the largest tennis stadium in the world.


They were teenagers. They achieved a dream early in their careers.

It just as easily could have been a junior championship a year earlier in their careers.

Only a few people would have been watching then. Such an event might not even have drawn newspaper coverage.


This meeting was much bigger and more important. The two participants would be $2.7 million richer between them before the day ended. They would become famous the world over, at least for now.

But this was Saturday, 9/11/21.

Real life now sets in. There probably are at least 100 other players in the world who are just as outstanding as Emma Raducanu and Leylah Fernandez. Yet, most of them will never be involved in a Grand Slam singles final.


What Raducanu and Fernandez accomplished will never be forgotten, always listed in tennis annals.

England will always be proud of its new Grand Slam champion. At long last, Virginia Wade has company.

And Canada will never forget its feisty Grand Slam runner-up.

They stood the test while other more touted and talented players buckled at the knees. High-ranked players crumbled at the thought of losing to a mere teenager.

Next time, that advantage probably won’t exist.


Raducanu and Fernandez played the final like the teenagers they are.

Raducanu came close to making it a one-sided result when she held match point twice with a 5-2 lead in the second set. But Fernandez did not give up on her left-handed game that Raducanu had conquered before in the junior ranks.

After losing both points and the game to make the match closer, Raducanu fought off a pair of break points in the next game before making good on her third match point for a 6-4, 6-3 victory.

The British 18-year-old generally outplayed the 19-year-old Fernandez most of the 111-minute final. Raducanu had more firepower on her serve and ground strokes.


Raducanu played like a tour veteran, even if it was only her fourth tour-level event. It was her 10th straight win without dropping a set, counting her three wins in qualifying just to get into the main draw. No women’s qualifier before even had advanced to a Grand Slam final.

She has the game to win consistently on the tour, but probably not strong enough to challenge the Top 10 players and Grand Slam titlists right away. She’s now no longer under the radar. Everyone wants to beat a Grand Slam champion.

This may have been just a one-shot opening that Raducanu took full advantage of to win a Grand Slam title.  Just in case the road ahead gets bumpy, she might want to be thrifty with the $1.8 million payday.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at

Continue Reading


Novak Djokovic Was Pushed To An Amazing Performance

Zverev fell just short of beating the world N.1, and now Medvedev is the last obstacle still standing on his path to a Calendar Year Grand Slam




Novak Djokovic was simply amazing Friday night.


True, he made a few mistakes against Alexander Zverev, but not when they counted most.

Zverev also was superb, but his mistakes came when they counted really big.

For those reasons, Djokovic is getting ready to play for the unthinkable. No one had thought much about a Calendar Grand Slam until back in June when Djokovic shocked the tennis world with a victory over Rafa Nadal at the French Open.

By the time Wimbledon came around without Roger Federer and Nadal in the field, the odds were high that Djokovic actually could achieve a Calendar Grand Slam. And then he won Wimbledon and in the process turned the race for most Grand Slam titles into a 20-20-20 battle.


When Federer and Nadal pulled out of the U.S. Open, all of Djokovic’s goals except a Golden Grand Slam when he lost to Zverev at the Olympics were in play.

Nearly two weeks later, Djokovic is one victory away from breaking out of the 20-20-20 deadlock as well as completing a rare Calendar Grand Slam.

Zverev pressed Djokovic into playing his very best to escape with a 4-6, 6-2, 6-4, 4-6, 6-2 victory in the U.S. Open semifinals. Only a cold start to the fifth set chilled Zverev’s hopes of spoiling Novak’s dreams.

Even after losing the first five games of the fifth set, Zverev still came close to making things interesting by winning the next two games and going to 30-30 in the eighth game.


Zverev’s improving game, and his big strokes and serves probably were enough to make Novak hope he won’t have to face Zverev’s hard balls again in January at the Australian Open.

That leaves only Daniil Medvedev between Djokovic and immortality.

Medvedev will have to be at his best to beat Novak. The slender 6-6 Russian can’t afford even a brief meltdown if he is to take Djokovic to the wire.

Medvedev appeared to be in awe of Djokovic when the two met in  this year’s Australian Open final.  Djokovic won that one easily in straight sets.


Medvedev’s game is a piece of work. He is completely unpredictable.

His whip forehand is one of the best shots in tennis. He backs it up with incredible movement.

It all depends on whether Medvedev can stick with Novak until the end. If Medvedev is still there, Novak likely will feel the heavy legs from his 214-minute bout with Zverev.

Not even Djokovic can out-move Medvedev. And the Russian’s uniquely quick serve has plenty of pop. He is due to win a Grand Slam.

But Medvedev will have to pull off a miracle against one of the smartest and slyest players tennis has ever seen if he is to win this U.S. Open.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at

Continue Reading