Steve Flink on Novak Djokovic Rewriting Tennis Tistory - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Comments

Steve Flink on Novak Djokovic Rewriting Tennis Tistory

Published

on

by Steve Flink

At the end of his 70th career Grand Slam tournament and his 19th appearance at Roland Garros, Novak Djokovic made good on two overriding goals. He captured his 23rd major title, moving to the top of the men’s list at last with the triumph. In turn, he took his third crown at Roland Garros, which made him the first and only man in the history of the sport to secure at least three singles titles at all four majors. He raised his record in major finals to 23-11, and has now claimed victory in 15 of his last 18 title round contests at the Grand Slam championships. Moreover, the 36-year-old established himself as the oldest man (at 36 years and twenty days) ever to rule at Roland Garros.

By virtue of his latest monumental win in Paris, Djokovic moves back to No. 1 in the world and, for the second time in three years and the third time overall in his career, he is half way to a Grand Slam after securing the first two majors of the season. Having won the last four Wimbledon singles titles and seven altogether at the shrine, he will be a clear favorite to come through again next month on the lawns of the All England Club.

In his final round meeting at Roland Garros against No. 4 seed Casper Ruud—who was appearing in his third Grand Slam final of the last five played—Djokovic struggled inordinately early on to find his energy, rhythm, and customary ball control. He would make 32 unforced errors across three sets on this occasion, but 18 of those self inflicted wounds were in the first set. He made only 14 more the rest of the way.

Djokovic’s first set difficulties started in the second game on his serve. In a five deuce game, he had three game points but could not convert, and a resolute Ruud took full advantage. The Norwegian broke Djokovic for 2-0 and held on for 3-0. He was disrupting Djokovic skillfully from the backcourt, largely with high trajectory shots which made the Serbian play awkward shots above his shoulder too frequently.

The battle was being fought by and large on Ruud’s terms until he served at 4-2. Until that juncture, he was not only making Djokovic uncomfortable, but also executing his own game plan superbly. His vulnerable backhand was holding up surprisingly well, and his forehand was first rate. But he lost his serve apprehensively in the seventh game, bungling an overhead at break point down.

In the high humidity, Djokovic seemed to be breathing hard, but he fended off a break point in the eighth game. Having already missed a few routine overheads, he played his smash carefully and then answered Ruud’s response with a forehand drop volley winner on the 25th shot of a demanding exchange. Djokovic held on for 4-4 with an impeccable serve down the T setting up a forehand winner. He then had a break point in the following game, only to pull a forehand wide.

Ruud fully understood that he needed this opening set more than Djokovic. The 24-year-old held on steadfastly for 5-4 and had the Serbian down 0-30 in the tenth game. Djokovic met that moment boldly, making a backhand drop volley winner, and coming forward again to force an errant backhand pass. At 30-30 Ruud overhit a forehand second serve return, and then Djokovic approached the net again to draw an error. It was 5-5. Both players held at 15 for 6-6, and so, fittingly, a tie-break settled the outcome of the set.

That did not auger well for Ruud. Djokovic had won all five tie-breaks he had played in the previous rounds and had not made a single unforced error in any of them. Nothing changed against Ruud. Djokovic sent a flat forehand scorching down the line for a winner on the first point, and never looked back, wrapping it up with an ace and a forehand winner. He prevailed seven points to one and put himself out in front after 82 taxing minutes with his sixth tie-break triumph of the tournament. He played a total of 55 points in those six tie-breaks without making any unprovoked mistakes. None. Zero. Pause briefly and think about that.

The boost to Djokovic in coming from behind to win that set with such a dominant tie-break performance spilled over into the second set. He held at love for 1-0 with an ace, broke Ruud in the second game with persistence and polish from the backcourt, and then held for 3-0 at 15 after two aces and a service winner took him to 40-0. Djokovic surged to 5-2, had Ruud down 15-40 in the eighth game, and nearly sealed the set there.

The 24-year-old held on gamely, however, erasing two set points again him and forcing Djokovic to serve out the set. That was no problem for the Serbian, who held at love and reached two sets to love with a backhand down the line winner.

There is no better front runner in tennis today, and probably there never has been. But Ruud commendably fought on valiantly despite the severity of the obstacle he faced. At 1-1 in the third set, Djokovic had a break point that he squandered by netting a routine backhand down the line. On his way to 3-3, Djokovic conceded only one point on his own serve but Ruud was refusing to surrender.

The Norwegian gave himself an opening in the eighth game with Djokovic serving at 0-30, but the 36-year-old produced a fortunate forehand let cord winner. Djokovic swiftly took the next three points, winning two of the three with an ace and a service winner, taking the other with a swing volley that was too much for Ruud to handle. The set score was locked at 4-4.

Ruud remained unwavering, holding on for 5-4. But Djokovic simply raised the stakes one last time, and unleashed some of his most unanswerable tennis down the stretch. He held at love for 5-5 with two aces down the T in the deuce court and a game concluding forehand winner struck with clarity and conviction. He then broke Ruud at love, commencing that game with a backhand down the line winner, closing it with a two-hander driven crosscourt for another winner. Serving for the match, he raced to 40-0, missed a forehand crosscourt, and then coaxed one last error from a beleaguered yet thoroughly professional Ruud.  Djokovic had closed out the match and the tournament in style, taking three consecutive games, 12 of the last 13 points, and prevailing 7-6 (1), 6-3, 7-5. He made history of a high order once more with another supreme display of tactical acuity, increasing technical soundness off both sides, and enormous willpower. It was a final of which he could be proud. Across the last two sets, he did not face a break point, winning 44 of 53 points in eleven service games.

And yet, while every final is eagerly anticipated because of the immense and sometimes monumental consequences, the match everyone wanted to see more than any other at this edition of Roland Garros was the duel in the penultimate round between Djokovic and Carlos Alcaraz. In the weeks leading up to the French Open, it seemed entirely possible that Djokovic and Alcaraz would be the top two seeds. That, of course, would have ensured they could only meet in the final.

But when Daniil Medvedev surprisingly took the Italian Open crown in Rome, he moved past Djokovic in the ATP Rankings to No. 2 in the world. As fate would decree, Djokovic and Alcaraz— the two players who had captured the last three majors between them—ended up on the same half, and so they clashed in the semifinal round instead.

The first two sets of their encounter were nothing short of stupendous. The tennis soared to unimaginable levels. Both players were primed for the contest. It had the feeling of a final. Djokovic was magnificent in the opening set. He was out-dueling Alcaraz from the baseline, using the backhand down the line judiciously, walloping his forehand with extraordinary control and power and control, and beating the Spaniard to the punch in one crackling exchange after another.

Conceding only three points in his first two service games when he put ten of eleven first serves in play, the Serbian made his move in the fourth game. At break point, Djokovic implemented the drop shot to draw Alcaraz in. The Spaniard angled a forehand crosscourt in response. Djokovic answered with a forehand down the line, taking the net away from Alcaraz. The Spaniard tried to pass the Serbian with a backhand crosscourt, but Djokovic covered the net with alacrity, putting away a backhand volley into the open court.

Djokovic made that one break count. He held at 30 for 4-1, and sedulously protected his delivery in a five deuce seventh game, erasing three break points against him to reach 5-2. After Alcaraz saved a set point in the following game with a swing volley winner, Djokovic held his nerve admirably when he served for the set at 5-3. Down break point, he released a 129 MPH service winner out wide. He followed with a service winner to the Alcaraz forehand in the deuce court, and closed it out forcefully. Coming in behind his first serve, he coaxed an errant backhand return from Alcaraz. The set went to a supremely disciplined Djokovic, 6-3.

Gradually, Alcaraz found a higher level in the second set. Perhaps one inspirational moment altered his thinking and made him believe. With Alcaraz serving at 1-1, 15-0, Djokovic drew him forward with a backhand drop shot, and then cut off Alcaraz’s response with a backhand volley down the middle. Alcaraz chased it down with his customary speed, somehow wheeled around, turned, and sent a spectacular forehand pass crosscourt. The Spaniard beamed. Djokovic smiled appreciatively. The crowd applauded vociferously.

But considerable drama remained across the rest of that memorable second set. Serving at 2-3, 40-0, Djokovic netted a backhand down the line and immediately started shaking out his arm. He held on for 3-3 but, after Alcaraz moved in front with a hold for 4-3, the trainer came out at the changeover and massaged Djokovic’s right arm.

Perhaps preoccupied with whatever he was feeling, Djokovic was broken for the first time in the match to trail 5-3 as his serve speed dropped significantly. Nonetheless, he played a terrific return game to break right back with a backhand down the winner. Now serving at 4-5, Djokovic was down 0-40 but he swept five points in a row with precision serving, timely attacking and stinging groundstrokes.

The Serbian was back to 5-5. He then reached break point in the following game, only to mishandle a high backhand, uncharacteristically sending it wide crosscourt. Alcaraz managed to hold on for 6-5, and a tie-break seemed almost certain. But Djokovic served-and-volleyed on the first point of the twelfth game and angled a backhand first volley wide. Alcaraz proceeded to break at love, winning the set 7-5, making it one set all, leading most observers to believe that the best might be yet to come for both players.

But after Alcaraz held in the opening game of the third set, Djokovic was serving at 40-30 in the second game and it was apparent that the Spaniard was in trouble. He lost that point with an off balance netted forehand return as Djokovic reached 1-1, but now Alcaraz was writhing. He was cramping all over his body on an exceedingly hot day. He took a timeout to have the trainer rub his legs, but the delay resulted in the automatic loss of the third game. Cramps are not considered an injury but rather a loss of conditioning.Djokovic had the benefit of a service break for 2-1 without hitting a ball.

The match was essentially over. Djokovic won a deuce game for 3-1, broke at love for 4-1, held at 15 for 5-1, and broke again at 30 to take the set 6-1. All Alcaraz could do was swing away and hope for the best but his mobility was severely restricted. Somewhat better in the fourth set, Alcaraz honorably stayed out there and took his punishment. Djokovic moved to 5-0 before Alcaraz ended an eleven game losing streak. Soon it was over and Djokovic had triumphed 6-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-1. For the first two sets, it was a glorious spectacle. Across the last two sets it was painful to watch, although Djokovic was highly professional in refusing to become distracted by an ailing adversary.

Djokovic had made it to the penultimate round by ousting No. 11 seed Karen Khachanov, who had been to the semifinals of his previous two majors and was hoping to keep that string going. Khachanov was bearing down hard as he took the first set from a listless Djokovic, and then both men held through the first twelve games of the second set. Djokovic had still not broken serve as he headed into a crucial second set tie-break. In that sequence, he was letter perfect, prevailing 7-0.

The triumph in that second set tie-break against Khachanov carried Djokovic right through the rest of the match. He lifted his game exponentially, swept through the third set 6-2, and built a 4-2 fourth set lead. Having won eleven of the last fifteen games since the start of the tie-break, Djokovic was back in his groove. Khachanov briefly halted his opponent’’s momentum, rallying to 4-4. But Djokovic once more went into his lockdown mode, capturing eight points in a row and two straight games to close out the battle 4-6, 7-6 (0), 6-2, 6-4.

In the previous round, Djokovic had dissected Juan Pablo Varillas 6-3, 6-2, 6-2. The Peruvian had knocked out a pair of seeds en route to the Djokovic appointment, defeating No. 19 Roberto Bautista Agut and No. 13 Hubert Hurkacz. He had won three five set matches in a row before taking on Djokovic, but the No. 3 seed took him apart methodically.

Perhaps the primary reason Djokovic was so sharp in his confrontation with Varillas was the third round test he had against the Spaniard Alejandro Davidovich Fokina. The No. 29 seed had toppled an off form Djokovic in their previous meeting at Monte Carlo in 2022, and he knows his way around a clay court well. He played an intelligent match and made Djokovic work awfully hard in the first two sets.

At 5-5 in the opening set, Djokovic, struggling inordinately with the wind at his back, served three double faults and lost his serve. He managed to break right back, but soon trailed 1-3 in the tiebreak before taking six of the next seven points to prevail 7-4, wrapping it up with a blazing forehand return winner. At 5-6 in a pendulum swinging second set, Djokovic was down set point but he refused to miss and forced his will on his adversary. In the ensuing tie-break, Djokovic was serving with a 4-1 lead, lost the next four points to trail 4-5, but collected three points in a row to reach two sets to love. On to victory he went 7-6 (4), 7-6 (5), 6-2. What could easily have been a five hour marathon ended instead in three hours and thirty six minutes.

Rounding out Djokovic’s road to the final, he was pushed hard in an 87 minute first set against Marton Fucsovics but thereafter he rolled to a 7-6 (2), 6-0, 6-3 second round victory. And his first round assignment was relatively routine as Djokovic accounted for Aleksandar Kovacevic 6-3, 6-2, 7-6 (1) after serving for the match at 5-4 in that third set against the world No. 114.

As for Ruud, the No. 4 seed took apart qualifier Elias Ymer 6-4, 6-3, 6-2 in the first round before a somewhat difficult 6-3, 6-2, 4-6, 7-5 victory over Giulio Zeppieri, a qualifier from Italy who had toppled the ever dangerous Alexander Bublik in the opening round. Ruud had to fight from behind to defeat Zhizhen Zhang 4-6, 6-4, 6-1, 6-4 in his third round skirmish. Next on Ruud’s agenda was a 7-6 (3) 7-5, 7-5 win over the Chilean Nicolas Jarry, a player who had beaten the Norwegian right before Roland Garros in the quarterfinals of Geneva.

That victory took Ruud into an eagerly awaited quarterfinal against No. 6 seed Holger Rune of Denmark. Ruud had beaten Rune in a four set quarterfinal at Roland Garros a year ago. But the Norwegian had suffered his first loss in five career collisions with Rune in Rome. Coming into the tournament, many in the tennis cognoscenti believed Rune might be ready to reach his first major final, and perhaps in a best case scenario even win the tournament.

But Rune was stretched to his limits by one of the world’s most improved clay court players. Francisco Cerendulo of Argentina—the No. 23 seed—took Rune into a fifth set tie-break after squandering an opportunity with the Dane serving at 3-4, 0-40. That meeting lasted one minute shy of four hours, and it was apparent from the outset of the Rune-Ruud quarterfinal that Rune was terribly depleted. He was almost unrecognizable over the first two sets, and Ruud fully exploited the situation, conceding only three games.

Early in the third, Rune found some energy and inspiration. It was enough to earn him a set, but that was it. Ruud resumed his mastery of the match with first rate ball striking and fine strategic acumen. He succeeded 6-1, 6-2, 3-6, 6-3. That gave the 24-yer-old an opportunity to face Sascha Zverev in the semifinals in a showdown most observers believed was a tossup.

It was, ultimately, nothing of the kind. Although Zverev was appearing in his third consecutive semifinal at Roland Garros and playing top of the line tennis, he was well below par against Ruud. Zverev was outmaneuvered from the backcourt and his first serve— one of the best in the business—was not finding the corners with regularity. He won only 55% of his first serve points and 45% on his second delivery and was broken six times. A highly focussed Ruud romped 6-3, 6-4, 6-0 in two hours and nine minutes.

Meanwhile, the upset of the tournament took place in the first round. Medvedev was riding high after Rome, where he won the first clay court title of his career, Not only that, but heading into Roland Garros he had won 39 of 44 matches and five titles altogether this season. But Medvedev was ushered out of the tournament in four hours and fifteen minutes by none other than qualifier Thiago Seyboth Wild 7-6 (5), 6-7 (6), 2-6, 6-3, 6-4. The Brazilian was hitting brilliantly through the wind and clipping lines with astounding consistency, but the fact remains that Medvedev saved two set points in the second set tie-break and seemingly had control of the match. He lost his serve three times in the fifth set. This enigmatic fellow lost in the third round of the Australian Open and  then bowed out in the first round at Roland Garros. He should be better than that.

No one is saying that about Novak Djokovic. What made his Roland Garros championship run all the more remarkable was because it came on the heels of one of his most disappointing clay court seasons. The best he did in three tournaments en route to Paris was to reach the quarterfinals in Rome, where he did not play well against Holger Rune in a three set clash,

During that stretch, Djokovic was struggling with his elbow and battling other ailments. But when the most prestigious prize of them all on clay was at stake in Paris, Djokovic was not found wanting. By succeeding at Roland Garros, the world No. 1 has put himself in an enviable position. Not many players stand much of a chance against Djokovic at Wimbledon. In my view, he has an excellent chance of garnering an eighth title to tie Roger Federer’s men’s record.

Two years ago he did get the job done on the lawns, and then went all the way to the final of the U.S. Open. He was three sets away from becoming only the third man and sixth player to win the Grand Slam. But he lost to Medvedev in Arthur Ashe Stadium.

I believed then that despite his astonishing drive and determination that he would never get a chance like that again. I thought it was asking too much of him. And yet, here he is with another opportunity to set himself apart on the historical ladder of the game he has played so prodigiously for a living. Here he is, heading into Wimbledon committed to winning there again, thoroughly believing in himself. Here is Novak Djokovic, chasing and making history of the rarest kind, relishing the thought of adding to his luster, fully appreciating the life he leads and the targets he keeps hitting. Of the last 17 majors Djokovic has played, he has been victorious in no fewer than eleven.

Will he take these next two majors and establish himself as the first man since Rod Laver in 1969 to secure a Grand Slam? I believe he is going to realize that remarkable feat.

Comments

Could Regional Groups Boost Davis Cup’s Appeal?

Home-and-away ties are charming, but may be complicated and expensive. Round-robin groups are efficient, but may lack atmosphere. A possible solution for Davis Cup to have the cake and eat it, too

Published

on

The Australian Open ended barely a week ago and tennis has celebrated another milestone of its ever-grueling calendar. The past weekend saw Davis Cup select the 16 teams for the final stage of the competition through the Qualifiers that took place across continents and time zones.

We gave an account of the results of these 12 ties, some of which ended in a nailbiter, over the course of the past few days. Here, however, we want to stress once again how this highly criticized event, profoundly changed in its formula by the “Kosmos revolution”, still manages to generate unique emotions in its actors despite the lack of some components that had accompanied its history for over a century.

The tears of Nicolas Massu, captain of the Chilean national team, after the victory of the decisive match by Alejandro Tabilo over Peruvian Ignacio Buse summarise what Davis Cup means in that country, in which there are entire areas devastated by fires and whose populations were mentioned by the former Olympic gold medalist: “This victory is for those who are going through a difficult time – said Massu in front of the packed stands of the Estadio Nacional in Santiago even though it was already past midnight – in the hope that it can bring them at least a little happiness.”

The tie between Chile and Peru, won 3-2 by the hosts, reminded everyone, in case it was needed, of the charm of the “home and away” component of the Davis Cup, that is when one of the teams hosts the opponent on their own turf. But he wasn’t the only one: the tie decided in the third set tie-break in the deciding singles between Argentina and Kazakhstan, played on clay in Rosario, in which Sebastian Baez angrily snatched the last four points against Dmitry Popko, as the light was fading in the Argentine summer evening, provided a moment of great emotional intensity.

And it is worth noting that nothing has been taken away from the drama of these matches by the distance of the two sets out of three of all the matches: the “best of five” would have lengthened the matches and made some of these clashes as epic as perhaps impossible to follow by a television audience that cannot have entire days available (and it would have been three days instead of two) to follow Davis Cup matches.

This year the ITF has granted greater flexibility on the scheduling of matches: when this new formula debuted, the “home and away” ties had to be played on Friday and Saturday, to leave Sunday as a travel day for players who had to reach the venue of the next tournament. However, we have now seen different variations, with some host countries deciding to play on Saturday and Sunday to maximize the attendance of the crowd. The match between Ukraine and the USA even took place on Thursday and Friday in Vilnius, Lithuania, to facilitate the return of American players to Dallas, home of the next ATP tournament.

This Davis Cup formula is not perfect, this has been clear for quite some time. And the ITF, now back in control of the event after the failure of the Kosmos experiment, is going ahead in a succession of trials and errors trying to fit a round peg in a square hole, or rather safeguarding what good things the old Davis Cup formula still had by mixing them with the new element of the round-robin groups which significantly simplifies players’ lives, makes the competition logistically more predictable and, most importantly, limits the total cost of the competition.

The solution with the four groups in September and the knockout finals in November seems promising, but there are still too many matches played in front of half-empty arenas populated by only a few hundred fans. The groupings in a single venue, if on the one hand allow for more efficient logistical planning and limit unexpected changes of surface for the players, on the other hand in some cases remove the crowd factor which has very often been the essence of historic Davis Cup matches. One of the pillars of Kosmos’ vision, the ”World Cup of Tennis”, immediately proved to be an unattainable chimera, and that’s where Kosmos’ entire business plan started to crumble. Expecting tennis to have a sufficient number of fans willing to travel across the world to follow their national team, and do so every year, has proven to be completely unrealistic.

It is necessary to find corrective measures to bring the atmosphere of “home and away” ties to the arenas of round-robin groups. And one of these corrective measures could be to group the teams taking into consideration some geographic criteria. Up to this moment all the round-robin groups of the “new Davis Cup” have been played in Europe: many of the top players are European, most of the teams competing are European, and therefore it was a quite logical consequence. But if we look at the list of the 16 teams qualified for the September 2024 groups, we will notice that there are five teams from the American continent: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the USA.

If it were possible to organize a grouping with four of these national teams in North America, Davis Cup would benefit immensely: a week-long event in a large arena in Canada or the USA, in a city with a strong immigrant component in which each of the South American national teams could count on a base of “local” fans, with the strong historical rivalries of these national teams (for example Canada vs USA, Argentina vs Brazil, Argentina vs Chile just to name a few) creating an incandescent atmosphere in the stands.

American players should not travel to Europe after the US Open and before the Asian swing, at that time NBA basketball and NHL hockey have not yet started, so it should not be difficult to find the availability of one of the iconic arenas in the United States or Canada. Furthermore, in this way, television broadcasters would also benefit as they would have some matches staggered by time zone instead of having four events almost all at the same time in Europe. Not to mention that American broadcasters would be able to show the ties of their own teams at more comfortable times, rather than early in the morning.

If we think about it, even American professional leagues such as the NBA and the NHL have created “divisions”, sub-groupings that require some teams to face each other more often than others, which not only limits the travel days in the very busy calendars of professional leagues but they are also designed to fuel historic rivalries in order to create an ever-increasing number of matches that can ignite the interest of fans.

The Davis Cup needs to find a similar mechanism to ensure that fewer and fewer aseptic matches are played in the echoing void of a deserted arena. In a few weeks the draw will decide the four September groups, when at least two of the three venues seem more or less safe (Bologna, Valencia and probably one in the United Kingdom). Last year the fourth venue for the September groups was Split, in Croatia, but this year Croatia will not take part in the Final stage after the defeat at home against Belgium last weekend. It will be unlikely that the ballot box will deliver an “entirely American group, but for the Davis Cup and for tennis it would be a godsend. Let’s hope the ITF can spot this enormous opportunity and acts accordingly.

Continue Reading

Comments

Djokovic Reminds Everyone In Turn And Around The World Who Is The Tennis Boss

Published

on

image via ATP Twitter

The season ending Nitto ATP Finals is a singularly sparkling showcase for the top eight players in the world, a tournament that ends the season in men’s tennis on a high note with so many sparkling matchups, and a celebration of how stirring a spectacle the indoor game can be. With two round robin groups comprised of four players each leading into straightforward, single elimination semifinals and final, there is an intrigue surrounding the festivities at this tournament that does not even remotely resemble any other event.

This time around in Turin, the round robin produced some majestic tennis, and the keynote performer was none other than the swashbuckling Italian Jannik Sinner. He kept Italian hopes exceedingly high all week long, taking all three matches he played in the round robin before eclipsing Daniil Medvedev for the third time in a row to claim a place in the most significant final of his career. Among those he defeated in round robin play was none other than Novak Djokovic. Sinner was riding high, raising expectations all across his nation, and making everyone stand up and pay close attention to him and his exploits.

But what too many learned observers failed to recognize was that Djokovic is the ultimate big match player. He can turn himself into an entirely different player when he has a mission on his mind and whenever he feels the need to redefine himself to his fellow players and the tennis world at large. Moreover, after winning two of his three round robin clashes but being pushed to three sets in all of them, he was dissatisfied with his level of play and determined to prove to himself that he could win a record breaking seventh ATP Finals crown and perform at the loftiest heights when the stakes were greatest and the pressure was on.

Embed from Getty Images

The tennis that Djokovic unleashed over the weekend in Turin across the semifinal and final may very well have surpassed anything he put on display in winning three of the four majors in 2023. It was almost inarguably the best he has summoned all year long because he clearly wanted to conclude the 2023 tournament campaign with a flourish and use his triumphant run in Italy to roar into the year ahead with force, conviction, persuasion and the utmost of confidence.

Given the opportunity to avenge his loss to Sinner five days after they had met in the round robin, Djokovic was well aware that he had been too conservative in that initial appointment. Both players won 109 points in that memorable round robin duel, but it was Sinner who had been unmistakably bolder on the biggest points, particularly down the homestretch. Djokovic recognized swiftly that he would need to make amends if he got a second chance against Sinner, and he did just that.

From the outset in the final, Djokovic was outhitting Sinner from the backcourt, serving with uncanny precision and purpose, taking matters entirely into his own hands, and playing the match on his own terms. He was setting the tactical agenda.

Above all else, the ease with which Djokovic was holding serve was creating a tension in Sinner that was almost tangible. The first game was thematic. Djokovic held at love, releasing a pair of aces in the process. On his way to 2-1, the Serbian produced two more aces and held at 15. Sinner established a 40-15 lead in the fourth game but a serve-and-volley combination did not do the job. Djokovic beat him with a topspin lob winner before the 22-year-old lost the next two points with errant forehands, although he should have challenged the second one because his forehand clipped the baseline.

At break point down, Sinner overcooked another forehand, sending it wide, allowing Djokovic the luxury of a 3-1 lead. Djokovic surged to 4-1 at the cost of only one point and then advanced to 5-2 at love with an ace, a service winner and two more unreturned serves. Serving for the set at 5-3, Djokovic did not allow Sinner a point as he closed out the set 6-3 very commandingly. In five service games, he won 20 of 22 points, connected with 73% of his first serves, and aced Sinner seven times. He made two unforced errors over the course of nine games.

Embed from Getty Images

The 36-year-old built on his momentum by breaking Sinner at love to start the second set before holding at love to reach 2-0, sending out his eighth and ninth aces in that game. By the time a masterful Djokovic reached 0-30 in the third game, he had won 14 consecutive points and was threatening to break the contest wide open. Later in that third game he had three break points but Sinner erased the first with an unanswerable 115 MPH second serve down the T. Djokovic had a golden opportunity on the second but his forehand down the line passing shot which had Sinner beaten cold bounded off the net cord and landed wide. He had a third break point that Sinner saved with an ace. After three deuces, Sinner tenuously held on.

Djokovic was unswayed, holding at love for 3-1 with three straight aces followed by a service winner. But he was given his sternest test yet in the sixth game, falling behind 15-40. And yet a service winner out wide saved the first break point and another effective first serve coaxed a backhand return error from Sinner, enabling Djokovic to make it back to deuce. He took the next two points confidently for a 4-2 lead.

Once more, Djokovic made a concerted effort to get the insurance break. With Sinner serving in the seventh game, there were eight deuces and Sinner did not hold until his seventh game point after Djokovic had two break points that he squandered with a sliced backhand error and a miscalculation on a Sinner forehand that landed on the sideline and left the Serbian unprepared. Sinner secured that arduous hold with an ace, leaving Djokovic apprehensive about another missed chance.

Serving with new balls at 4-3, Djokovic trailed 0-30, but eventually held from deuce, finishing off that somewhat shaky hold with his 13th ace. Now Sinner was serving to stay in the match in the ninth game and, despite an ace for 30-30, he was broken at 30 on his lone double fault of the match. Djokovic emerged victorious 6-3, 6-3. His triumph can be attributed to two primary virtues: the quality of his first and second serves, and his blend of firepower and consistency from the backcourt. He was hitting his forehand considerably harder than Sinner, which is no mean feat. He won 38 of 46 points on serve altogether, most notably 29 of 32 on his first serve. And he never allowed Sinner to get comfortable from the backcourt, keeping the Italian at bay with pace and persistence off both sides.

Djokovic was no less dazzling in his dismantling of Alcaraz in the penultimate round. Every time they had met prior to this collision, Djokovic and Alcaraz had played matches that would not be classified as one-sided. Not one of their four previous duels had ended in straight sets. Alcaraz took their first contest in a final set tie-break on clay in Madrid 18 months ago. The Serbian and the Spaniard split two spectacular sets at Roland Garros this year in the semifinals before Djokovic prevailed 6-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-1. Alcaraz had started cramping late in the second set.

In the Wimbledon final back in July, Alcaraz succeeded in five sets and then they did battle in the final of Cincinnati with Djokovic saving a match point in the second set tie-break before pulling out a gratifying victory in a third set tie-break. That spellbinding battle lasted nearly four hours.

Most members of the tennis cognoscenti were expecting another razor thin margin between the two best players in the world at Turin, but for the first time Djokovic defeated Alcaraz handily on the fast indoor hard court. It did not look like a romp in the early stages. Djokovic was down 15-40 in the opening game when Alcaraz drove a two-hander wide off the net cord. Djokovic’s 116 MPH second serve down the T put him in charge of the next point and Alcaraz missed his second shot off the forehand. A service winner and an ace took Djokovic out of danger and into a 1-0 lead.

But Alcaraz was serving up a storm. He made 14 first serves in a row and took 12 of 16 points on his delivery en route to 3-3. Djokovic had worked his way out of another difficult service game at 2-2 that went to two deuces as Alcaraz blasted away freely off the ground. But the 20-year-old Spaniard lost his range off the backhand in the eighth game and Djokovic broke him for a 5-3 lead. The Serbian then held at love with an ace out wide to seal the set 6-3.

Djokovic was pummeling away at Alcaraz’s backhand and keeping the Spaniard ill at ease and off balance. He broke for 2-1 in the second set, held easily for 3-1 and nearly gained another break in the fifth game. Alcaraz’s saved a break point and then found renewed inspiration when Djokovic served in the sixth game. Three rallies in that game lasted between 20 and 24 strokes. The Spaniard showed off his astounding speed and shotmaking versatility. At 15-15, Djokovic had Alcaraz on a string, moving him from corner to corner, controlling the rally ruthlessly. But Alcaraz somehow recovered, shifted from defense to offense and stunned the approving audience and his opponent with a forehand winner. He advanced to 15-40 with a forehand volley winner down the line.

Clearly the Spaniard believed he was about to break back and change the color of the contest. But Djokovic had other notions. A service winner down the T took him to 30-40. Now he had to defend steadfastly, but he did just that. On the 23rd shot of a fierce exchange, he angled a forehand crosscourt passing shot into the clear. From deuce he put away a forehand swing volley and then hit a service winner to reach 4-2. Djokovic was not complacent. He went full force after another service break in the seventh game and achieved it. After a 24 stroke exchange, he elicited a forehand error from the Spaniard to reach 5-2, and then easily served it out in the following game to finish off a satisfying 6-3, 6-2 victory over his chief rival all year in the battle for No. 1. Despite getting 84% of his first serves in and serving ten aces, Alcaraz was trounced by a top of the line Djokovic.

Embed from Getty Images

The Djokovic who toppled Alcaraz and Sinner was not playing the same brand of tennis in the round robin stage of the tournament in Turin. He had come into the event knowing he needed only one round robin victory to seal an eighth year-end No. 1 world ranking. That was his overriding goal. Pete Sampras concluded six consecutive (and total) years at No. 1. Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Jimmy Connors all ended five years at the top. Djokovic was determined to separate himself even more from those luminaries in this department, and he was well aware that he could add to his record for time spent at the top of the rankings to 400 weeks following Turin. Federer is in second place at 310 weeks.

So Djokovic took great pride in his dual achievement of eight year end finishes at No. 1 as well as 400 weeks. He secured that honor by taking his opening round robin match over Holger Rune 7-6 (4), 6-7 (1), 6-3. He was far from his zenith against the 20-year-old Dane. He did play a disciplined opening set tie-break but the second set tie-break was dismal from Djokovic’s end of the court. Even with Rune struggling physically in the final set and seemingly spent, Djokovic was below par but from 2-2 he took three games in a row. At 5-3 he held at love to close out the account. 

The next day Djokovic was honored by the ATP with an on court ceremony for his No. 1 accomplishment. He returned the following evening to face Sinner, who had already easily dismissed Stefanos Tsitsipas in straight sets. Djokovic played good but not great tennis in this match, while Sinner was feeding off the crowd, performing magnificently. At 4-5, 15-30 in the first set, Sinner was fortunate when Djokovic inexplicably attempted a sliced backhand when he could have driven that shot. He missed it long. In the next game, Djokovic led 40-0 but Sinner swept three points in a row. At deuce, Djokovic double faulted and Sinner took the next point with calculated aggression. The Italian had the break and closed out the set unhesitatingly. Djokovic was twice down a mini-break in the second set tie-break but he rallied to win it seven points to five.

Sinner broke Djokovic to lead 4-2 in the third set but the Serbian retaliated in the following game. It all came down to a tie-break and Sinner was unstoppable. He won the first five points and pulled away to defeat Djokovic for the first time in four career appointments despite 20 aces from the Serbian. Sinner won 7-5, 6-7 (5), 7-6 (2).

Matters got complicated in that group. Tsitsipas retired with a back injury after trailing 2-1 in the first set against Rune. He was replaced by Hubert Hurkacz. Djokovic recouped from his loss to Sinner and beat the big serving Polish player 7-6 (1), 4-6, 6-1. Hurkacz did not miss a first serve in the tie-break but Djokovic was tremendous on his returns. The only point he lost was on his own serve at 6-0. But Hurkacz broke Djokovic once in the second set and was unyielding on his delivery. Not until the third set did Hurkacz’s level recede. His first serve percentage dropped to 45% with only ten first serves landing in the box. Seven of those ten were aces. He had 24 for the match.

Djokovic finished round robin play with a 2-1 record but only a 5-4 winning record in sets. That meant Rune could join Sinner in the semifinals from the Green Group if he beat the Italian that evening. Djokovic’s fate was in Sinner’s hands. Some wondered if Sinner might want to spare himself a potential rematch with Djokovic in the final by deliberately losing to Rune. But they failed to recognize that Sinner is a professional through and through. He was not going to give anything less than his best. He has a lot of integrity.

Sinner crushed Rune in the first set but dropped a tight second set. His back seemed to be bothering him. But he battled on gallantly in the third set and fended off a break point against him at 3-4. A body serve from the Italian drew an errant down the line backhand return from the Dane. Sinner came through 6-2, 5-7, 6-4 and saved Djokovic from missing out on the semifinals. Sinner finished first in the Green Group and Djokovic second.

Embed from Getty Images

In the Red Group, Daniil Medvedev had won his first two matches over Andrey Rublev and Sascha Zverev, prevailing in straight sets both times. His semifinal place was assured. But the other semifinalist from that group was up in the air. Alcaraz had lost a hard fought and well played encounter against Zverev 6-7 (3), 6-3, 6-4. It was perhaps Zverev’s best performance of the 2023 season. But then he lost to Medvedev. On the last day of round robin competition it all came down to Alcaraz confronting Medvedev with victory assuring him of a semifinal slot. More confident after beating Rublev in straight sets, Alcaraz avenged his U.S. Open loss to Medvedev with a 6-4, 6-4 triumph. The Spaniard kept Medvedev completely at bay with his capacity to attack at opportune times. He never lost his serve.

And so Alcaraz won the Red Group and Medvedev finished second. Medvedev was determined to prevent Sinner from ousting him for the third time in a row after winning their first six head to head contests. But Sinner was too composed. In the first set Sinner was up 40-0 at 1-1 but had bail himself out from break point down before holding on. Then Medvedev led 40-0 at 1-2 but lost his serve primarily on surprising mistakes. Sinner held from 0-30 in the fifth game and moved on to 4-1. Sinner took that set comfortably in the end, but Medvedev served with clinical efficiency in the second set.

He then left the court to get help from an ATP physiotherapist for an apparent ailing hip. Sinner rolled in the third set as Medvedev emotionally imploded. The Italian won 6-3, 6-7 (4), 6-1. A nation anticipated a significant breakthrough for the world No. 4. But their dream was hit by a hard reality. Nonetheless, he was the best player outside of Djokovic in the second half of 2023. He made it to his first major semifinal at Wimbledon, won the Masters 1000 title in Toronto and then added tournament wins in Beijing and Vienna before his runner-up showing in Turin.

History was largely on Djokovic’s side in the final. In the 47 previous editions of the ATP Finals when played under the round robin followed by a single elimination semifinals and final round format, there had been 26 times when a player who lost a round robin match went on to win the tournament. Djokovic had done it twice himself. In 2008 he was defeated by Nikolay Davydenko in the round robin but he came back to beat Davydenko in the final. Seven years later, he was beaten by Federer in the round robin but stopped the Swiss Maestro in the final.

Moreover, Djokovic had time to accept his round robin loss to Sinner and move on, and was surely motivated by the opportunity to get some revenge. He wanted that record of seven titles at the ATP Finals that he had previously shared with Federer, and was delighted to win his seventh title in twelve tournament appearances this season. The last year he won as many as seven tournaments was back in 2016. This was also his 98th career ATP Tour singles championship and so Djokovic is now only five titles behind Federer and eleven in back of the leader Connors.

History is still the driving force that fuels Novak Djokovic, and he won’t shy away from any pursuit that will enhance his legacy and enlarge his reputation. No wonder Djokovic was saying in Turin that he considers 2023 to be one of his finest seasons. This was the fourth year in his shining career that Djokovic has won three majors. It was the third time he reached all four Grand Slam finals in a season. He wraps up this season with a pair of Masters 1000 titles and the fifth biggest tournament of them all— the ATP Finals—backing up his stellar record at the Grand Slam events. After losing to Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final, Djokovic closed his season with victories in his last four tournaments—Cincinnati, the U.S. Open, Rolex Paris Masters and ATP Finals— as well as winning 22 of his last 23 matches as he heads into Davis Cup this week. Conversely, Alcaraz did not win a tournament after taking his sixth title of the season at Wimbledon.

For Djokovic to be so prolific at 36 is nothing short of stupendous. Djokovic should have another two prodigious years ahead of him. I remain convinced he will win at least three or four majors over the next couple of seasons, and he will push hard to break the Connors tournament titles record. Sooner or later his supply of ambition will diminish, but, for at least another few years, Novak Djokovic will remain the game’s central figure, the premier match player in tennis and a champion of enduring excellence who seems in so many ways to be getting better with the passing years as he zeroes in on his chief targets with a ferocity and purpose that no one else can match.

Embed from Getty Images

Continue Reading

Comments

Seventh Paris Bercy Triumph is the Most Rewarding for Djokovic

The confidence of Novak Djokovic is high heading into the ATP Finals in Turin.

Published

on

Novak Djokovic (@AustralianOpen - Twitter)

He had not played a tournament since securing his 24th major at the U.S. Open on September 10— or a match of any kind since representing Serbia in Davis Cup the following week—using that time to rest his body, ease his mind and zero in on the arduous path ahead. He was probably not expecting too much from himself at the Rolex Paris Masters after being away from the competitive world of professional tennis for such a long time.

As if he did not have enough to worry about upon his return to the ATP Tour, he then was hit hard by a stomach ailment midweek in Paris that complicated matters considerably.

Be that as it may, Novak Djokovic somehow survived a harrowing week in France and ultimately collected his 40th Masters 1000 crown, his 97th career singles championship, and his sixth title of 2023 in only eleven 2023 tournament appearances. Despite obvious discomfort and a string of three excruciating encounters leading up to the final that pushed him to his absolute limits and tested comprehensively not only his physical durability  but, even more so, his emotional stability, Djokovic moved past his difficulties and found victory deservedly in the end. The biggest weapon in tennis these days is his incomparable mind.

Djokovic’s final round triumph over a revitalized Grigor Dimitrov was straightforward and largely devoid of suspense because the Serbian was immensely disciplined and resolute. He did not face a break point in nine service games across two sets, dissecting his adversary 6-4, 6-3 with his usual pride and professionalism. From start to finish, Djokovic was determined to finish this piece of business swiftly and methodically, and he did just that.

In the early stages, Djokovic was somewhat apprehensive, falling behind 15-30 in the second game on his serve and trailing 0-30 when he served at 1-2. But he met those moments with his usual clarity and conviction. In the latter of those games, he was particularly impressive. On the 0-30 point he opened up the court with a backhand crosscourt approach that set up a scintillating backhand angled drop volley winner. He followed with a service winner down the T, coaxed an error off the Dimitrov backhand slice, and then took his fourth point in a row by sending Dimitrov side to side with controlled aggression until he elicited an error.

At 3-3, Djokovic made his move. His returns in that entire seventh game were remarkable. At 30-40, Dimitrov sent a first serve wide to the Djokovic backhand that should have been a point winner.  Yet Djokovic lunged to his left, blocked the return back low and short, and provoked a netted a topspin backhand from Dimitrov.

Djokovic had the break for 4-3 and made it count. He held at love with two service winners and an ace to reach 5-3. Serving for the set two games later, Djokovic advanced to 40-30 but netted a forehand off an effective Dimitrov backhand slice. But then Djokoivic profited from a pair of errant backhand slices from his opponent, and the set belonged to the cagey favorite 6-4.

At 2-2 in the second set, Djokovic made a solid backhand return on break point that Dimitrov mistakenly thought he could control with a topspin backhand down the line reply. That shot landed long, and allowed Djokovic to move in front 3-2. He held at love for 4-2 with an ace out wide in the ad court and then had a break point for 5-2 that Dimitrov erased with a gutsy inside out forehand forcing an error.

The 32-year-old Bulgarian held on gamely in that seventh game, but Djokovic was unflustered. Serving at 4-3, 30-30, he released consecutive first serves down the T and Dimitrov could not get either one back in play. Djokovic moved to 5-3, and then determined that it was closing time, opening the ninth game with a scorching  backhand down the line winner. Dimitrov took the next two points but double faulted for 30-30. Now Djokovic went for the inside out backhand second serve return winner and made it. On match point at 30-40, he looped a forehand inside out and drew the error he wanted.

Djokovic had prevailed 6-4, 6-3. The 36-year-old connected with 67% of his first serves, winning 81% of those points. He won 11 of 16 second serve points (69%). He played the match on his terms, setting the tempo he wanted, keeping Dimitrov at bay from beginning to end, defeating his old rival and friend for the 12th time in 13 career meetings. The week had concluded almost the way it started, when Djokovic commenced his campaign for his seventh Rolex Masters Paris title with a routine 6-3, 6-2 victory over Argentina’s Tomas Etcheverry in 84 efficient minutes.

But that appointment on Wednesday November 1 was followed by three rugged skirmishes that Djokovic had to navigate with the greatest of care just to survive.

The first of these battles was against the 27-year-old Tallon Griekspoor. In two previous duels with the Dutchman, Djokovic had triumphed without much trouble. But this time he drifted dangerously close to defeat against the world No. 21.

Djokovic surged to a 4-1 first set lead and then served at 4-2, 40-15. He challenged a call on the sideline, believing the ball had landed wide. It hit the line. Griekspoor broke back and had a new lease on life. He won five games in a row to steal the set, with Djokovic looking more and more listless with each passing moment. He called for the tournament doctor, who gave him a pill for his ailing stomach.

He remained almost zombie-like for a while, but gradually found a trace of intensity—if no more than that. At 4-4, Djokovic held on from 15-40 with some clutch serving. They travelled to a tie-break, and here Djokovic at last looked like the essential Djokovic, taking it seven points to two with regal authority.

And yet, the tension was not over. Although Griekspoor was not teeing off and lacing second serve returns with the same relish he had earlier, he still was fighting fiercely. Griekspoor made it back to 4-4 in that final set when Djokovic double faulted at break point down in the eighth game. The crowd cheered heartily after that point, with some perhaps wanting more tennis and others hoping for the Serbian’s demise. Djokovic egged them on by raising his arms defiantly while smiling almost ironically, knowing that he thrives so often when confronted by an acrimonious audience. Djokovic proceeded to run off eight consecutive points, completing a 4-6, 7-6 (2), 6-4 win and moving into the quarterfinals.

Waiting for Djokovic there was the young fellow who had upended him in the final a year ago on the same court. In fact, by virtue of that win in Paris one year ago, Holger Rune established himself as the only player ever to beat Djokovic from a set down in a Masters 1000 final. Djokovic has won 31 of 32 finals at that level over the course of his career after winning the opening set.

Moreover, Rune had toppled Djokovic again in another three set match on the clay at Rome earlier this year. They had not met since. Needless to say, but Djokovic does not take kindly to losing against anyone three times in a row. Another point of intrigue surrounding this quarterfinal confrontation: Djokovic’s former coach Boris Becker was now in Rune’s corner.

Rune had endured a terrible slump this year after moving into the top five in the world and reaching the quarterfinals of Wimbledon. He had back problems and went into a disconcerting tailspin that no one could have anticipated. Before he joined forces with Becker in Basel, Rune had lost eight of his last nine matches. His swagger was gone. He was not the same player we had witnessed over the past year.

But, with Becker by his side, Rune made it to the semifinals of Basel, and then played well on his way to the showdown with Djokovic in Paris. His creativity on the court, his willingness to get to the net commandingly, his bold second serve speeds— all of these qualities make Rune a compelling performer. Djokovic seemed to be feeling better than he had the day before against Griekspoor, but remained subdued.

Nonetheless, he was in good form, as was Rune. The first set was settled by one break in the twelfth game with Rune serving at 5-6. He reached game point for a potential tie-break but Djokovic persisted and reached set point. He came forward, punched a forehand volley low, and then put away a backhand swing volley from close range that landed on the line.

Djokovic sealed the crucial opening set 7-5. After an early exchange of breaks in the second, he then reached match point with Rune serving at 4-5. But the 20-year-old Dane audaciously sent an impeccably placed and unstoppable first serve down the T to save it. They went to a tie-break and improbably Djokovic was the player who faltered. For only the sixth time in 33 tie-breaks this year he was beaten, but it was more a case of self inflicted wounds from Djokovic (including a double fault at 1-3) than Rune’s shining play that allowed the Dane to prevail seven points to three.

At the end of that sequence, however, Rune was cramping. Djokovic took a bathroom break and when play resumed Rune was not unduly inhibited. But with some expert use of the lob and his customary court sense, Djokovic broke early in the third set and never looked back, serving beautifully to win 20 of 23 points on his delivery including five aces. In two hours and 54 minutes of hard fought and high quality tennis, Djokovic was victorious 7-5, 6-7 (7-3), 6-4.

His next assignment was a semifinal against Andrey Rublev. Djokovic had won four of their five previous confrontations including a come from behind four set victory in their most recent battle at Wimbledon.

Rublev has undoubtedly played the finest tennis of his career in 2023. He won the Masters 1000 title at Monte Carlo over Rune and was runner-up to Hubert Hurkacz in the Shanghai Masters 1000 tournament. His explosive backcourt game featuring one of the biggest forehands in the sport— along with a significantly improved backhand that he takes down the line more frequently— have made Rublev a more formidable player across the board

But the Rublev who showed up to play Djokovic indoors in Paris was combining power, purpose and reliability with a persuasiveness he has perhaps never exhibited before. It was breathtaking to observe the tennis he produced on this occasion. When Djokovic broke Rublev with some stunning running forehands in the opening game, it looked like business as usual for the world No. 1.

But the 36-year-old wasted four game points in the second game and an unbending Rublev broke right back. From that juncture, Rublev had the upper hand for most of the first set. By the middle of that set, Djokovic was clearly suffering to some degree with the stomach issue, looking wan and moving with much less alacrity than normal. With Rublev walloping his ground strokes ruthlessly and hardly missing despite unleashing one gargantuan shot after another, Djokovic was on his heels and fighting just to stay afloat.

At 3-4 in that first set, Djokovic held on from 0-40 with a stream of aces and service winners and at 4-5 the scenario was similar. In that tenth game he was down 0-30 but an ace got him back on track and he swept four points in a row to reach 5-5. Rublev was not perturbed. With Djokovic serving at 5-6, 30-30, Rublev’s return set up an outright winner and then Djokovic surprisingly tried a drop shot off Rublev’s return. It did not even reach the net. Set to Rublev, 7-5.

Once more, Djokovic found himself in a precarious place, down a set against a top five player who was playing arguably the match of his life. In the second game of the second set, Djokovic was down break point but he released a service winner down the T to bail himself out and advanced to 1-1. At 2-2, he had Rublev down 0-40 but the Russian held on with the help of a net cord winner at 30-40. He then saved another break point at 3-3 with a forehand inside out winner.

Twice in the latter stages of that hard fought set, Djokovic had to serve to stay in the match. He was three points from losing at 4-5, 15-15 but defended magnificently out of his forehand corner to reach 30-15, connected immaculately with a forehand inside in winner for 40-15, and aced Rublev out wide to hold for 5-5 at 15. Serving at 5-6 he was down 0-15 and three points from defeat again, but took four points in a row once more with immense poise under pressure.

Now they settled the second set in a tie-break. The players were locked at 2-2 when Djokovic went to work as only he can in these critical sequences. He coaxed an error from Rublev to get the mini-break for 3-2 and then defended with extraordinary determination as Rublev had him scurrying all over the court. Djokovic worked his way back to a neutral position and then employed a short and low backhand chip to draw Rublev in and make him miss.

It was 4-2 for an inspired Djokovic. A service winner down the T took him to 5-2. After an ace from Rublev made it 5-3, Djokovic took an excellent first serve wide from Rublev and rifled his return crosscourt for a dazzling winner. At 6-3, he closed that tie-break out with an ace out wide in the ad court. The 7-3 tie-break triumph was classic Djokovic.

And yet, he was hurting. On the first point of that tie-break, Djokovic had lunged to reach for a backhand return off a big serve from Rublev, aggravating his back. Djokovic took a bathroom break and then called for the trainer, who rubbed his back. Fortunately, he was able to pick up where he left off and keep elevating his game.

Nevertheless, Rublev was not wilting— not in the least. But he was under siege by an opponent who was no longer believing he could lose.

With Rublev serving at 1-2 in the third set, Djokovic had 15-40 and double break point but he netted a backhand crosscourt passing shot. Rublev held on with tenacity. Djokovic was creating scoreboard pressure on Rublev but also holding swiftly and confidently, winning 24 of 29 points on serve in that final set. Rublev later served at 4-5, 0-30, but missed only one first serve on the next four points and closed out that game with an ace for 5-5. Djokovic held at love for 6-5 with an ace and a perfectly packaged serve-and-volley point in that game, and now Rublev served for the second time to stay in the match.

This time, he did not succeed.

Djokovic was defending stupendously in this game. He outmaneuvered Rublev from the baseline twice to reach 0-30 before Rublev put away an overhead. But Djokovic was unrelenting now. A deep backhand down the line forced an error from Rublev to make it 15-40. Cruelly, Rublev double faulted long off the net cord going down the T on the next point and victory belonged to Djokovic 5-7, 7-6 (3), 7-5 in just over three hours of spellbinding tennis. I put that match right up there among the top five men’s contests of the year. Outside of the majors, this was the best with the exception of Djokovic’s 5-7, 7-6 (9-7), 7-6 (7-4) win over Alcaraz in the Cincinnati final.

Undoubtedly the week was almost all about Djokovic and his seventh title run at the Rolex Paris Masters. But not entirely.

Dimitrov deserves high marks for finishing his season with such an inspired run and rising again into the top 15 in the world. After he concluded 2017 at No. 3 in the world when he won the ATP Finals, he has fought in vain to stay in that territory while simultaneously setting high standards. But this year he has played his best tennis since 2017 and arguably his game is at an even higher level.

He toppled Alcaraz on his way to the semifinals of Shanghai, which in some ways set the stage for the Bulgarian’s excellent run in Paris. He started his journey in France with a three set win over Lorenzo Musetti. In the second round he avenged a hard fought loss he had suffered in Vienna against No. 3 seed Daniil Medvedev. Aside from the Djokovic-Rublev contest, this was the most compelling match of the week. 

Dimitrov took the first set from Medvedev but dropped the second before gaining the upper hand again in the third. He served for the match at 5-3 and had four match points, but failed to get a first serve in on any of them. Later, at 5-6, Medvedev faced two more match points, managing to escape. But Dimitrov refused to lose his composure or abandon his game plan. He raced to a 5-0 final set tie-break lead and closed it out seven points to two for one of the most impressive victories of his career. Dimitrov won by scores of 6-3, 6-7 (7-4), 7-6 (7-2).

In the round of 16, Dimitrov toppled Alexander Bublik 6-2, 6-2 before ousting Hurkacz 6-1,4-6, 6-4 as the Polish player lost his outside chance to qualify as one of the elite eight players for Turin. But Dimitrov was not done with his exploits.

He played a tremendous match against Stefanos Tsitsipas in the semifinals. The Greek stylist had won six of his seven career contests against Dimitrov, but this was a week when the Bulgarian was in a different mindset and not preoccupied with the past. Dimitrov completely outplayed Tsitsipas in the first set and then had two break points at 4-4 in the second. But Tsitsipas knifed a forehand volley into the clear and saved the other with a penetrating forehand off a net cord return from an unlucky Dimitrov.

Tsitsipas was too good in winning the second set in a tie-break and then had four break points at 1-1 in the third— the only ones he would create all match long. Dimitrov held on steadfastly. That final set also went to a tie-break and in this one Dimitrov was out of this world. He produced four winners in that sequence including three sparkling passing shots, and took the match by the same scoreline as his Medvedev encounter: 6-3, 6-7 (7-1), 7-6 (7-3). Dimitrov was outclassed by a better player in the final, but the fact remained that he had ended his year in style. The last time he had been in a Masters 1000 final was six years ago in Cincinnati when he took the title over Nick Kyrgios.

Now the stage is set for the Nitto ATP Finals in Turin, which starts on November 12. The defending champion Djokovic will be the clear favorite as he chases a seventh crown in that season ending tournament for the top eight players. Carlos Alcaraz— beaten in the second round of Paris by the Russian Roman Safiullin 6-3, 6-4 after being up a break in both sets—will be trying to break out of a slump after dealing with two injury issues recently. He has not won a tournament since his stirring five set, final round clash with Djokovic at Wimbledon.

The two other main contenders will be world No. 3 Medvedev—the 2020 champion—and world No. 4 Jannik Sinner, who is coming off his greatest season yet and looking forward to performing commendably for his home country’s fans. Rounding out the field are Rublev,  2019 champion Tsitsipas, 2018 and 2021 champion Sascha Zverev, and Rune.

It is an excellent cast with some enticing matchups. Djokovic is, of course, the man to beat. But based on recent form I must give Sinner the next best chance. Medvedev has not won a tournament since Rome. Neither he nor Alcaraz will be that confident going into the tournament, although that could change during the week. But Djokovic is riding high after another significant tournament win, and Sinner will be confident after stopping Medvedev in two finals this autumn at Beijing and Vienna. Although he dropped out of the Rolex Paris Masters after winning his opening match over Mackenzie McDonald at the ungodly hour of 2:37 AM, Sinner will be rested for Turin and should be ready to go.

Djokovic will have a week to recover from the rigors of Paris, and some of the pressure on him to defend will be removed. With a 1490 point lead over Alcaraz in the ATP Race. Djokovic has almost a lock on an eighth year-end No. 1 ranking, so he should be able to keep his mind on the task at hand in Turin and, with an uncluttered mind, give himself the best possible chance to succeed in Italy. I can’t wait for this year end festival to unfold.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending