EXCLUSIVE: ‘I've Been Contacted By 200 Players’ – Tennis Chief Hordorff On Why The Transition Tour Must Change - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Interviews

EXCLUSIVE: ‘I’ve Been Contacted By 200 Players’ – Tennis Chief Hordorff On Why The Transition Tour Must Change

The vice-president of the German Tennis Federation (DTB) has spoken with Ubitennis about the state of the lower level tournaments in the sport.

Published

on

The newly created ITF transition Tour was set out to give players a better standard of living and cut down the costs for tournaments hosting lower level events. On the surface, the idea is a brilliant one welcomed by many. But in reality, the outcome has been one of anger and frustration.

This year a new system is in place with ITF rankings being used for the first time. WTA points are only awarded to women playing in events that have $25,000 in prize money or more. In men’s tennis, $25,000 ITF Pro Circuit events offer both ATP ranking points (later rounds) and ITF Entry Points (all rounds); while the qualifying rounds of ATP Challenger tournaments also offer both ATP ranking points (all events) and ITF Entry Points (events up to $125,000 in prize money). Players can use their ITF ranking to enter into professional tournaments.

There is a growing frustration among players with many saying that it is harder for them to get into tournaments compared to 12 months ago. Some of those have even lost their ranking from last year due to the size of the tour being reduced. On top of that, the draws have also been made smaller.

Dirk Hordorff is one of the most vocal critics of the changes. The vice-president of the German Tennis Federation has extensive experience within the sport. Besides his position as vice-president, Hordorff has worked with players such as Rainer Schuettler, Yen-Hsun and has been a Davis Cup coach for Taiwan. Today, he is working as a mentor to both Janko Tipsarevic and Vasek Pospisil.

“Right now I am in Thailand on the challenger Tour. Every day players or Coaches are coming to me, telling me they are reading my posts on Facebook and tell me how grateful they are and how much they support my point of view.” Hordorff told Ubitennis.
“Also in Germany lots of players are having the same Problems and contacting me. There is a Facebook petition against the ITF changes where over 10000 persons already signed.
“It’s very clear that all players are suffering under this new System and don’t like it.”

To be more precise about the problem, Hordorff has said he has received a staggering 200 messages from players about their concerns. Either they are in a worse situation, can’t get into tournaments or are struggling financially. It seems that the ITF Tour is becoming more like a boulevard of broken dreams for many players.

“The number of places for players to participate in these tournaments is limited, so players with no ranking or bad ranking have no chance to participate in the tournaments.” He said.
“I’ve heard from a lot of players flying around the world, going to tournaments and couldn’t get in in reason of the limited qualification size.”

It isn’t all doom and gloom with it comes to the circuit. Many accept that under the reform it is easier for junior players to make it onto the professional circuit at a young age. Should they generate enough ITF Points. However, the older a player develops the more difficulty they face.

“For players in the ITF top 50 it may be an easier way to get into the pro circuit with Wild Cards or free places on World Tour Tournaments.” Said Hordorff.
“The pathway from juniors to pro Tennis is one good point of this Reform. On the other side, if you don’t make it earlier in the junior career the way to the pro Tennis is incredibly difficult or even there is no chance. This needs to be changed.”

The Data sales Argument

Last week, both the ITF and ATP issued statements to Ubitennis after claims made about data sales. In a Facebook post, Hordorff said the ITF refused to accept an offer made by the ATP in relation to ranking points on the men’s tour. He alleged that the ATP was willing to offer ranking points to tournaments at every level. The only condition was for the ITF to not sell their data to betting companies. In accordance to a recommendation set out be the Independent Review Panel (IRP).

“The ATP supports the IRP’s recommendation to remove the supply of data at the lowest level of professional tennis, however, this is not related to the award or allocation of ATP ranking points.” An ATP spokesman said.

Responding to the statement, Hordorff remains defiant. Saying that Chris Kermode, who is the CEO of the ATP Tour, was willing to provide ATP points to all tournaments. However, it has been claimed by Ross Hutchins that the ITF never wanted those points. Hutchins is the Chief Player Officer for the ATP.

“The official Statement of Chris Kermode at the ATP Meeting before 30 tournament directors was, that the ATP was willing to provide points, but the ITF didn’t want to have points. After the Orlando Meeting he commented, that the ITF position, that the ATP took from the futures the points away, is false and not true at all. This was confirmed last week by Ross Hutchins, that the ITF didn’t want ATP points. Why you think the ITF had this position? But if you take it word for word, there is no proof that ATP didn’t want the stop of data selling against points.”

Data sales refers to the selling of live data from tournaments (e.g. live scores of matches). The reason why the IRP recommended for it to be banned is to help tackle match-fixing at the lower level tournaments. Since 2012, the ITF has had a multi-million pound deal with Sportradar. A company that analyses and collects sports data. In the terms of the contract, the company is allowed to provide live data from all tournaments linked to the ITF.

What is next?

Whilst there is an uproar among players and coaches, it is unlikely the ITF Transition Tour will be abolished. Besides the large amount of time it took to construct the concept, it would be a PR disaster for the Governing body. However, that doesn’t mean it can’t be modified.

When Hordorff was questioned about what he would do differently, the German outlined four key areas. Ranging from the size of the draws to the ranking system. His views are similar to that of Dave Miley, who is seeking the ITF Presidency position later this year.

“I believe that one of our Goals in Leadership in Tennis should be to promote the game, let more People play Tennis, grow the Sport.” He said. “This Transition tour is the complete opposite. it Limits players to participate and have a negative Impact to the players, the Coaches, to academies, Clubs around the world. There is a change needed.”

Hordorff’s four changes
– Increase qualifying draws to a minimum of 64
– Remove the new entry fee to help players financially
– Abide by the IRP recommendation and abolish data sales
– Abolish the two ranking systems and return them back into one

So where do we go now? Should players just accept their current situation and get on with it, or is change actually achievable? The answer to that question is unclear. In theory the ITF could be forced to adjust their structure should enough tennis federations voice their concerns and vote. However, it may not be as simple as this.

“The Nation Tennis associations should have the power to make changes happen. Latest they can vote a new board at the AGM in Portugal this year, which will change this Reform and take care of the interest of the players and tournaments.” Hordorff explained.
“There are to many persons involved, who have no Knowledge about Tennis and only take care of their personal interest.” He added.

The ITF AGM meeting will not take place until the end of September. Until then, players will have to continue weathering the storm in the meantime. Meanwhile, the ITF has pledged to continue their support of their Transition Tour by holding a media conference to promote it in the coming weeks.

The second part of Ubitennis’ interview with Hordorff concerning the Davis Cup and David Haggerty will be published on Wednesday.

Davis Cup

EXCLUSIVE: Former Davis Cup Heroes Speak Out On New Changes To Competition

Ubitennis speaks with Mats Wilander, Thomas Enqvist and Mark Woodforde about the new format of the team competition.

Published

on

This weekend will see the start of a new era in men’s tennis as the revamped Davis Cup kicks off with the qualifying rounds taking place.

24 teams will battle it out for 12 places in the final of the competition in what is the new format of the event. Following approval at the ITF AGM in August, for the first time in history the finals of the competition will take place in one location over a week. A total of 18 teams are set to take part – 12 qualifiers, the four semi-finalists from the previous year and two wild cards.

The transformation has been far from simple with some players and their national association’s voicing opposition. Critics argue that the changes are too radical, ruins the tradition of the 119-year-old event, the scheduling eats into the off-season and the financial pledges that has been made are dubious. Investment firm Kosmos has pledged to invest $3 billion over a 25-year period with a promise that countries would receive more money. Something that has previously been disputed by the head of Tennis Europe.

Perhaps the best way to gage an idea of the current situation is to consult with those who has played in the competition for years. Thomas Enqvist has had the opportunity of being both player and captain for his country. The Swede compiled a win-loss record of 15-11 in the competition and won both of his singles matches during the 1996 final.

“Speaking from a player point of view, I think that all of us would say that it is a big honour to represent your country. My best memories in tennis come from the Davis Cup.” Enqvist told Ubitennis.

Sweden was one of the countries that voted for the revamp of the competition, according to a list published by the vice-president of the German Tennis Federation. The ITF never published a list of the countries that voted for or against the plans. Arguing that this was done for confidentiality reasons. Nevertheless, 44-year-old Enqvist is remaining cautiously optimistic about the changes. Arguing that people need to wait and see before they can judge.

“I think we have to give them time. We have to see. They have tried to put something on to make sure that all the top major players can play. Hopefully it’s going to be a good choice.” He said.

For Mats Wilander, the Davis Cup is one of the biggest events in a player’s career. Wilander is a former world No.1 player, who represented his country in 27 ties over a 14-year period. He helped secure the Davis Cup trophy in the final of the competition three times throughout the 1980s.

“The only reason why I am playing tennis is because of the Davis Cup.” Wilander states.
“The effect the Davis Cup has had on pretty much every player that is here today. My generation, the generation before and the generation after. The effect of the Davis Cup is much bigger than the effect of grand slams because you are watching your nation play.”

The ATP threat

If the changes aren’t enough to contend with, a new tournament poses as a potential threat to the existence of the historic competition. 2020 will see the resurrection of the World Team Cup. Overseen by the ATP,  who governs men’s tennis, the event has on offer ranking points and a prize money pool of $15 million. The tournament will be held at the start of each year, less than two months after the Davis Cup finals, in three cities across Australia.

ATP CEO Chris Kermode has previously insisted that the World Cup is not a threat to the other team events. At the official launch in November, Kermode told a crowd of reporters ‘There seems to be a fixation that the ATP Cup has caused the issue with the Davis Cup and this is not the case. If the ATP Cup didn’t exist, the Davis Cup still wouldn’t have a week in the calendar.’

Taking those words at face value, there shouldn’t be anything to worry about. Should there?

“I think only time can tell. Maybe both can prevail. I have no idea.” Enqvist admitted.

Wilander is more up front with his views. For him, the decision of hosting the Davis Cup finale in a neutral country might come back to haunt the ITF in the future. Saying that the new format has unnecessarily placed the event in a competition with the ATP Cup.

“The ATP Cup is about the team of a country’s players. The Davis Cup has a brand and it’s not about the team, it’s about the country.” He explained.
“If Davis Cup goes to a neutral ground, then there is a big competition (with the ATP Cup).
“My suggestion would be that the semi-finals and finals have to be played home and away. Whereas the first two rounds can be played during a week on a natural ground.”

The removal of the home and away element to the Davis Cup finals may have a negative effect on the younger audience, instead of their goal of trying to make it appeal more to that target market. A somewhat ironic outcome. Wilander warns that under the new situation, less children might be inspired to participate in tennis.

“Would what be the effect if, lets say, Belgium plays away on a neutral ground? What will be the effect and inspiration for the kids in Belgium. Are they even going to watch it? Because they don’t watch Wimbledon, they don’t watch the US Open, they don’t watch David Goffin lose in the quarter-finals or semi-finals of the French Open. But they will watch Belgium play at home in Belgium, maybe even away in somewhere like France. That will inspire them.”

Woodforde’s call for calm

Embed from Getty Images

Throughout the entire situation, Tennis Australia has been one of the most vocal opponents. Earlier this week, team captain Lleyton Hewitt slammed Kosmos founder Gerard Pique. Telling reporters that it was ‘mind boggling’ that the competition was being run by somebody who had little knowledge about tennis. Hewitt was among a group of individuals from Tennis Australia that signed a letter last year condemning the changes.

Not all people from Australia are against the change. Mark Woodforde argues that action had to be taken before it was too late. The 53-year-old is regarded as one of his country’s greatest ever doubles players, winning 12 grand slam titles in men’s doubles and a further six in the mixed. Alongside Todd Woodbridge, the pair won more doubles matches (14) in the Davis Cup than any other Australian duo.

“I didn’t want to see the Davis Cup competition disappear and that was my biggest fear.” Said Woodforde. “If there wasn’t any changes to make it a significant event again, we wouldn’t have a Davis Cup competition at all.”

Elaborating further, Woodforde argues that there will be a more ‘exciting’ element brought to the Davis Cup. Something others dispute.

“I believe it is the same Davis Cup book, but a different chapter. I think it’s going to be exciting. It’s innovative.” He said.
“I think there has been more negative comments about the format and the competition hasn’t even started. Those pessimist out there, I like to think that a lot of good things are going to be happening top the competition.” He added.

The opinions of Enqvist, Wilander and Woodforde are ones that reflects the current situation in men’s tennis. All are passionate about the sport, but trying to find a common ground seems to be a tough task. If the legends of the sport can’t reach an agreement, what hope does the rest have?

The future of men’s team competition is complexed and unclear. The only certainty is that disagreements and arguments between the key figures in the sport will continue for the foreseeable future. Whether we like it or not.

 

Continue Reading

Interviews

EXCLUSIVE: Thomas Enqvist On The Fight To Revive Swedish Tennis

The world No.4 tells Ubitennis why he is hopeful that Sweden can once again become a powerhouse in the world of tennis.

Published

on

This year’s Australian Open marked the 20th anniversary of Thomas Enqvist’s finest moment in a grand slam as a player.

The Swede, who was 25 at the time, entered the 1999 draw at Melbourne Park as an unseeded player. He had never progressed beyond the quarter-finals of a grand slam before, but stunned everyone with consecutive wins over Patrick Rafter and Mark Philippoussis. The run saw him reach the final of the tournament where he had a 6-4 lead against Russia’s Yevgeny Kafelnikov, before losing in four sets. That was to be Enqvist’s first and only taste of what it is like to play in a major final.

“Result wise, this was the best one. It was a good memory.” The 44-year-old said during an interview with Ubitennis. “Of course it is always hard to look back to a final that you lost, but it is still a good memory.”

Enqvist played during a time where Swedish men enjoyed extensive success in tennis. At the time of his run to the Australian Open final, the country had eight players ranked in the top 80. Besides Enqvist, there were Thomas Johansson, Jonas Bjorkman and Magnus Norman all making their inroads on the tour. Sweden were also the reigning Davis Cup champions. Unknown to them at the time, that would be the last time the country would win the team tournament.

It is without a doubt that the country has a rich tennis tradition. In the past Sweden has also produced tennis stars such as Mats Wilander, Stefan Edberg, Jonas Bjorkman and Robin Soderling, who was the last player to win a ATP singles trophy back in 2011. So where did it all go wrong for the Swede’s?

“I think we still have a very strong tennis tradition in Sweden. We have a lot of people involved in Swedish tennis that have good knowledge and their heart in the right place.” Enqvist explained.
“We definitely need a player that can break through and can generate a little bit of hype because it’s all about getting the sports channel in Sweden to show tennis again.”

At present there are just four players from the Nordic country that has an official ATP ranking. Their star players are brothers Elias (22) and Mikael (20) Ymer. Both are yet to break into the world’s top 100. Elias came the closest at 105th last June. Further down the field, there is Markus Eriksson at 523rd and Linus Frost at 658th.

Embed from Getty Images

Due to the lack of top players, trying to maintain mass interest in the sport has become a problem in recent years. As pointed out by Enqvist, who noted the lack of mainstream Swedish media covering the Australian Open this year.

“I think it is a shame that we cannot have more media here (in Melbourne), even if we don’t have any players.” He said.
“If we can’t create enough interest at home how can we get kids interested in tennis? I think everybody has a little bit of responsibility, but it is not an easy situation.” He added.

Despite a seemingly dismal situation, hope lies with the next generation of players. There are currently two Swedish boys ranked in the top 100 on the junior circuit. Meanwhile, others are also gradually coming through.

“We have a bunch of players, who are 15 now. It’s one of the first generations that we have more than one or two.” Enqvist explained.
“This is actually a group of five or six that are international competitors. Hopefully one or two of these perform.”

Whist Enqvist is hopeful, for the foreseeable future, it looks like the lull in Swedish tennis will continue. A somewhat sad situation for a country that once dominated the sport.

Continue Reading

Interviews

EXCLUSIVE: Lindsay Davenport Gives Her Verdict On The Future Of American Tennis

The multiple grand slam champion spoke to Ubitennis earlier this week at the Australian Open.

Published

on

A group of young American players are ready to dominate the highest level of the women’s tour, according to former world No.1 Lindsay Davenport.

At this year’s Australian Open five women from America progressed to the fourth round of the tournament. A milestone that was last achieved at the tournament back in 2003. With the exception of Serena Williams, all of those players are aged under 25. In the current top 100, 12 American women feature. The youngest being 17-year-old Amanda Anisimova at 87th and the oldest being 38-year-old Venus Williams at 36th.

“I am not surprised. It’s been a long time coming. We had so much success in the 80s and 90s, and then a little bit of a lull.” Davenport told Ubitennis about the rise of her teenage compatriots.

List of American women in the top 100

Rank Player age
5 Sloane Stephens 25
16 Serena Williams 37
17 Madison Keys 23
35 Danielle Collins 25
36 Venus Williams 38
37 Sofia Kenin 20
56 Alison Riske 28
68 Bernarda Pera 24
87 Amanda Anisimova 17
88 Madison Brengle 28
93 Taylor Townsend 22
100 Coco Vandeweghe 27

One player that had made a name for herself in Melbourne is Danielle Collins. A two-time NCAA champion that had never won a grand slam main draw match prior to this year. Collins, who is playing in just her third season as a professional, stunned three seeds on route to a semi-final meeting with Petra Kvitova on Thursday. Her victims included Julia Goerges, Caroline Garcia and two-time grand slam champion Angelique Kerber.

“She’s had a tough draw. She earned her way here. She works so hard, so it is all about her success.” Davenport said in praise of Collins. “Sometimes with this generation, they want to play and they don’t, but this means the world to her.”

Davenport retired from tennis in 2010 after accumulating $22,166,338 in career prize money. The 13th highest sum of all time on the WTA Tour (as of 14/1/2019). She is a three-time grand slam champion in both singles and doubles. Winning a total of 93 WTA titles with 55 of those occurring in singles competition.

Looking ahead to the future, Davenport is confident that the rising stars from her home country can make a big impact on the WTA Tour. Believing that Collins’ run to the Australian Open semi-finals could trigger a snowball effect among her Fed Cup team mates.

“We have a great group of players from about 15-23 coming up and once a few of them start doing well, like Danielle (Collins), I think there is going to be a lot of success coming.” She concluded.

In the Open Era, 86 grand slam titles have been won by an American woman. The second highest by a country is Germany with 25.

The full interview can be listened to below :-

Note: Interview conducted by Ubaldo Scanagatta 

Continue Reading

Trending