Australian Open: The Top 10 Most Memorable Men’s Singles Matches
From Rod Laver to Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Stan Wawrinka. Here are the 10 matches played at the Australian Open in the men’s singles draw that will never be forgotten. VIDEO inside.
Original piece by Francesco Rio, for Ubitennis.com
1960 – Rod Laver b. Neale Fraser 5-7, 3-6, 6-3, 8-6, 8-6
Back in 1960 the Australian Open were still called Australian Championships. All players participating were from Australian nationality – all but South African Trevor Fancutt – and to take the spotlight was 22-year old Rod Laver. The win at the Australian Open remains the first greatest win for one of the all-time greatest. The grass in Australia perfectly suited Rod’s attacking game and supreme power at the net. Seeded at No.3, Laver first beat 2nd seed Roy Emerson in the semis, then won against expert Fraser in the final. Fraser won the first two sets quite comfortably, until Laver managed to break his opponent’s serve for the first time in the third set. From that moment on the match turned around and Rod entered tennis history.
1965 – Roy Emerson b. Fred Stolle 7-9, 2-6, 6-4, 7-5, 6-1
Five years after Rod Laver, Roy Emerson put together another stunning comeback in the finals of the Australian Open. Seeded No.1, Emerson had beaten John Newcombe in the semifinals in three sets. In the last act of the tournament he managed to come back from 2 sets down, winning against No.2 seed Fred Stolle. It was Roy’s 4th title at the Australian Open, surely the most intense and emotional triumph.
1988 – Mats Wilander b. Pat Cash 6-3, 6-7, 3-6, 6-1, 8-6
After losing 12 months before in the final to Stefan Edberg in Australia, Pat Cash was determined to take the title home the following year. Another Swede though, broke Pat’s dream. Mats Wilander had already won the AO title in 1983 and 1984 and surely knew how to conquer the Australian heat. The two battled for 4 hours and 28 minutes, the longest ever before Djokovic and Nadal in 2012. It was Mats’s 5th Grand Slam title, the first conquered on hard courts. For Cash, champion in 1987 at Wimbledon, that became the second defeat in a major final.
1991 – Boris Becker b. Omar Camporese 7-6, 7-6, 0-6, 4-6, 14-12
Back in 1991 Boris Becker arrived in Australia having already won 4 Grand Slam titles and finishing runner-up the year before at Wimbledon. Boris faced 22-year-old from Bologna, Italy, Omar Camporese in an incredible third round match. After 5 hours and 11 minutes, Boris managed to win the match. The German would then end up winning the title beating Ivan Lendl in the final. The match remains one of Italy’s all-time highest moments at the Australian Open.
1995 – Andre Agassi b. Pete Sampras 4-6, 6-1, 7-6, 6-4
The final in 1995 put one against the other the two best players of the World at the time. No.1 Pete Sampras vs. No.2 Andre Agassi. Pete had to fight hard to reach the last act in Melbourne. Agassi had to come back from two sets down in the 4th round against Magnus Larsson and then again in the quarter-finals against compatriot Jim Courier. Agassi had a much easier path to the final, without dropping a set. After losing the first set, Agassi just played one of the best matches of his career, becoming unbeatable on court that day.
2003 – Andy Roddick b. Younes El Aynaoui 4-6, 7-6, 4-6, 6-4, 21-19
Quarters-final match between 9th seed Roddick and 18th seed El Aynaoui. What was supposed to be an easy match for the American turned out to be a 4 hours and 59 minutes battle, an 83-game match. The quality of the match was stellar.
2005 – Marat Safin b. Roger Federer 5-7, 6-4, 5-7, 7-6, 9-7
After conquering 3 Slams in 2004, Roger Federer was already being pointed out to be the next great thing ever seen in tennis. At the Australian Open in 2005 the Swiss was the obvious favourite and defending champion. Safin had lost in the final to Federer in Melbourne the year before in his comeback tournament, after falling down in the rankings. The 2000 US Open champion played a superb match, impeccable on his backhand, to take the win and conquer his second Grand Slam title two days after, beatin Lleyton Hewitt in the final. Probably one of Safin’s all-time best performances.
2009 – Rafael Nadal b. Roger Federer 7-5, 3-6, 7-6, 3-6, 6-2
After playing what was defined as the best match in tennis history in 2008 in the finals at Wimbledon, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal met again in a Grand Slam final, this time in Melbourne. Beating the Swiss after a tough start, Nadal won his first and so far only title at the Australian Open, to then complete the career Grand Slam one year after winning the US Open. The match went down to history also for Federer’s tearful speech after losing the final and seeing Rod Laver hand the trophy to his historic rival.
2012 – Novak Djokovic b. Rafael Nadal 5-7, 6-4, 6-2, 6-7, 7-5
The longest final in the history of the tournament. Almost six hours of impeccable baseline battle. The Serb came to the final after finishing an incredible 2011 season with 3 Grand Slam titles, and having wont the title in Australia twice already in 2008 and 2011. In the longest match in the two’s rivalry, Djokovic came out on top. At the end of the marathon match, the two could hardly stand still during the trophy presentation.
2014 – Stan Wawrinka b. Novak Djokovic 2-6, 6-4, 6-2, 3-6, 9-7
One of the most memorable quarter-finals ever witnessed at the Australian Open. That year Stan Wawrinka exited the shadow of fellow countryman Federer to move on and take the spotlight all for himself. In an incredible 4-hour marathon, Stan didn’t stop playing at his best on his one-handed backhand and ended up beating the Serb in five sets. The two best backhands on the tour facing one another. Few days after, Wawrinka celebrated his first ever Grand Slam singles title, beating Rafael Nadal to finish as champion of Melbourne Park. The name “Stanimal” was born.
Iga Swiatek’s Ultimate Reflection: From Rome Heartbreak To Breakthrough Triumph
Iga Swiatek ultimate reflection has taught us the physiological demands of being an athlete.
Iga Swiatek’s life has changed over the last few years and now the world number one reflects on the defeat that defined the success that followed over the last few years.
Picture the scene. It was the 15th of September, 2020. The world was continuing to go through a traumatic time with the COVID-19 Pandemic six months in and tennis had just restarted a few months earlier in America.
A young 19 year-old called Iga Swiatek had just burst onto the scene having dominated the ITF tour and also conquered Grand Slam juniors. The Pole had won Roland Garros doubles with Caty McNally and followed that up by winning Wimbledon in singles.
Swiatek’s transition to the main tour was taken to like a duck to water as she reached her first final in Lugano in 2019 in April. That was followed by a decent showing at Roland Garros, reaching the last 16 before being demolished by former champion Simona Halep.
However at a young age, Swiatek had showed she can compete with the very best and more success was predicted for the Pole in the future.
Although nobody would predict was about to follow over the next few years with Swiatek eventually winning two Roland Garros titles and becoming one of the most dominant world number one’s in recent history.
Before we get to tennis domination, Swiatek had to go through what every athlete has to go to and that’s defeat.
It was in the Italian capital right before Swiatek’s first Grand Slam title in 2020 that the Pole suffered a massive setback as she would lose the most significant match in her career.
On the 15th of September 2020, Iga Swiatek went out in the first round to Arantxa Rus 7-6(5) 6-3.
A shocking defeat for Swiatek, who had high expectations for Rome and was looking to build some last minute momentum before her favourite Grand Slam of the year.
It was a career defining defeat for Swiatek though as she would win Roland Garros a few weeks later, claiming her first of three Grand Slam singles titles so far.
Three years later, Swiatek returned to Rome as the world number one and as defending champion ahead of her second Roland Garros title defence coming up in Paris.
In the Italian capital, Swiatek gave the ultimate reflection of that defeat to Rus that changed her career:
“Well, it wasn’t easy honestly. It was pretty tricky part of my career. I mean, I just started, but career,” Swiatek reflected on after her 6-0 6-0 demolition of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova.
“Well, this match, I remember it like a pretty traumatic one. She played, like, high balls. It really worked here on this slow surface. I couldn’t manage that properly. I was making a lot of mistakes. I didn’t feel really well.
“Then I remember we had some serious talks with the team on what to change and how to, like, reset, what I should do to feel a little bit better. I came home to practice, and that period of time wasn’t, like, easy at all. I also probably had some expectations because it was clay and I knew that I can do better. Yeah, it was really, really hard.
“Even when I came on Roland Garros, I remember just being on the Jean Bouin before the tournament, practicing there. I literally had the talk with Daria if it makes sense to continue everything because I felt so bad. I felt like, I don’t know, my expectations were just pretty high. I felt really bad on court. Always tense and stressed, even when I was practicing.
“I was able to kind of just really, really reset and let it go. I remember I was practicing I think with Kiki Mladenovic. We made a bet, me and Daria, if I’m finally going to have one practice that is going to be without any drama. I don’t remember what’s bet was for, but I remember it was about not having drama on practice, just playing one practice that is going to be calmer than most of my practices, but this is the goal.
“Since then, I managed on this tournament to kind of let everything go. Honestly, when I played my first rounds in Roland Garros 2020, I thought I played so bad that I can’t go lower, so I’m just going to play and see how it goes. Then I won couple of matches. I was like, Okay, what’s going on? Why am I suddenly winning?
“I managed to keep that till the end of the tournament. That’s why my win last year on Roland Garros felt much more special, because I felt like I’m in the right place. In 2020 it all felt like it’s like a big coincidence that I’m even here in the final of Roland Garros, for example. It was a tough time for me.
“Looking overall, I wouldn’t say that my 2020 season was good. I would say I only played well on Roland Garros. I don’t even know why, so… I’m pretty happy that I, like, worked through that experience and actually understood that lowering expectations, just letting everything go, was honestly the key. I tried to repeat that throughout all these years.”
Swiatek’s answer to a question about a defeat that defined her career shows her maturity and world-class talent on and off the court.
A teenager to identify her vulnerabilities and weaknesses is not easy let alone bringing people in to work on solutions.
Swiatek’s Roland Garros victory in 2020 was the start of a few years of success but almost ended in dramatic fashion having gone through stress throughout the tournament.
However it was a blessing in disguise as the Pole was able to identify long-term solutions for problems that relate to stress for the future as well as creating an environment that proves that she can still win the big tournaments.
Now Swiatek is stronger mentally than she ever has been, who knows if she’ll win a fourth Grand Slam title in Paris this year but the formula has been set for future success.
Swiatek’s ultimate reflection has taught us that the Pole is well on course to dominate the sport and create a legacy for many other young athletes on how to diagnose psychological problems.
The sorrows of the young Sinner
How strong is Jannik Sinner really? How the renaissance of Italian tennis deflated in Rome…
By Ubaldo Scanagatta
What could have been a memorable fortnight in Rome, despite some questionable scheduling and court quality, was hampered not only by the dire weather but also by the Italian players, who didn’t live up to the expectations. For the first time since 2019 no Italian, man or woman, featured in the quarterfinals.
Jannik Sinner had reached the quarter finals one year ago, where he was defeated by Tsitsipas (76 62). In 2021 Lorenzo Sonego had an outstanding run to the semifinals, putting away Thiem and Rublev, and was only halted by Djokovic. Matteo Berrettini made it to the quarterfinals in 2020, where he lost to Ruud.
Have we been overly trumpeting a Renaissance of Italian tennis in these years?
If we delve into the matter, we cannot really blame Matteo Berrettini for missing Internazionali BNL d’Italia two times in a row because of an endless string of injuries, neither can we criticize Lorenzo Sonego and Lorenzo Musetti for losing in straight sets against Stefanos Tsitsipas, No. 5 in the world and one of the best clay specialists, a two-time winner in Montecarlo, finalist in Roland Garros 2021 and Rome 2022. And Marco Cecchinato, while brushing away Bautista Agut, flashed glimmers of his heyday, namely 2018-19 when he reached the semifinals in Paris and a peak ranking at No.16.
Sonego even had two setpoints in the second set, which he didn’t play so brilliantly. Musetti had snatched a break in the second set but let the Greek back in before fatally dropping serve in the 12th game, just like in the first set. When the points get tight, the gap between the top players and the others suddenly widens.
There is no doubt that the great disappointment came when Jannik Sinner unexpectedly lost to Francisco Cerundolo. Throughout his young career the Argentinian had already beaten three top ten players (Ruud, Rublev and Auger-Aliassime) and is a tough hurdle to clear on clay, but the way he disposed of Sinner in the last two sets with a double 62 was discomforting.
A great disappointment because expectations were immense, considering that in the three Masters 1000 he played this year he had reached one final (Miami) and two semifinals (Indian Wells and Montecarlo).
Djokovic and Alcaraz, were the first two favourites for the title. But Sinner was rated as a third pick. And once Alcaraz and Djokovic were most unexpectedly ousted from the tournament he appeared as a likely winner. Also because Tsitispas hadn’t got off to brilliant start of clay season; Ruud had been struggling even more and Medvedev had never won a match in this previous four participations in Rome.
So is Sinner really as strong as here in Italy we say he is? Only Einstein could answer: it’s all relative.
Of course he’s a strong player. And it’s likely he’s going to stay in the top 10 for a long time. Much longer than Panatta, Barazzutti and Fognini did. Probably also than Berrettini, who has already been in the top ten longer than the three I mentioned, though helped by favourable circumstances, like the frozen rankings due to Covid.
How strong is he? Well, it depends on who we compare him with. If we look at his birth certificate, we cannot but think of Carlitos Alcaraz and Holger Rune.
Well, perhaps we have a little exaggerated, spurred by patriotism and craving for a true Italian champion, who has been missing since Panatta. Because the results achieved by Alcaraz, a Major and 4 Masters 1000, as well as No. 1 of the ATP ranking are quite different. It’s true that Jannik has beaten him on 3 occasions out of 6, at Wimbledon, Umag and Miami, not to mention the epic match at the US Open when he lost in 5 sets after having a match point. But this simply means that Alcaraz suffers his game, his powerful hitting from the baseline. In this sense there’s not such a huge gap, but many other aspects have to be taken into account.
Which are Jannik’s limits, compared with the current No. 1 in the world? Alcaraz is a much more complete player in terms of touch and finesse, natural gameplay fluidity, explosiveness of shots, physical strength, athleticism and variety of recovery skills and, therefore, unpredictability, tactical ductility, from serve and volley which he sometimes executes persistently, as he did against Medvedev, never looking like a fish out of water at the net) to marathon runner resilience. He can mix up powerful serves and kick serves, continuously varying angles and spin. His dropshots are completely natural. Jannik’s tennis, instead, often gives the impression of being robotic, even though he has made great progress in the last year.
I have often said that Jannik Sinner resembles Ivan Lendl, because Ivan’s philosophy was centred on work, work, and work, but he definitely wasn’t endowed with the same natural talent as John McEnroe. Yet he won more than McEnroe and this must be the hope, the goal of Sinner and his team.
Rune is a much more natural talent than Jannik. And it’s not only his mentor who says this. He’s more complete, he serves better, he lands drop shots with greater ease, he can alternate powerful groundstrokes and changes of pace…like Big Cat Mecir. He plays a clever tennis, instinctive at times, but also well-reasoned.
He has already won a Masters 1000, and he’s ahead of Jannik. He’s got a big personality, though sometimes he comes up with unpleasant behaviour on court. He quite reminds me of McEnroe. People just would wait for Mac to meltdown. It will be the same with Rune. The way he put away Djokovic, in spite of the match interruption due to rain which probably cost him the second set, proves his mental qualities. He had displayed the same qualities when he beat Sinner in Montecarlo.
He has achieved goals which Jannik has just got close to. Jannik seems to be often hampered by injuries. He’s not a natural tennis player, he’s not a natural athlete. But his desire to succeed is so impressive that he will overcome these shortcomings.
Alcaraz lost to Marozsan, but before losing he tried everything. He snatched a 4-1 lead in the tiebreak of the second set, which he ended up losing 7-4, because he too is young and can suddenly have lapses. But he battled away and tried to change tactics, whereas Jannik seemed flat and just gave in, without finding the strength to react and fight back.
Sinner is young too, and sooner or later he’s going to get through these situations. But he has to find his way. Many are the features of his game he has to work on: his serve, his volleys. His ultimate breakthrough is still to come.
Translated by Kingsley Elliot Kaye
The Madrid Open Men’s Final Was Three Sets Of Sheer Excitement
Winning is the ultimate key for Carlos Alcaraz or any tennis player.
Three sets in a non-major match just make winning more exciting for everyone other than the loser, even though Jan-Lennard Struff can take solace this time. After all, he was just a lowly “Lucky Loser.”
Struff actually took Alcaraz out of his game all the way until the Spanish 20-year-old finally came up with back-to-back love service games to secure a long 6-4, 3-6, 6-3 victory on Sunday in Madrid.
BREATHING EASILY DIDN’T COME EARLY FOR ALCARAZ
It was only then that Alcaraz could breathe easily against Struff’s amazing power and ability to win key points at the net.
Struff actually out-Alcarazed his foe until the end appeared to be in sight. The big German seemed to have an answer for everything Alcaraz could come up with until those last two service holds by the newest adult member of tennis greatness.
Alcaraz simply showed the packed house his true greatness and will to win. The young man was the true gem in the Madrid ATP Masters 1000 event.
ALL THE WAY WITH A BROAD SMILE
Alcaraz appeared to do it all with a broad smile on his young face. Three sets just made it more exciting for everyone other than the loser.
Alcaraz seems to enjoy the extra practice time when he needs it. And he needed it to turn back a 33-year-old opponent who played his heart out until the end.
He was outhit and outplayed, but when it came time to end things, Alcaraz was ready for the challenge.
ALCARAZ DID WHAT HE DOES BEST
Struff didn’t do anything really wrong. Alcaraz just did what he does best. Win.
The usual one-sided wins by Alcaraz, of course, are supreme fun for his growing number of fans. But at times like Sunday, Alcaraz appears to need to keep the pressure on until the clutch time comes. Otherwise, the fans might start celebrating too early.
After all, they already are in Rafa Heaven. What are the fans supposed to do if their two greats, Alcaraz and Rafa Nadal, have a showdown in Paris?
James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com.
Rafael Nadal Undergoes Surgery, Alcaraz Prepares For Musetti ‘Challenge’ At Roland Garros
Roland Garros Daily Preview: Teen Sensations Meet in the Third Round
Novak Djokovic Survives Resilient Davidovich Fokina To Reach Roland Garros Second Week
Aryna Sabalenka Rejects ‘Open’ Press Conference Request Citing Mental Health
Daria Kasatkina Discusses Off-Court Projects After Reaching Roland Garros Second Week
France’s Hugo Gaston Hit With Huge Fine For Unsportsmanlike Conduct
Novak Djokovic Denies Being Roland Garros Favourite, Praises Alcaraz
(EXCLUSIVE) Ukrainian Journalist Reacts To Controversial Booing Of Marta Kostyuk At French Open
Holger Rune Says Djokovic Still The Man To Beat At French Open
Woodbridge Hails Rising Star Holger Rune But Urges Him To Improve His On-Court Approach
(VIDEO EXCLUSIVE) Australian Open: Steve Flink Talks Djokovic’s Fitness, Nearest Rivals And Future Of American Tennis
EXCLUSIVE: Felix Auger-Aliassime’s Coach Fredric Fontang – ‘Felix Can Win Wimbledon This Year’
(VIDEO EXCLUSIVE) Australian Open: Steve Flink On Sabalenka’s Rise, Swiatek’s Tough Year Ahead
EXCLUSIVE: Meet Shane Liyanage – The Data Analyst Behind Aryna Sabalenka’s Breakthrough
(VIDEO) Ubaldo Scanagatta On A Week To Remember For Canada At The Davis Cup
Hot Topics2 days ago
Jannik Sinner On French Open Defeat – ‘My Inner Smile Wasn’t There’
Focus2 days ago
Daniel Altmaier Stuns Jannik Sinner In Roland Garros Marathon
Focus23 hours ago
Aryna Sabalenka Rejects ‘Open’ Press Conference Request Citing Mental Health
Hot Topics2 days ago
Novak Djokovic Stands By Kosovo Message At French Open Despite Criticism
Focus1 day ago
Daria Kasatkina Discusses Off-Court Projects After Reaching Roland Garros Second Week
Hot Topics3 days ago
(EXCLUSIVE) The Journalist Who Spoke To The Woman Allegedly Abused By A French Open Player
Latest news2 days ago
Gael Monfils Withdraws From French Open Clash With Rune
Latest news3 days ago
Dissatisfied Aryna Sabalenka Reaches French Open Third Round