TENNIS ATP MONTECARLO R. FEDERER/R. Stepanek 6‑1, 6‑2. An interview with:ROGER FEDERER
THE MODERATOR: Questions in English, please.
Q. 52 minutes. Pretty good first match for you.
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah. A bit surprised how well it went. Then again, it’s hard to serve through the opponent. I was able to get a lot of returns back into play. On clay, when you have the upper hand from the baseline, it’s kind of hard to get out of it.
I think that’s kind of how it was for Radek today. I had a good start to both sets, then I was solid on my own service games. The next thing you know, you’re in the lead and you can hit freely.
It was clearly a good match to start my claycourt campaign.
Q. I do not know if it’s true or not, but apparently your tennis scheduling depends on some possible birth in the next month. Is that true? You may go to Rome or Paris depending on that, or it has nothing to do with that?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, we got to see what’s going to happen. I mean, there’s no date there that is going to be for sure or not. So we’re just waiting.
Q. Will it change?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, of course. It’s a priority for me trying to be there, trying to support my wife. Of course, I’ve played enough tennis matches. Missing a tournament or missing a match wouldn’t change anything for me.
As we don’t know when it’s going to be yet, I’m happy playing at the moment.
Q. Would that include a Grand Slam if it happened then? You’d pull out?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, let’s talk about it when it would happen. At the moment we hope it’s not going to be that way. If it is, that’s what it is, you know.
Q. Can you talk about your next Czech opponent, Rosol.
ROGER FEDERER: Rosol, surprising the way he came through. But then again we know he can play good tennis. He’s dangerous. He takes big cuts at the ball. On clay, on a slower surface, sometimes you get more chances to hit the ball big.
I think playing Stepanek, who also plays flat and tries to play aggressive, puts him in at least the same, you know, frame of mind for playing against Rosol now next.
I didn’t see his matches here, unfortunately. I think at this point, early in the clay court season, I just have to focus on my own game, make sure I play solid and tough, use the sliding to the advantage that I can. Otherwise, you know, kind of remind yourself that it is, after all, a tennis match, and you have to try to come forward to close at the net and not wait for mistakes by the opponent.
You can do that sometimes on the clay, but I’m still figuring that out as we start the claycourt season.
Q. One question that is even more difficult to answer. In six months you have to play Davis Cup against Italy. Can you elaborate a bit what that means that you’re back in the Davis Cup, if there is any expectation bigger in Switzerland because of that?
ROGER FEDERER: You say what?
Q. If you play Italy, what that means for you.
ROGER FEDERER: Clearly we’re excited that Italy won so we get a chance to play at home. It’s big for the fans and the Federation, clearly, being able to make more money. They pay a lot of money over the years for trips. Like now they’re playing Fed Cup in Brazil. It’s good for them.
Especially back‑to‑back ties in Switzerland, it clearly is going to have a bit more euphoria around the tie and the competition.
We’re happy we were able to win against Kazakhstan. It was a big relief at the end. Clearly playing at home, being able to choose the place and the surface, I think favors us even more against Italy now. But we’re aware that every tie has to be played.
At this point, like I said after the Sunday in Geneva against Kazakhstan, I hope we’re both going to be healthy and give ourselves the best chance to win.
It’s always an interesting tie. I’ve played Italy twice before in my career, in Neuchetal and in Genoa. It’s always been good ties, friendly ties.
I think this one is going to be more special because there’s going to be much more on the line this time around.
Q. Place and surface, could be Basel on grass?
ROGER FEDERER: No (laughter). I tell you the answer, I don’t think it’s going to happen. But you never know.
I think it’s going to be more or less indoors. That’s my feeling. It’s just safer. If outdoors would have been an unbelievable advantage for us, then we would pick outdoors. Otherwise September in Switzerland is a bit of a gamble.
Most likely we’ll go back to indoors. It’s just a feeling I have.
THE MODERATOR: Questions in French.
Q. Why did you add this tournament to your schedule? How was it for the first match on clay?
ROGER FEDERER: Well, you are automatically entered into the Masters 1000s, but I waited because I didn’t want people to buy tickets counting on my presence if I was not going to come. I wanted to be honest with the spectators.
Also I know here it is easier to expect a wild card. I wanted to wait also after playing so much tennis to make sure I wouldn’t have any physical problems before I made the final decision.
I’m happy I’m here now. I arrived on Monday only, which is a bit late, but I needed time home after traveling so much. I wanted to stay away from the media.
This week I want to focus on tennis.
Q. So the transition to clay was not a problem?
ROGER FEDERER: I believe nowadays we no longer have this transition as we had before. Everybody knows how to play from the baseline. It’s more or less the same than on hard courts except for the sliding.
But many players are able to play well on clay now. We have more and more smaller countries, like Finland, Serbia, which play more on clay. Also European countries do well on clay. Before it was more the U.S. and Australia with grass and hard courts.
So it’s different now. The only little difference is the sliding and the bounces. You just have to learn how to use the sliding to your advantage. Otherwise the timing of the game is more or less the same.
Q. You are now at your best level physically again. Did you think you could play that well?
ROGER FEDERER: It’s a very good result today. I played solid. As soon as this season started, I was able to win against the best players. So after that period where I had a new racquet and a pain in my back, I’m very happy now that I’m doing well. But, of course, I also expect this from myself. So I’m just trying to keep up that rhythm.
I feel free physically and in my mind. I’m eager to play, I’m eager to practice. I want to play good points. I’m no longer afraid that the rally will last too long. This was getting in the way of my game last year, whereas now I can really enjoy myself.
“We Hope to Convince Federer to Play”: the Presentation of the 2022 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters
Director Zeljko Franulovic talked about next year’s tournament, scheduled from April 9-17
The 2022 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters will take place from April 9-17, so it’s difficult to guess what the pandemic situation will be in six months. At the moment, however, the prevalent hypothesis is that all spectators will need a Covid Pass or to bring proof of a negative test before being allowed in the Montecarlo Country Club at Roquebrune, France. If some players will refuse the vaccine, then they will need to be tested regularly in accordance to the rules devised by the French government.
Other than that, there will be no surprises when it comes to the event’s logistics, since the Country Club has already added a new players lounge and a new press room in the past few years. In 2020 the tournament was cancelled, while in 2021 it took place behind closed doors (while still being televised in 113 countries); the last edition staged with a crowd, in 2019, sold 130,000 tickets, constituting 30% of the total revenue – another 30% came from the sponsors, 30% from media rights (a number that tournament director Zeljko Franulovic hopes to see increase) and 10% from merchandising.
While it’s early days to know whether the tournament will operate at full capacity, Franulovic has made it clear that the organisers are already planning to provide a better covering for the No.2 Court, whose roof has not been at all effective in the past in the event of rain.
The tournament’s tickets can be bought on the official website of the event, but Franulovic has already vowed to reimburse immediately every ticket “if the government and the health authorities should decide to reduce the tournament’s capacity.”
Ticket prices have increased by 2 to 3 percent as compared to 2019, ranging from £25-50 for the qualifiers weekend, £32-75 for the opening rounds, £…-130 for the quarterfinals and semifinals, £65-150 for the final, £360-1250 for a nine-day tickets. Franulovic claims that the prices are in line with those of the other Masters 1000 tournaments.
Finally, Franulovic supports Andrea Gaudenzi’s decision to create a fixed prize money for the next decade. While tournaments like Madrid and Rome are trying to increase their duration from 8 to 12 days, the Monte-Carlo director has claimed that he prefers to remain a week-long event, especially because his is not a combined tournament. As for the players who will feature, Franulovic hopes to convince Roger Federer to participate: “I’m certain that he will give everything he has to be able to stage another comeback on the tour, ma no one knows where he’ll play. However, I think that on the clay he should opt for best-of-three events like Monte-Carlo and Rome rather than the French Open.”
For this and more information, you can watch the video above.
EXCLUSIVE: How The ATP Plans To Make The Tour More Welcoming For LGBT Players
The governing body of men’s tennis has received praise for taking a proactive approach to the topic with the help of a leading LGBTQ+ organisation and a top research university.
During the first week of the US Open, there was an abundance of rainbow-theme flags and wristbands worn by both players and fans to mark the tournament’s first-ever Open Pride Day.
The event was part of the USTA’s Diversity and Inclusion strategic platform which aims to make tennis more inclusive. Unlike the women’s game, there are no openly LGBTQ+ players on the men’s Tour and there have been few historically, even though various players have spoken of their support for anybody on the Tour who decides to come out. Including Stefanos Tsitsipas and newly crowned US Open champion Daniil Medvedev, who were questioned about the topic following their second round matches. Meanwhile, Canada’s Felix Auger-Aliassime revealed that there is an ongoing survey related to LGBTQ+ issues being conducted by the ATP.
“Recently I’ve started doing a survey inside the ATP about the LGBTQ+ community,” he said. “It’s important these days to be aware of that and to be open-minded and the ATP needs to do that, in today’s time it’s needed.
“The reason we don’t have openly gay players on the ATP Tour, I’m not sure of the reason, but I feel me, as a player, it would be very open, very welcome. Statistically, there should be some, but for now there’s not.”
In response to Auger-Aliassime’s comment, UbiTennis looked into the work currently being done by the ATP alongside two other parties. Their decision to venture into LGBTQ+ representation on the Tour is part of their recent commitment to support the mental health and wellbeing of their players and staff. Last year, in May, they formed partnerships with Headspace and Sporting Chance.
The survey currently being conducted by the ATP started after the governing body of men’s tennis reached out to Lou Englefield, the director of Pride Sports, a UK organisation that focuses on LGBTQ+phobia in sport and aims to improve access to sport for all LGBTQ+ people. Through their connection, they contacted Eric Denison, a behavioural science researcher at Monash University’s School of Social Sciences. Denison was the lead author of the Out on the Fields study, the first international study on homophobia in sport and the largest conducted to date.
“I have been personally impressed with the initiative of the ATP and their desire to find ways to mitigate the broad impact of homophobic behaviour (in particular), not only on gay people, but on all players.” He told UbiTennis during an email exchange.
“We know of no other sporting governing body in the world that has been proactive on LGBTQ+ issues, and has taken a strong focus on engaging with both the LGBTQ+ community and scientists to find solutions.”
Denison says the norm has been for sports bodies to address this issue after they have been either pressured to do so or if the LGBTQ+ community got the ball rolling themselves. Incredibly, research conducted as part of the Out On The Fields initiative documented 30 separate studies which found sports organisations ignored discrimination experienced by LGBTQ+ people in sport.
Monash University has supplied the ATP with a series of scientifically validated questions, which they are using to ‘look under the hood’ at the factors which supports a culture where gay or bisexual players feel they are not welcome. The methodology is similar to a study Denison conducted in 2020 that focused specifically on the team sports rugby union and ice hockey.
“We suspect that tennis isn’t inherently more homophobic than other sports, or traditionally male settings. Instead, there is a disconnect between people’s attitudes towards gay people (e.g. the recent pro-gay comments by top players) and their behaviour, specifically their use of homophobic banter and jokes,” said Denison.
“This behaviour, which is largely habitual, creates a hostile climate for young gay/bi people who drop out or hide their sexuality. This means gay/bi players are invisible in youth tennis and leads to the downstream problem of no professionals. The banter/jokes continue because people think it is harmless.”
The hope is that players will also agree to be interviewed by the researchers for them to get a better understanding. All of the results will then be used by Pride Sports and Monash University to recommend evidence-based solutions. It is unclear as to how long the study will take or when the findings will be ready.
Former top 100 player Brian Vahaly is one of the few players to have been both openly gay and played at the highest level of the men’s game. However, he didn’t fully come to terms with his sexuality until after retiring from the sport at age 27. Speaking to UbiTennis earlier this year, Vahaly shed light on the potential barriers for gay players.
“There were a lot of homophobic jokes made on Tour. It’s a very masculine and competitive environment,” he said. “You don’t see a lot of gay representation, except for the women’s Tour. With me not having the personality of an outspoken advocate (for LGBTQ+ issues), certainly not in my twenties, I needed some time to understand myself. To me, in tennis I didn’t feel like there was anybody to talk to or anybody that was going through anything similar.”
The ATP has spoken with Vahaly about their initiative and he has become ‘quite involved.’ Through their discussions, he got acquainted with Denison for the first time. As a professional, Vahaly peaked at a ranking high of 64th in the world and won five Challenger titles. After retiring from the Tour, he has served on the USTA’s board of directors since 2013.
“I am happy to hear that the ATP is finally taking action to address this issue. I’m impressed they are taking a thoughtful, data-driven approach to make a meaningful difference here,” he told UbiTennis.
The ATP aims to make the men’s Tour more welcoming to potential LGTBQ+ athletes playing either now or in the future. For those who question if such an initiative is important in 2021, you only have to look at the younger demographic.
Sportsnet quoted CDC data from 2019 which showed that 26% of American LGBTQ+ teenagers aged 16 or 17 has contemplated suicide, five times more than those who identify as straight (5%). Among those teenagers who heard homophobic terms, 33% self-harmed and an additional 40% considered doing so.
More than 2000 players around the world currently have an ATP ranking.
2020 Tokyo Olympics, Djokovic on the heat and the new scheduling: “I’m glad they listened to us”
Speaking to Ubitennis, the world number one describes the work that he, Medvedev and Zverev (among others) have done to obtain better playing conditions
So far, the tennis tournament at the 2020 Olympics has made headlines less for the match-play than for the difficult conditions in which it has been taking place due to the heat and the humidity. In the women’s draw, for instance, four players have been forced to retire during their matches: the last one has been particularly shocking, as Paula Badosa was taken off-court on a wheelchair after collapsing late in the first set of her quarter-final match against Marketa Vondrousova. Luckily, these issues appear to have finally caught the attention of the International Tennis Federation: starting tomorrow, no match will be played before 3pm (7am in the UK).
Part of the credit for this (still belated) decision goes to the lobbying and the complaints of the players, as world N.1 Novak Djokovic explained while speaking to Ubitennis CEO Ubaldo Scanagatta in Tokyo: “I’m glad the decision was made to reschedule tomorrow’s opening matches at 3pm. Today we went to speak to the supervisor – when I say ‘we’ I mean myself, Medvedev, and Zverev, along with the team captains. I have spoken to Khachanov and Carreno Busta as well, so the majority of the players who will feature in the quarter finals was of the same opinion.
“Of course I would have wished for this decision to be made a few days ago, but it’s still a good thing,” he added. “Nobody wants to witness incidents like the one that occurred to Badosa.
“The conditions are really brutal. Some people might think that we are just complaining, but all resistance sports (and tennis should be included among them) are taking place later in the day because the combination between the heat and the humidity is really terrible.”
He then concluded: “I’ve been a professional tennis player for almost 20 years and I’ve never experienced such hard conditions for so many consecutive days. It may have have happened once or twice in Miami or New York, but just for one day, whereas in Tokyo the situation is like this every day. I think that this decision will benefit the fans as well, because playing later allows us to play our best – these conditions were just draining for us.”
Article by Lorenzo Colle; translated by Tommaso Villa
Simona Halep On Raducanu, Romania and The COVID-19 Vaccine
Gael Monfils Omitted From French Davis Cup Squad But May Still Play
Andrey Rublev defends his title in St. Petersburg
Qualifier Anastasia Gasanova shocks Teichmann in Cluj-Napoca
Elina Svitolina Splits With Coach After Five Years
REPORT: Unvaccinated Players Set To Be Banned From Playing Australian Open
Novak Djokovic Undecided Over Playing Australian Open, Slams Speculation Over His Vaccination Status
Roger Federer Says ‘Revolution’ Needed To Help Next Generation Of Tennis Players
The 2021 Indian Wells Women’s Draw In Full
‘I Don’t Want To Be Part Of The Silence’ – Sportscaster Mary Carillo On Why She Boycotted The Laver Cup
US Open, Steve Flink: “Djokovic’s loss had more to do with fatigue than pressure”
US Open, Steve Flink on the Murray-Tsitsipas Controversy
(VIDEO) Dominic Thiem, Juan Martin Del Potro Gathering Momentum In Comeback Bids
Steve Flink On Wimbledon: “Bautista Agut would be a tough semifinal test for Djokovic”
Wimbledon, Flink: “Djokovic Will Beat Zverev in the Final”
Latest news2 days ago
Simona Halep, Emma Raducanu Heads The Field in Cluj Napoca
Focus2 days ago
Bad news for the Transylvania Open as no fans are allowed
Interviews2 days ago
“We Hope to Convince Federer to Play”: the Presentation of the 2022 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters
Hot Topics1 day ago
Alexander Zverev Makes Fresh Swipe At Davis Cup Finals
Latest news2 days ago
Transylvania Open Suffers Major Blow As Seven Players Pull Out
Latest news3 days ago
Jannik Sinner beats Arthur Rinderknech in Antwerp to reach his sixth semifinals in Antwerp
Latest news3 days ago
Aslan Karatsev reaches his fourth ATP Tour semifinal this season in Moscow
Hot Topics1 day ago
Emma Raducanu looking to finish the season on a high note