The feeling is that each time it would be a bit harder, a bit more complicated because he needs to dig his way out of a hole that gets a few inches deeper every time. A hole dug by the passing of time, not quite exactly the kindest opponent.
Of course, we are talking about a man who holds his own against time pretty well. Less than a year ago, Roger Federer played that famous 8-7, 40-15 match you probably may have heard a thing or two about (even if the plot turned in favour of his Serbian opponent, at the end).
Three years ago, after a five months break from the tour, he wore the Superman mantle to win a Grand Slam title in Australia, despite his 17th seed, overcoming both his rivals and superstition.
That’s why we definitely cannot dismiss his aim to come back on the court in his 40s, but we must take some facts into considerations nonetheless. The recently announced second arthroscopic procedure on his right knee in a four-month timespan is not good news. Even if this is not an invasive procedure, even if it’s not uncommon for athletes to have multiple surgeries of this kind in a few months, and even if it could allow doctors to carefully inspect the conditions of his joint, it is definitely a sign that the first surgery did not solve the issue that was troubling Federer.
Arthroscopy is used to treat a broad spectrum of conditions, from meniscus, ligaments and patella injuries to mobile bone fragments removal, and, with no precise indications about the specific issue Federer is dealing with, it’s very difficult to speculate.
What we do know, however, is that the Swiss player is willing to come back on the tour in 2021, the year he’ll turn 40. Very few players, especially in the Open Era, were still playing at that age: Radek Stepanek, Tommy Haas, El Aynaoui and Dick Norman all stopped at 39. A remarkable exception is Ivo Karlovic, the 1979-born Croatian who played in all four Grand Slam tournaments last year and eclipsed Jimmy Connors’ 1992 campaign – the American turned 40 in September that season and contested in all but one Grand Slam, the Australian Open, a tournament he only played twice in his career.
Besides Connors and Karlovic, just two other players had been ranked among the top 100 in the world while in their forties. The first one is little known Danish player Torben Ulrich, who first appeared in a Grand Slam draw in 1948: he never won a single tournament, but was still active in 1975, at almost 47, in both Grand Prix and WCT Tours. Ulrich was ranked 98th in the world at 46 years of age and won his last official match against Pancho Segura, in Lacosta, USA, in 1974.
The second one is Ken Rosewall. The Australian legend appeared for the final time in a Grand Slam competition on his home soil at 44 – losing in the third round – and reached two finals a few months before turning 40, at Wimbledon and at the U.S. Open – he lost both matches, badly, to Jimmy Connors.
Limiting the analysis to Wimbledon, however, it emerges that the oldest contestant in its glorious history was Major Josiah George Ritchie, at the staggering age of almost 56, in 1926. His short Wikipedia page reports a fun out-of-time note to clarify that “Major was his first name, not a military title.”
But let’s take a look at the Open Era book of records, because that is where things get interesting. By entering The 2021 Championships at 39 years and 11 months of age, Federer would set a remarkable benchmark in the history of the Open Era, but not an outright record. It would be enough to surpass Connors, but Rosewall (1978) and Karlovic (2019) would still retain a better record.
The very top spot on this special list is held by 44-year-old Pancho Gonzalez in 1972, the same guy who was still among the top seeded players in the 1969 edition of the Championships. At 41 years of age.
As a side note, two other players born in 1981 have publicly stated their intention to compete at SW19 next year: Feliciano Lopez, one month younger than the Swiss ace, and the Italian Paolo Lorenzi, who aims to rejoin the top 100 before retiring.
We may have missed some other names, but, if so, they are no more than a handful. Very few players competed in singles at ATP level tournaments in their forties and, among them, only Rosewall proved competitive for major titles. An astonishing feat he may soon have to share with Roger Federer, if the Swiss player follows up on his comeback plan next year.
A sensational coup we better start to believe in, because it’s Roger Federer we are talking about – he has accustomed us to that kind of achievements.
Translated by Filippo Ambrosi; edited by Tommaso Villa
Djokovic Isn’t Satisfied With The 20-20-20 Look
The world number one will be the overwhelming favourite at the US Open, but Berrettini is here to stay
Now that Novak Djokovic has 20-20-20 vision, he says he’s not through.
He’s aiming to be the sole leader of the gang now that he has deadlocked Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer at 20 Grand Slam singles titles each.
But future Grand Slam titles might not come easy for any of the 20-20-20 gang, even youngest member Djokovic. Italian muscleman Matteo showed on Sunday in his Wimbledon championship match loss to Djokovic that he has arrived as a legitimate Grand Slam tournament contender.
NOVAK BIDDING TO MATCH LAVER
Of course, Djokovic now has won three Grand Slams this year and has his eyes focused on winning all four Grand Slams in one year, matching something the great Rod Laver accomplished twice about half-a-century ago.
The U.S. Open awaits the challenge. Novak will be a huge favorite, although it would be great to see Rafa and Roger in New York again.
Who knows? These two legends hopefully are already out getting their games ready for the hard courts of Flushing Meadows.
MATTEO AGGRESSIVE, YET PASSIVE
Berrettini had his chances against Djokovic. But he was either too eager or too passive with his shots much of the afternoon. Unlike the 20-20-20 Gang, Matteo really doesn’t have great touch. But power? He has more than he needs.
Between the two traits, Berrettini didn’t take full advantage of his many opportunities. Had he cashed in on the majority of them, Wimbledon might have had a different champion, and Djokovic would still be looking up at Nadal and Federer.
But Novak was always there, ready to pounce on the smallest window of opportunity. He often turned opportunities for Berrettini into his own.
BERRETTINI: THE BIG MUSCULAR GUY
The preliminaries to the match were very English-like, much like the aftermath of the grueling 6-7 (4), 6-4, 6-4, 6-3 victory by Djokovic. Both players were somber as they made their way onto the court, each carrying green and white Head tennis bags and hand bags
Wearing his usual cap turned backward, the 25-year-old Berrettini looked like a movie star or a tight end with his 6-5, 209-pound figure, overshadowing the 6-2, 172-pound Djokovic, whose thin-man look enables the 34-year-old Serbian to be as nimble as an acrobat.
The first game lasted what seemed like a set as Djokovic survived two double faults and a break point to take a 1-0 lead. Novak broke in the fourth game and led 5-2 before Berrettini pulled his game together to survive the eight-deuce eighth game, then broke Novak and held service for 5-5.
TIEBREAKER BELONGS TO MATTEO
Berrettini surprisingly outplayed Djokovic in the tiebreaker and closed the door with an ace. But the Italian came down to earth and was broken early in each of the last three sets to allow Djokovic to take the title.
Grand Slam titles didn’t always come so often for Djokovic. After notching his first Grand Slam title at the 2008 Australian Open, he watched Rafa Nadal and Roger Federer win 10 of the 11 Grand Slams before Novak got in the winner’s circle again in 2011.
EVERYTHING GOING NOVAK’S WAY
But now as Nadal and Federer appear to be struggling with their age, Djokovic has won eight of the last 14 Grand Slams. Overall, he has won 20 of the last 54 Grand Slams.
While all of that has been happening, Djokovic has won five of the last seven Wimbledons, and six in all.
Everything appears to be going Novak’s way, but the young guns of the tour obviously are getting anxious to win Grand Slams. And Novak can’t look like Superman forever.
See James Beck’s Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier columns at postandcourier.com (search on James Beck column). James Beck can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com
Why Are So Many Tennis Players Skipping The Olympics?
It isn’t just the COVID-19 pandemic which are putting players playing off going.
On Monday Canada’s Dennis Shapovalov joined the growing number of tennis stars who have decided not to play in this year’s Olympics Games.
In a statement issued on social media, the world No.12 said his decision was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and doing what he believes was best for the safety of his team. Japan, which is where the Games are being held, has been dealing with a surge in cases in recent weeks with a low number of the population to be fully vaccinated. Whilst the country has banned international spectators from attending amid fears of the virus being spread, organisers say up to 10,000 domestic fans will be allowed to attend the Olympic venues.
“After careful consideration I wanted to let you know that I will not be participating in the Olympics this year. Representing Canada means the world to me, but due to the current situation my team and I have decided this is the best decision for everyone’s safety,” Shapovalov wrote on twitter.
Shapovalov’s concerns related to the pandemic aren’t the only thing which is deterring tennis players from attending the Olympics. Over the past week, two top 10 players from the men’s Tour also confirmed that they will not be participating. Rafael Nadal is missing the event in order to take a break from the sport following what was a demanding clay court swing. Meanwhile, Dominic Thiem says he doesn’t want to travel to Tokyo and instead wants to focus on his title defence at the US Open.
This year’s tennis calendar doesn’t favour the Olympics. The Wimbledon Championships concludes two weeks before it begins and the US Open starts five weeks after. Two of the biggest events in the sport which offer the highest amount of prize money and ranking points per round. At the same time as the Olympics two ATP 250 events are taking place in Austria and America.
“So much has to depend on where a player is in their career. Have they won an Olympic medal before? How important is it to them? Do they want to travel to Asia in the middle of the summer? For every player I think it is very individual how seriously they take the Olympics,” former Olympic champion Lindsey Davenport told The Tennis Channel in 2020.
Tennis was officially reintroduced into the Games back in 1988 after being showcased as a demonstration sport four years prior. It is different to Tour events with no official prize money on offer. However, some countries such as Russia have previously issued financial rewards for athletes who win medals.
Another sticking point is there being no ranking points available for players participating. Back in 2019 the International Tennis Federation told UbiTennis they were ‘open’ to allowing points being awarded but no progress has been made. Perhaps due to the complex governance of the sport with the Olympic event being run by the ITF. Meaning they will have to form an agreement with both the ATP and WTA for such an incentive to happen.
“Currently, the WTA and ATP do not award points for the Olympic Qualification Pathway. We (the ITF) are always open to discussion on the matter.” The ITF said.
Another issue concerns the location. Players face having to travel from Europe to Asia and then North America within a month. A journey made substantially more difficult than usual due to restrictions related to the pandemic.
Chile’s Christian Garin says his decision not to go to Tokyo is because he feels athletes will not be able to get the full experience due to the current restrictions in place.
“Due to the instability of this year and added to the fact that the established conditions will not allow me to live the real experience of what the Olympic Games mean, that is why I have made this decision,” he wrote on Instagram.
When it comes to other Olympic absentees, a contingent of Spanish players will not be attending due to what newspaper Marca describes as ‘calendar issues and a logistically difficult trip to Tokyo.’ Those skipping the event are Roberto Bautista Agut, Albert Ramos, Feliciano López, Jaume Munar and Carlos Alcaraz. Norway’s Caper Ruud, Serbia’s Dusan Lajovic and Bulgaria’s Grigor Dimitrov will also not be playing.
Despite the surge in withdrawals which will most likely increase in the coming weeks, other top names have committed to playing. Novak Djokovic, Naomi Osaka, Daniil Medvedev, Victoria Azarenka, Aryna Sabalenka and Andy Murray have all confirmed they will play.
“It’s going to be my first Olympic Games. We have a great team so we can do some doubles, mixed doubles, everything,” Medvedev said about playing.
“Going to be amazing experience. Of course, with COVID maybe it’s not going to be the same like every year.”
The Olympic tennis event will be held at the Ariake Coliseum and get underway on July 24th.
The Other Side of Press Conferences
American author and journalist Mike Mewshaw gives his take on the controversy that surfaced at this year’s French Open
After Naomi Osaka’s withdrawal from the French Open, the debate about press conferences keeps cropping up. Pressers have been analyzed from more angles than Rafa’s forehand or Serena’s backhand. Players, both active and retired, have weighed in with their opinions, along with coaches and sports therapists. The consensus is that tennis reporters are insensitive, disrespectful, sexist, racist, and eager to provoke controversy.
The constant threat of illness, the absence of fans, the isolation, and loss of income has certainly added to impatience with reporters. Venus Williams tartly suggested she maintained her composure during interviews by realizing she could beat any hack in the room; none of them could hold a candle to her.
But this sort of disrespect runs in both directions. While players view reporters as pesky publicity machines, at best, or gossip-hounds at worst, some journalists regard players as spoiled high school dropouts who couldn’t write a grammatically correct paragraph if their endorsement contracts depended on it. With all due deference to Naomi Osaka, I would urge her and her colleagues on the ATP and WTA tours to view things from a different perspective. The coronavirus has wreaked havoc on the press just as it has on them. Plenty of tennis reporters have lost their jobs. Almost all of them earn less income. They face the same risks of infection and submit to enough Covid tests to leave them as red-nosed as Rudolph.
Under the circumstances, reporters who travel the tour, along with those covering matches remotely from their basements, have done a creditable job. Sure, they sometimes sound testy, just as the players do. Of course their questions can be repetitious, just as the players answers can be.
Over the past four decades, I’ve covered more press conferences than I now have white hairs on my head. I’ve heard racist comments, sexist remarks and massively insulting accusations. But more often than not, the putdowns were aimed at reporters or at other players. In the old days, these seldom made it into newspapers, and the really offensive quotes and admissions of rule breaking were deleted from press conference transcripts. In that politically incorrect era, Arthur Ashe, for instance, came in for a raft of prejudice. Ilie Nastase openly referred to him as negroni.
Although it’s now largely forgotten, Billie Jean King’s sexuality was accepted by the press long before many on the women’s tour spoke up in her defense. While male journalists can be appallingly insensitive—Italian Hall of Fame journalist Gianni Clerici used to print Steffi Graf’s menstrual cycle in La Repubblica—it would be difficult to find anything less “woke” than Martina Hingis’ description of Amélie Mauresmo as a “half-man” who “travels with her girlfriend.” Or Lindsay Davenport’s comment after Mauresmo beat her, “I thought I was playing a guy.”
Predictably, both women walked back these quotes, accusing the press of taking their words out of context. That’s an ancient canard on the circuit—shoot off your mouth, then claim you were misquoted. I remember Buster Mottram, then the British Number One, complaining about rowdy fans in Rome, accusing Italians of being animals. At his next press conference he carefully parsed the remark. Suddenly the voice of reason, he observed that human beings were all, anthropologically speaking, animals.
If Buster had won a few majors, his quotes might have been immortalized, like Andre Agassi’s wisecrack at the French Open, “I’m happy as a faggot in a submarine.” That line made the list of Esquire Magazine’s annual Dubious Achievement Awards.
John McEnroe’s infamously objectionable conference quotes could only be contained on a wall as vast as the Vietnam War Memorial. Even if one had the space and energy to chisel them in stone, many would have to be bowdlerized. One that barely passes the censor’s blue pencil is his barbarous backhand at a female reporter who had the impertinence to question him. “Lady, you need to get laid.”
In some cases actions speak louder and more loathsome than words. After a match in Milan, a local female journalist asked Jimmy Connors, “Why do you always touch yourself in a particular place?” Jimmy shoved a hand down his shorts and gave his genitals a good shake. “It feels good. You should try it.”
To repeat, I empathize with Naomi Osaka’s aversion to press conferences. More than she might imagine I agree that they can be frustrating, stress producing, depressing, and borderline transgressive. I accept the sage advice of deep-think editorials and socially conscious scribes that reporters need to raise the level of their game. But so do players who could profit from sensitivity training, anger management, and basic etiquette lessons. With mutual respect for all those who share a rough road toward an uncertain future, the tour could become a better place for everybody.
Michael Mewshaw is the author of 22 books, among them AD IN AD OUT, a collection of his tennis articles, now available as an e-book.
Daniil Medvedev Fumes Over Heat, Cheater Question At Olympics
Svitolina Beats Giorgi to Reach Semis in Tokyo
Ugo Humbert Pulls Off Tsitsipas Upset In Tokyo
Tokyo Olympics Daily Preview: Djokovic, Barty, Nishikori Among Players Pulling Double Duty
Liam Broady Shares Delight At Career-Best Win In Tokyo
REPORT: Wimbledon Matches Under Investigation Over Suspicious Betting Patterns
Novak Djokovic A Bigger Favourite To Win Wimbledon Than Any Other Major, Says Zverev
Roger Federer Rules Out Retirement In ‘Immediate Future’ But No Guarantee Of Return To Wimbledon
Kristina Mladenovic Handed Hefty Fine Over ‘Off Court’ Incident At Wimbledon
Novak Djokovic Has ‘Best Momentum’ To Break All-Time Grand Slam Record, Says Nadal’s Ex-Coach
(VIDEO) Dominic Thiem, Juan Martin Del Potro Gathering Momentum In Comeback Bids
Steve Flink On Wimbledon: “Bautista Agut would be a tough semifinal test for Djokovic”
Wimbledon, Flink: “Djokovic Will Beat Zverev in the Final”
French Open, Steve Flink: “Nadal is the clear favourite, but Tsitsipas and Djokovic have a shot”
French Open, the women’s draw. Flink: “Osaka’s press conference boycott is a mistake”
Hot Topics1 day ago
Andy Murray Explains Decision Behind Withdrawing From Olympic Singles Event
Hot Topics2 days ago
Proud Novak Djokovic Puts Tennis Into The Spotlight At Olympics
Hot Topics24 hours ago
Village Life A Blessing For Stefanos Tsitsipas At Tokyo Olympics
ATP2 days ago
Stefanos Tsitsipas ‘Happy’ To Follow In Grandfather’s Footsteps At Olympics
Latest news2 days ago
Why Newly Married Elina Svitolina Has No Plans To Change Her Surname
Focus1 day ago
Marketa Vondrousova Shocks Naomi Osaka in Tokyo
Latest news2 days ago
Carlos Alcaraz becomes the youngest ever champion at ATP Tour level since Kei Nishikori in 2008
Focus1 day ago
Tokyo Olympics Daily Preview: Greece’s Top Players Face Significant Opposition on Tuesday