NEW YORK — Tennis is still all about who’s playing the game.
Parents watch their kids grow up through their junior tennis days. Then maybe college tennis.
But when it comes to watching big-time tennis such as at the U.S. Open, nothing tops star power. That was never more evident than Friday and Saturday in Arthur Ashe Stadium.
NEW YORK CROWD UNSURE ABOUT MEDVEDEV
Russia’s Daniil Medvedev is red hot this summer, first on the U.S. Open series where he lost in two finals before winning in Cincinnati. And then he made the U.S. Open final.
But the New York crowd doesn’t get very excited about the 6’6″ wonder. Empty seats were plentiful Friday afternoon when Medvedev knocked off Grigor Dimitrov in the first men’s semifinal. Even if the crowds weren’t excited about Medvedev, they should have been thrilled to see Dimitrov. Obviously, the fans weren’t too happy that Dimitrov had taken down Roger Federer in the quarterfinals.
But, suddenly, when Rafa Nadal took center court for the second semifinal, fans were everywhere. That was for a match against a relative newcomer to big-time tennis. Matteo Berrettini could play, but he was no equal for Nadal.
NADAL MAKES EMPTY SEATS DISAPPEAR
Yet, it was time to be sure you were in the correct seat. The empty seats had disappeared.
The U.S. Open had switched gears. It had gone from the frenzied atmosphere of young
Americans Coco Gaulf, Caty McNally and Taylor Townsend to a different reality.
The old-timers, better known as all-timers, might be nearing the end of the road in big-time tennis. Yes, the list includes even Serena Williams.
Nadal took care of his end of the bargain with the fans by turning away Berrettini in sraight sets to secure his day, and a spot in the final against Medvedev.
Serena couldn’t save her day in Saturday’s women’s final, despite the efforts of a packed stadium of wildly cheering supporters. Nineteen-year-old Canadian Bianca Andreescu simply was better on this day.
ANDREESCU MIGHT BE FOR REAL
Of course, Andreescu has plenty of time to set records and win fans. Serena rallied from 5-1 down in the second set, and appeared headed for another possible magical win when she tied the set at 5-5.
In the end, Serena failed again in her attempt to win a record-tying 24th Grand Slam title in a 6-3, 7-5 loss to Andreescu.
Serena might have made 2018 champion Naomi Osaka’s career a year earlier when Serena couldn’t notch Grand Slam title No. 24 then, either. Now, Andreescu may be ready to make her mark on the game. Getting by Serena was a big step. Andreescu might join the all-timers one day.
When another Grand Slam season gets underway in January in Australia, the tennis world really might be turned upside down. Novak Djokovic’s early departure along with the 38-year-old Federer’s and Stan Wawrinka’s losses in the next round were shocking, along with the early collapse of all of the super women’s stars except Serena.
SERENA, FEDERER AND NADAL IN A DIFFERENT WORLD
The young women’s stars such as Osaka, Sloane Stephens, Madison Keys, Simona Halep and Ashleigh Barty, along with Medvedev, Berrettini, Dominic Thiem, Stefanos Tsitsipas and Felix Auger-Aliassime among the men aren’t likely to evolve into all-time stars the way Serena, Federer and Nadal have.
That’s just the reality of big-time tennis. Serena, Federer and Nadal are players for the ages, just like Rod Laver was. Their fan bases are in for a major change, or they can switch to the sometimes unpredictability of this new group.
James Beck is the long-time tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspaper. He can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. See his Post and Courier columns at
2019 US Open: A common road led by contrasting routes for Dominik Koepfer and Hyeon Chung
Amid the huddle of early-round exits and some scattered withdrawals, a couple of players made the most of opportunities they received at the 2019 US Open. Dominik Koepfer and Hyeon Chung came through the qualifying rounds to win their initial couple of rounds with conviction and make their way forward even as rest of the playing field blew open around them.
Being qualifiers is the denominator common to them this week. Yet, in a way, the 23-year-old Chung is trudging a familiar route as compared with the 25-year-old Koepfer who is a relative newer face to watch at the Slams.
In 2018, Chung had made it to his first semi-final at a Major – at the Australian Open – taking down then six-time champion Novak Djokovic in the fourth round. The 2017 Next Gen ATP Finals’ titlist reached a career-high of 19 in the world after his Australian Open jaunt in 2018. Koepfer, on the other hand, is yet to break into the top-100 – with a career-high of no. 113 attained in the second-week of August. His best result at the Majors – before his fourth-round appearance at the US Open – was reaching the second round at Wimbledon this year.
None of these differences in the respective roads they have travelled on the Tour mattered as they tried to make it to the main draw. Chung’s injuries that kept him away from the circuit (for almost five months this year) meant he had to start from scratch, at the Challenger level. Koepfer’s being a mainstay on the Challenger circuit – for now – meant he, too, would start from the same position.
In doing so, the sport has made levellers out of them. Their past results do not matter. It is how they do against the opponent of the day that matters. Three qualifying rounds followed by the sterner main-draw test that also comes by way of lengthier matches. In this regard, Chung has already faced two such difficult matches in his first two rounds this week against Ernesto Escobedo and Fernando Verdasco in which he had to play five-setters to extricate himself.
The draw’s narrowing has also meant the task ahead of them has gotten harder. This is also where their paths diverge once again. If Tulane University alumnus in Koepfer is the equivalent of a dark horse, Chung’s previous experience makes him a dangerous floater.
If the two end up being truthful to this tag of theirs, the chaos component at this year’s US Open will be the accentuation separating itself from the monotonous.
2019 US Open, And The Growth In The Divide Between Players And Officials
The 2019 US Open has barely begun but off-court news surrounding the sport’s refereeing officials have reverberated more than the on-court results.
Argentinian chair umpire Damian Steiner was removed by the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) for giving interviews without consulting the ATP about accepting those. Among the players, Nick Kyrgios and Serena Williams continued with their less-than-respectful behaviour. Kyrgios towards the ATP which docked him $113,000 in fines for his rants against Fergus Murphy in Cincinnati. And, Williams towards Carlos Ramos, who umpired her 2018 US Open final against Naomi Osaka.
These incidents are revealing of the dichotomy spanning the players and the officials’ positions. Let us look at the players’ side of this chasm first. Kyrgios’ had no remorse about his behaviour against Murphy. Neither was he upset about being fined. Nonetheless, he attempted to duck from his mistakes by blaming the ATP for the penalty.
“Not at all. The ATP is pretty corrupt anyway, so I’m not fussed about it at all,” Kyrgios replied to a question about the fine in his post-match press conference. He, then, turned into a quasi-interrogator as if perplexed by the question, and the fine. His rhetorical question was, “I got fined 113K for what? Why are we talking about something that happened three weeks ago when I just chopped up someone first round?”
Kyrgios’ lackadaisical approach towards rectifying his errors was infuriating. But perhaps not to the same level as the exasperation evoked by Williams’ words, in her press conference.
After her first-round win over Maria Sharapova, Williams, in response to a question about Ramos not umpiring her matches at the event this year, chose to be snarky instead of giving a straight answer. “Yeah, I don’t know who that is,” she stated impassively as though the person and the events of the previous year did not concern or involve her.
Now, imagine a scenario in which either Murphy or Ramos, or both wanted to speak up and finally decide to share their vexations about receiving such attitude from the players in an interview. They cannot even do that without seeking permission from the sport’s governing authorities. Moreover, a message was sent in making an example out of Steiner that umpires did not have the backing of their job if they decided to forgo the rules.
The game’s viewers may take it as in indication that tennis’ rules belonged to the “never to be broken” category. However, this move will only embolden the players to be more abrasive and impolite to the umpires. Instead of looking at them as maintainers of the game for the duration of the match.
Case in point: Stefanos Tsitsipas’ ranting at Damien Dumussois when the Frenchman asked him to quicken his time at change of ends. “You have something against me. You’re French, probably. … You’re all weirdos,” he went on, insulting not only the umpire but also his nationality, and his countrymen.
Undoubtedly, it was said in momentary anger because of how the match was turning against him. Yet, if the rules are to be so correctly enforced – and they were in this instance, in Dumussois asking the eighth-seed to speed up – players ought not to complain.
However, grievances – actual and perceived – are bound to come up. As such, sanctioning players with fines (and even suspension) for raging at the umpires is a stop-gap remedy. Players will not – and did not – hesitate to fulfil the terms of their punishment. They will also continue with their tirades, as and when things do not go their way in a match.
On the other hand, for the umpires, this is like a repetitive cycle of viciousness. Tennis’ managerial authorities need to incorporate a system in which the umpires get to openly communicate about the players’ misconduct without being isolated, and treated as the sport’s second-rung members.
Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova’s US Open clash is about revival as much as about resurgence
The two household names are set to lock horns at Flushing Meadows on Monday.
Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova have played each other 21 times since they first faced each other across the net in the fourth round of the 2004 Miami Open. But their meeting in the opening round of the 2019 US Open will be the first time they will be meeting each other at Flushing Meadows.
The draw’s pick both shocked and awed everyone. Even though the American’s records against the Russian – except for two back-to-back losses in 2004 – proclaim it to be a lopsided rivalry. This one-sidedness of the rivalry notwithstanding, the momentousness of their meeting is undeniable.
The reason for that is the intertwining of their careers, even when their professional spheres digressed and separated in the unfathomable of ways. Williams was the opponent against whom the 16-year-old Sharapova won her first Major at the 2004 Wimbledon. Later that year, Sharapova won her second match against the 23-time Grand Slam champion at the WTA finals to take a lead in their head-to-head. It was the only time the five-time Grand Slam champion was ahead of her older colleague. Each time thereafter Williams played Sharapova, she made sure that her lead between her and her rival was never under any threat.
The head-to-head heft in Williams’ favour against Sharapova would not have been reminded so frequently and often with biting vehemence had it not been for one incident.
In the days leading up to the release of Sharapova’s autobiography in 2016, there was frequent attribution (based on the book excerpts) to Williams crossing Sharapova’s path, both on and off the court. The contents of the book itself were not so focused towards the world no. 8 but the cut-out portions of the book made it seem like Sharapova was envisioning Williams as more than her professional nemesis.
That the ladies never got a chance to play since Sharapova’s return to the Tour after her 15-month ban ended in 2017 kept these externally-driven flames raging. Their fourth-round face-off at the 2018 French Open was called off at the last minute after Williams withdrew with an injury. Had the two met a year ago, emotions would not have been as high as they are now, before their designated clash on Monday, 26th August.
Or, perhaps not considering what this opening match connotes for the six-time US Open champion at the venue.
The infamy surrounding Williams’ behaviour against Naomi Osaka in 2018 final has not subsided, and opinions are still divided about her being wronged by Carlos Ramos. This is Williams’ chance for side-lining the recent past by giving her present a strong start. Even if it paradoxically comes through against an old, equally time-tested combatant.
Sam Stosur Produces Comeback To Reach First WTA Final For 28 Months In Guangzhou
As The Laver Cup Grows, So Does The Uncertainty Concerning Men’s Team Events
Stefanos Tsitsipas ‘Honoured’ To Make Laver Cup Debut
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga beats Pierre Hugues Herbert to reach the quarter finals in Metz
Mixed Fortunes For Russian Stars Medvedev And Khachanov In St Petersburg
Revitalized Roger Federer Sets Sight On Ending 11-Year US Open Title Drought
(VIDEO) Where Do You Want To Be When Your 70? Ubaldo’s Latest Exchange With Roger Federer
Andy Roddick Rate The Chances Of The Big Three At The US Open
Roger Federer Slams Claim He Influences Scheduling At US Open
Mats Wilander Questions Federer’s US Open Hopes, Serena’s Consistency And Kyrgios’ Antics
(VIDEO) US Open Day 14: Rafael Nadal Ends The Tournament With An Extraordinary Win
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Bianca Andreescu Is The Queen Of New York
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Daniil Medvedev Stands In The Way Of Nadal’s 19th Grand Slam Title
(VIDEO) US Open Day 11: Why Bianca Andreescu Toppling Williams Will Not Be A Shock
(VIDEO) US Open Day 10: Matteo Berrettini Survives Epic To Book Showdown With Nadal
Hot Topics2 days ago
Roger Federer To Play Duo Of Tennis Stars In South American Exhibitions
Latest news2 days ago
Pre-Wimbledon Shake-Up Sees Birmingham Lose Premier Status And Mallorca Gain Men’s Tournament
Hot Topics2 days ago
‘Enjoy Staying Relevant’ – Nick Kyrgios Hits Back At Rafter’s Suspension Call
Latest news2 days ago
French Open Finalist Marketa Vondrousova Undergoes Surgery
ATP2 days ago
Casper Ruud beats Alexander Bublik to win his first indoor match in St. Petersburg
Focus2 days ago
Serena Williams Confident In Bid For Grand Slam History Claims Patrick Mouratoglou
ATP1 day ago
Daniil Medvedev Scores Sponsorship Deal With BMW
Hot Topics1 day ago
Winning The Laver Cup Will Not Be Easy, Says Roger Federer