Roger Federer moved on from his early-round struggles in stunning style with a 6-2 6-2 6-1 demolition of Dan Evans in the US Open Third Round.
The Swiss, 38, was a long way off his best during his victories over Sumit Nagal and Damir Dzumhur. But he found form against the Brit and put on a masterclass for the Arthur Ashe Stadium crowd.
It began in game four of the opening set, when Federer put massive pressure on Evans’ serve by earning three break points. The Brit saved all three, but it was definitely a warning sign.
Sure enough, two games later the 20-time Grand Slam Champion broke to establish a 4-2 lead. And the World No.58 offered no further resistance in the set as the Swiss wrapped it up 6-2 in just 29 minutes.
Sadly for British fans and neutrals, the match became even more one-sided from that point on. In the second set, Federer produced virtually flawless tennis. He hit 20 winners and made just three unforced errors as he won it even more quickly than the first.
Unsurprisingly, Evans looked increasingly lost against such a barrage of quality. He tried to compete and, remarkably, only made three unforced errors, but he simply could not cause any problems for the Swiss on a slow court that does not suit his style of play.
The fourth game of the second set summed up the match. The Brit served well and sent down three good serves. Unfortunately for him, all three came flying back past him as the World No.3 hit three consecutive winners: a precise forehand down the line, a floated backhand and a crisp forehand. He broke to love.
Federer applies the finishing touches
By the time the third set started, any hope of a contest had long since evaporated. Federer continued to play at his imperious best, while the Brit carried on trying – and failing – to compete.
Just 80 minutes after the first ball was struck, the five-time US Open champion clinched victory with a comfortable hold.
In the on-court interview, Brad Gilbert asked Federer if he did anything differently to the previous two rounds.
“Nothing,” the Swiss replied. “Sometimes you just have to trust your team-up, your warm-ups and everything you’ve done for so long. Sometimes it doesn’t work and sometimes it does.”
“Maybe also Danny wasn’t feeling quite (as energetic) today so that helped me a little bit. He played yesterday so that was maybe an advantage for me. I was able to take advantage and play really good tennis. I really enjoyed myself out here today.”
Federer’s next appearance at Flushing Meadows will be against either David Goffin or Pablo Carreno Busta. The Swiss told Gilbert he is expecting a tougher match than against Evans. From a neutral point of view, hopefully he is right, because this was a mauling.
Roger Federer Can Win Australian Open, Says Laver
The 81-year-old speaks out about the world No.3.
Tennis legend Rod Laver has back world No.3 Roger Federer to add to his record-breaking grand slam tally in the future.
The 38-year-old currently holds the record for most major singles won by a man at 20. However, both Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal are closing in on that tally. Djokovic is currently on 16 and Nadal in one adrift on 19 following his latest triumph at the US Open. Meanwhile, Federer has only featured in the final in one out of the last six grand slam tournaments. Doing so at Wimbledon in July where he failed to convert two championship points against Djokovic. His last major title took place at the 2017 Australian Open.
Despite the recent lack of major silverware for the Swiss Maestro, Australian great Laver believes he can still challenge for the biggest titles in the sport. Saying that it is possible that Federer could continue playing until the age of 40.
“He seems to be fine and that’s what counts. If you love the game as much as you do, that’s fine.” He commented on Federer’s longevity in the sport.
“I also give Roger a very good chance of winning the Australian Open again in Melbourne in January.”
Laver admits that it is possible that the two other members of the Big Three could end their careers with more titles than Federer. Nadal is five years younger than him and Djokovic is six. However, he believes there is one thing that separates him from the others.
“Nadal, Djokovic and Federer are all big champions. But Roger surpasses tennis, the world of sport, and sports in general in a way that no one in history has done before him. He is the most recognized athlete in the world and a figurehead for this great game.”
The first encounter between Laver and Federer took place 13 years ago in Melbourne at the Australian Open. Since then, the two have formed a bond with Laver saying they ‘clicked’ straight away.
The biggest example of the friendship between the two is perhaps best illustrated by the Laver Cup. An annual team tournament where Europe takes on the rest of the world. Similar to that of Golf’s Ryder Cup. Named in honour of the tennis great, Federer is one of the co-founders of the event. Which has since been granted a place within the ATP Calendar. Although no ranking points are on offer.
This year’s edition will be held in Switzerland for the first time. Critics have been quick to point out the disparity between the two teams. Europe consists of all players ranked inside the top 20 compared to one from the world team. However, Laver dismissed the significance.
“I do not think so. The team World has excelled in both Laver Cups in doubles and also celebrated one or two big victories in singles. I expect it to be exciting.” He said.
The three-day 2019 Laver Cup will get underway in Geneva on Friday.
List of players participating
Daniil Medvedev Gave Rafa Fans The Scare Of A Lifetime
Charleston Post and Courier columnist James Beck reflects on the US Open men’s final and what the future might have in store.
NEW YORK — Rafa, you gave your followers quite a scare.
No. 19 looked like it was in the books when you got the first break point of the ninth game of the third set. But it wasn’t, and the second break point flew by as well.
Oh well, it was just 5-4, Daniil Medvedev. There was still time to close out the match in three sets. But after deadlocking the set at 5-5, you won only one point in the last two games of the set.
IT MIGHT BE A LONG NIGHT
Settle back, Rafa Nadal fans. It might be a long night.
The men’s final of Sunday’s U.S. Open was going the distance, even though Nadal served with double game points in the decisive 10th game of the fourth set, but still lost the set.
Nadal even served for the match with a 5-2 lead in the fifth set. He lost that one on a time violation first-serve penalty leading to a double fault to end the game.
Was it time to get worried about Rafa getting No. 19 this night? Was this going to be a Serena-like case of bad fortune for Nadal? Of course, Serena Williams one day earlier had failed again for an all-time tying No. 24 Grand Slam title.
It could have happened to Nadal, too. Anything could have, judging from the way his tall and amazingly agile and quick Russian opponent was playing.
MIGHTY SERVE ENDED A HISTORIC FINAL
Nadal looked like he had a lock on No. 19 again before wasting two match points with Medvedev serving the ninth game of the fifth set.
Rafa even had to fight off a break point in the 10th game before ending the nearly five-hour marathon with a perfectly place serve down the middle.
He went flat on his back in disbelief, and Medvedev went around the net. The two embraced.
It, indeed, was one of the most memorable moments in the history of Grand Slam tennis.
Finally, a 7-5, 6-2, 5-7, 4-6, 6-4 victory that pushed Nadal’s Grand Slam championship total to within one of Roger Federer’s all-time record.
AN AMAZING PERFORMANCE BY BOTH PLAYERS
This was simply an amazing match that left a packed Arthur Ashe Stadium, mostly of Nadal supporters, drained. It was that riveting.
This had to be one of the greatest U.S. Open finals ever.
Medvedev put on an unthinkable display of grit and talent, a sheer desire to win. Medvedev and Nadal were like acrobats at times as they moved around the court to pull off amazing tennis stunts. Anything was possible because of the two players’ athletic abilities.
Nadal is definitely for real. But if his 23-year-old Russian opponent is for real, as he certainly appeared Sunday night, the Australian Open isn’t going to be a picnic for Federer, Nadal or the injured Novak Djokovic, or anyone else.
And then there’s the French Open where Rafa will be heavily favored to get No. 20 if he fails in Melbourne. Of course, if Rafa plays the way he did in the first two sets on Sunday, he may notch No. 20 Down Under.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? WHY NOT A DRAW?
What happens if both Nadal and Federer are tied for the all-time lead with 20 Grand Slam titles each?
If they’re deadlocked in another year or two, it might be time for a permanent dual timeout for both players. As sad as such a day would be, it would be a day to celebrate. Co-record holders wouldn’t be a bad way to go since retirement is inevitable for these two great players.
Although Federer demonstrated at Wimbledon and Nadal showed Sunday night, they can still rival the best tennis has to offer, but the rest of the men’s tennis game isn’t going to take a break waiting for these two greats to retire. Medvedev and his likes will continue to close the gap until there isn’t one.
PRESSURE WILL CONTINUE TO BUILD
As a result of what happened in Sunday’s U.S. Open final, the days ahead will add even more pressure for both Nadal and Federer each time a Grand Slam rolls around.
Federer already has felt that pressure, both here and at Wimbledon, as he tried to widen his lead over Nadal and Djokovic. Even Nadal seemed to feel some of the same pressure Sunday night while trying to close out Medvedev.
After defeating Federer in the Wimbledon final, Djokovic called Federer “one of the greatest ever” in his acceptance comments after the match. Federer frowned, but Djokovic was right.
Djokovic knows, because he’s not out of the all-time race just yet.
It would be nice if Federer and Nadal could/or would retire at the same time, and join Rod Laver as the greatest men’s tennis players ever. But just not quite yet.
James Beck is the long-time tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspaper. He can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. See his Post and Courier columns at
US Open A Ratings Hit In North America
Both the men’s and women’s finals managed to attract some record TV viewing figures.
Bianca Andreescu’s win over Serena Williams in the final of the US Open was the most watched women’s final on ESPN of all time, according to official figures.
The Canadian 19-year-old rallied to a 6-3, 7-5, win over the former world No.1 to claim her first grand slam title. Her triumphed attracted an overnight rating of 2.7 million on ESPN. A 13% increase on last year (2.4) when Naomi Osaka defeated Williams. At its peak, which was towards the end of the second set, the rating was as high as 3.9. ESPN has also confirmed that the 2019 women’s final was their joint-highest US Open rating of all time.
Across the border, Andreescu’s win also made history in her home country of Canada. An average audience of 3.4 million watched her match on TSN and RDS with a peak of 5.3 million. Making in the networks most watched tennis match in history. It is also the most-watched broadcast since the Toronto Raptors won the 2019 NBA Championships. TSN has also noted that Andreescu’s run has helped them achieve a 69% rise in views compared to 2018 to 10.7 million people watching the grand slam at some point. Meanwhile, their digital platforms have achieved a 145% year-on-year rise with 13 million impressions on TSN’s social media platforms.
There was also success for the networks with the men’s final. Rafael Nadal edged out Daniil Medvedev in a dramatic five-set encounter. The Spaniard was leading by two sets, before his opponent drew back to draw level. Forcing a tense decider. Their encounter was ESPN’s most popular men’s US Open final since 2015 and a 33% increase on 12 months ago. It attracted an overnight rating of 2.0. The 2015 clash between Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer scored a 2.4 rating.
The strong broadcast numbers coincide with what has been a record year for the New York major. A record 737,872 fans attended the event over two weeks with the Arthur Ashe Stadium managing to have 23 out of 24 sell out sessions. The number doesn’t include the ‘Fan Week’ that took place before the start of the main draw. 115,355 people attended that to bring the overall figure to 853,227.
French Open Finalist Marketa Vondrousova Undergoes Surgery
Roger Federer To Play Duo Of Tennis Stars In South American Exhibitions
‘Relaxed’ Su-Wei Hsieh Saves Match Point To Oust Muguruza In Osaka
Roger Federer On Davis Cup And Olympic Plans For 2020
Novak Djokovic Eyes Tokyo Return As He Provides Injury Update
Revitalized Roger Federer Sets Sight On Ending 11-Year US Open Title Drought
Roger Federer On Idols, Achievements and What Advice He Would Give To Others
Roger Federer Slams Claim He Influences Scheduling At US Open
Andy Roddick Rate The Chances Of The Big Three At The US Open
Mats Wilander Questions Federer’s US Open Hopes, Serena’s Consistency And Kyrgios’ Antics
(VIDEO) US Open Day 14: Rafael Nadal Ends The Tournament With An Extraordinary Win
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Bianca Andreescu Is The Queen Of New York
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Daniil Medvedev Stands In The Way Of Nadal’s 19th Grand Slam Title
(VIDEO) US Open Day 11: Why Bianca Andreescu Toppling Williams Will Not Be A Shock
(VIDEO) US Open Day 10: Matteo Berrettini Survives Epic To Book Showdown With Nadal
ATP3 days ago
Roger Federer Can Win Australian Open, Says Laver
Focus3 days ago
Nao Hibino beats Misaki Doi in all-Japanese final in Hiroshima
Davis Cup2 days ago
Juan Martin Del Potro Hits Back At Claim Made By Pique Over Davis Cup Involvement
Focus3 days ago
Karolina Pliskova lifts her fourth title of the season in Zhengzhou
ATP2 days ago
ATP Cup Draw Places Andy Murray On Collision Course With Federer
ATP2 days ago
‘Looks Like He Should Be Suspended’ – Pat Rafter Questions ATP’s Management Of Nick Kyrgios
WTA3 days ago
Rebecca Peterson clinches her maiden WTA title
Hot Topics2 days ago
Despite New WTA Guidelines, Could Kim Clijsters’ Return Be Marred By Aberration?