Stan Wawrinka Edges Tsitsipas In French Open Classic - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Grand Slam

Stan Wawrinka Edges Tsitsipas In French Open Classic

Wawrinka set up a quarter-final clash with Federer by outlasting Tsitsipas in a titanic five-set encounter that lasted over five hours.

Published

on

Stan Wawrinka (@rolandgarros on Twitter)

Stan Wawrinka battled to a 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 3-6 8-6 win over Stefanos Tsitsipas in a five-hour epic in the fourth round of the French Open.

 

The Swiss, 34, had to draw on every ounce of determination and energy in his body to get the better of his talented young foe, who impressed everyone watching with his superb shot-making abilities.

And there will be a lot resting on the World No.28’s recovery if he is going to continue his bid for a second title at Roland Garros. His quarter-final opponent will be friend and compatriot Roger Federer, who will be feeling fresh after he breezed past Leonardo Mayer in straight sets.

In the first set, Wawrinka and Tsitsipas virtually matched each other stroke for stroke. Their serving percentages were very high and very similar, their winners (11) and unforced errors (12) tallies were identical and there was only one break point in the entire set.

Consequently, the set was dominated by the respective server throughout. The inevitable tie-break followed the same pattern, and there was nothing between the players until the Greek gifted the set to the Swiss with a double fault when he was 6-7 behind.

Tsitsipas wins thrilling second set

Stefanos Tsitsipas (@rolandgarros on Twitter)

While the match did not really catch light in the opener, that soon changed in the second set. Tsitsipas adopted a more aggressive approach. He went for his shots more from the baseline and came into the net whenever possible.

For the first three games, it worked superbly as he held twice and wore Wawrinka down in between to earn a break and establish a 3-0 lead.

However, the Swiss player responded superbly. He battled to a hold in game four. Then he fashioned a break point opportunity and seized it with a brilliant cross-court backhand pass.

There was a brief lull in the drama as both players held comfortably. But then it all kicked off again in game eight as a fired-up Tsitsipas produced some great shots to earn his second break of the set.

After Wawrinka raised his level to break back immediately, the Greek did not react well. He smashed three water bottles and received a code violation warning from the umpire.

That release of frustration almost enabled Tsitsipas to break the Swiss in game ten, but the three-time Grand Slam champion saved four break points and clung on to make it 5-5.

As it turned out, that hold only delayed the outcome that had seemed likely for a while, as the World No.6 broke Wawrinka in game twelve to level the match at one-set-all.

Wawrinka responds like the champion he is

The 24th seed realised he needed to improve in the third set. He started that process by serving better than he had in the second set and continued it by putting pressure on Tsitsipas’ serve.

Consequently, Wawrinka almost broke in game three and game five. However, while the Greek survived on both those occasions, he could not do anything in game seven.

First, the Swiss player hit a brilliant backhand winner that landed right on the sideline. Then, at 15-30, he unleashed a powerful forehand winner that bounced just inside the same line. And finally, when he was faced with two break points against, Tsitsipas missed a backhand.

After another comfortable hold, Wawrinka forced break points on the Greek’s serve for the fourth time in succession. And for the third time in four tries, Tsitsipas clung onto his serve.

This only delayed the inevitable, as the Swiss remained rock-solid on his serve to close out the third set.

Tsitsipas forces a decider but Wawrinka wins it

Stan Wawrinka and Stefanos Tsitsipas (@rolandgarros on Twitter)

Tsitsipas made a great start to the fourth set. He broke Wawrinka in game two and saved a break point in game three to forge a 3-0 lead.

The World No.28 steadied himself to hold and then broke back in game five. However, the Greek applied a lot of pressure in the next game and Wawrinka faltered to enable him to break again.

That virtually finished the set, as the Swiss made no impression in Tsitsipas’ next two service games. The World No.6 held twice to clinch the set 6-3 and take the match into a decider.

For the first ten games, the decider was a mostly cagey affair as neither player took too many risks when their opponent was serving. The exceptions to this were games one and five when Wawrinka saved break points.

And, when the set came to life in game eleven, the Swiss found himself in trouble on serve again. Tsitsipas earned three separate break point chances. However, he squandered them all and the set continued.

After two comfortable holds of serve, Wawrinka led 7-6. That enabled him to swing freely on the Greek’s serve, which is exactly what he did.

He hit a succession of powerful cross-court shots which led to errors from Ttitsipas and a 15-40 scoreline. Then he knifed a superb backhand just beyond the grasp of the World No.6 to seize his first match point.

Grand Slam

‘He Could Become An Excellent Player’ – Remember Roger Federer’s Grand Slam Debut 21 Years Later

More than two decades ago on this day was the start of where it all began for the former world No.1. But what did he and his opponent think about his first match played at a major?

Published

on

Roger Federer at the 1999 French Open

On this day 21 years ago the most decorated grand slam champion in the history of men’s tennis began his major career.

 

Roger Federer embarked upon the 1999 French Open as the youngest player in the field and yet to break into the world’s top 100. Aged 17, the Swiss player was yet to play in the final of an ATP Tournament and only managed to enter the Roland Garros main draw thanks to a wild card. His opponent was third seed Pat Rafter who at the time was at the peak of his career. The Australian had won back-to-back US Open titles leading up to the tournament.

Undoubtedly the odds were piled heavily against a young and inexperienced Federer, but he still managed to make his mark. Surprisingly taking the first set before Rafter fought back to eventually win 5-7, 6-3, 6-0, 6-2.

“The young man from Switzerland could be one of the people who will shape the next ten years,” the French sports newspaper L’Equipe wrote at the time.

Rafter echoed a similar view to L’Equipe during his post-match media engagements. He went on to become one of the few players to have a perfect winning record against Federer of 3-0. Also defeating him twice during the 2001 season.

“The boy impressed me very much,” he said. “If he works hard and has a good attitude, he could become an excellent player.”

Rafter’s prediction came true but even he at the time didn’t expect the 17-year-old to go on and become one of the greatest. Now Federer holds the records for most grand slam titles (20), most weeks as world No.1 (310) and has won more ATP Awards than anybody else (37). Approaching the age of 39, he remains a prominent fixture in the world’s top 10 18 years on from his debut.

Federer has spoken about his first taste of a grand slam a few times in the past. One of his most notable observations was during a conversation he had with Rafter at the 2011 Wimbledon Championships. When speaking about losing his one set lead, the Swiss maestro said it was partly to do with his mental weakness and showing too much respect to the top guns at the time.

”I was up a set and I was just 17 years old and I wasn’t expected to win,” Federer recounted. ”I think I got broken in the second set and I was like ‘Oh, God, what am I doing?’
”Next thing you know I’m losing 6-3, 6-0, 6-2. It was very mental. I had a lot of respect for the older generation who were already accomplished. Obviously stars like Pat were, for me, people I really looked up to, even though I knew I could beat them. Mentally I was not so solid.”

Rafter has also admitted that his 1999 victory was partly down to the mental weakness of his rival during a 2018 interview with Blick newspaper. However, he blames losing the first set on never playing Federer before.

“I met Roger for the first time at the French Open in 1999. It was his grand slam debut. Since I did not know his game at the time, it took me some time to adjust to him. That’s why I lost the first set,” he said.
“Roger’s biggest handicap was his mental maturity, he was only 17 years old. That was one of the reasons why I came back and win in four sets.”

Whilst the French Open was where it all began for Federer, his record in the major is the worst out of the four grand slams. It is the only one he has failed to win multiple times, claiming his sole title back in 2009. Overall, he has played in the main draw 18 times with a win-loss of 70-17.

How old was the current top 10 when Federer made his grand slam debut?

  1. Novak Djokovic – 12
  2. Rafael Nadal – 12
  3. Dominic Thiem – 5
  4. Roger Federer – 17
  5. Daniil Medvedev – 3
  6. Stefanos Tsitsipas – 9 months
  7. Alexander Zverev – 2
  8. Matteo Berrettini – 3
  9. Gael Monfils – 12
  10. David Goffin – 8

(numbers in years unless otherwise stated)

Continue Reading

Grand Slam

‘Global Announcement’ Regarding Revised 2020 Calendar In The Works, Says French Open Chief

Guy Forget has issued an update regarding the current status of the clay-court major.

Published

on

The governing bodies of tennis are hoping to announce their plans for the remainder of the 2020 season in unison, according to the tournament director of the French Open.

 

Guy Forget has told French radio station Europe 1 that he is working with the ITF, ATP and WTA on a ‘global announcement’ regarding what the rest of the tennis season would look like when it resumes. All professional events have been either cancelled or suspended since March due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There are hopes that the sport could resume in August, however, there is still uncertainty around the US Open with a final decision set to be made in June.

The uncertainty surrounding Flushing Meadows is also problematic for the French Open, which is set to take just two weeks after the event concludes. Forget has stated that he is working with the USTA to ensure that the two major events do not collide. The French Open had originally planned to start on May 24th before being delayed due to the pandemic.

“The official announcement has not been made yet. It (the French Open) will probably be between the end of September and the beginning of October,” Forget told Europe 1.
“We’ve been working closely with the ATP, the WTA and the ITF to make a global announcement on what the circuit will be like until the end of the year.
“There are so many question marks. The city of New York is more affected by the coronavirus than France. They also have a lot of organisation problems, they will make an announcement mid-June to say how it’s going to be like for the US Open.”

Whilst the USTA is contemplating taking place behind closed doors, Forget is confident that his event will be able to welcome fans in some capacity. At present, France has banned all events that involve 5000 or more people. More than 500,000 tickets were sold for the tournament last year.

“We’ll see how the situation is in a couple of months. We will adapt to what the government will say. We have to be ambitious and optimistic,” he said.

The French Open is scheduled to be held from September 20th until October 4th. Rafael Nadal and Ash Barty are the defending champions in the men’s and women’s draws.

Continue Reading

Grand Slam

Chances Of Fan-Less US Open Rising Amid Warning From Former Champion Marin Cilic

The former world No.3 believes such a move would devalue the tournament, but it is the best option the USTA has?

Published

on

The last player outside of the Big Four to win the US Open title believes the motion to play the event behind closed doors will feel like playing practice matches instead of a grand slam.

 

2014 champion Marin Cilic has voiced his concerns as the United States Tennis Association (USTA) continues to ponder what to do with the major event. All professional tennis tournaments have been suspended since March due to the COVID-19 pandemic with officials hoping to restart the Tour in August. However, there are concerns about the chances of the US Open taking place as originally planned due to New York being one of the most affected states in America by Coronavirus. More than 20,000 people have died in New York from the virus.

One option under consideration is hosting the event without any fans due to fears that the venue could become a COVID-19 hotspot with many people gathering in one place. Last year a record 737,872 fans visited the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center over two weeks. Such a move would be a huge financial loss for the organisers, but the event would still be able to go ahead. However, Cilic isn’t convinced that it would be the right move.

“I just feel that it’s going to more or less feel like practice matches,” he said during an interview with Reuters.
“It’s always going to be … in the years to come, ‘oh, you know that guy won a U.S. Open in 2020 without fans’. I don’t think it’s going to have that weight…
“It wouldn’t be the best scenario.”

Whilst it may not be the best scenario in the eyes of Cilic, it does appear that the USTA will be heading in that direction. Earlier this week New York Governor Andrew Cuomo posted a message on Twitter in which he said he is willing to partner with sports teams who will play events without fans. A possible lifeline for the US Open.

“New York State is ready and willing to partner with major sports teams that are interested in playing games safely, without fans. If our professional sports teams can make it work (and be safe) on their end, we’re supportive,” he wrote.

Originally the CEO of the USTA, Mike Dose, said it was ‘highly unlikely’ that the tournament would be played behind closed doors. However, that view has since significantly changed with more now leaning in favour of that option.

Lew Sherr is the Chief Revenue Officer of the USTA. Speaking to The Sports Business Journal, he said he has been surprised by the reception he has received from sponsors over the idea of a no-fan US Open with many viewing it as an historic event.

“Two months ago, it just didn’t feel like you could stage the celebration or the spectacle that is the U.S. Open in a no-fan scenario and have it be what we think of as the U.S. Open,” Sherr said.
“As we’ve gone forward, I’ve come around to recognizing what an achievement it would be to play, and how much our fans are missing the game and would be excited to see the competition, and that you need to think about it differently. It’s a different event. It would be broadcast differently, it would be consumed differently, it’s not just playing the U.S. Open as you know it, with empty seats.”

A final decision on the US Open will be made next month.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending