Chris Evert’s suggestion to swap the days of the men’s and women’s final at Wimbledon has failed to generate any high-profile support on the first day of the Championships.
Evert, who won three titles at the Grass-Court major during her career, revived the debate over sexism at the event earlier this week. During an interview with The Times newspaper, she said that having the men’s final on the last day of the competition treated women like ‘second class citizens.’ The championships have a tradition of hosting the women’s final on the Saturday followed by the men’s on Sunday.
‘I think it [the final] could change. In a lot of ways, it’s a mirror of the world. It’s still a man’s world.” She said.
‘It’s definitely not equal right now and this is the time that we are having more and more conversations about equality.
‘Wimbledon are very traditional and historical. They are not going to make any radical change at this point and put the men on Saturday and the women on Sunday.’
Such radical idea would be huge at an event the prides itself on tradition. Wimbledon is the only tennis tournament in the world that requires players to wear all white clothing. A rule that dates back to the Victorian era when it was believed that wearing white was the best way to hide sweat.
‘I don’t really care’
On Monday at The All England Club there was little excitement about calls to change the schedule of the women’s final. Victoria Azarenka was one of the first players asked about the subject. WTA Council member Azarenka defeated Ekaterina Alexandrova 7-6(4), 6-3, in her first round match.
“I honestly don’t really care about it. I don’t know how much will it benefit.” The Belarusian said during her press conference.
“I’m sure she might have said that from a viewers’ perspective or from also the TV slots, but we have done that in US Open couple years. It was unusual circumstances when we played Sunday final first time with Serena instead of the Saturday, and it was really cool.
“I really doubt that Wimbledon will change their tradition, because that never happens.“
Caroline Wozniacki echoed Azarenka’s comments during her press conference. The Australian Open champion has previously spoken out about equal rights. Although in this case, she believes things should not be changed.
“Personally I think about the equality, I have no problem. It’s always one half or the other playing Monday or Tuesday.” She said after defeating Vavara Lepchenko 6-0, 6-3.
“It really doesn’t make a difference to me if you play Monday or Tuesday. In my opinion, for the men to start on Monday, in case the winner play on Monday, having a bit more time in case they go far and play five sets.
“In my opinion, playing on a Saturday finals is fine for me. It’s good.”
On the men’s tour, Marin Cilic has questioned if any potential changes would have an impact. Insisting that any decision should be up to the tournament and nobody else. Cilic defeated Japan’s Yoshihito Nishioka in his opening match.
“I think it’s on the tournament to decide about those things. I still think that ladies matches are followed extremely well. I’m also watch a lot of those matches.” He said.
“So I think the atmosphere any kind of the day it’s amazing and I think the tournament prepares it extremely nice for both men and women, as well.”
Wimbledon officials have confirmed that they currently have no plans of changing their scheduling.
Grand Slam Matches Among 38 Suspicious Betting Alerts Over Past Three Months
The body is charge of monitoring match-fixing in the sport has issued their latest findings.
The International Tennis Integrity Agency has confirmed they have received ‘match alerts’ concerning a quartet of matches which took place at Grand Slam tournaments during the third quarter of 2021.
Two matches played at Wimbledon and a further two which took place at the US Open were flagged up, according to their quarterly report which was public on Tuesday. The names of the individuals involved in those matches are not made public whilst the ITIA investigate the matter. The alerts are received through their confidential Memoranda of Understanding with the regulated betting industry.
A total of 38 betting alerts were issued to the ITIA during the third quarter with the most coming from matches played on the Challenger Tour (13). There were also nine suspicious matches from ITF $25,000 tournaments on the men’s Tour and another seven linked to $15,000 events. To put that into context the women’s ITF Tour reported a total of three overall.
“It is important to note that an alert on its own is not evidence of match fixing,” the ITIA stated in their report.
“Unusual betting patterns can occur for many reasons other than match fixing – for example incorrect odds-setting; well-informed betting; player fitness, fatigue or form; playing conditions and personal circumstances.”
Five players have been sanctioned within the past three months for match-fixing offences with the most high-profile being Temur Ismailov from Uzbekistan. Ismailov, who reached a ranking high of 397th in 2016, was issued with a life ban after being found guilty of offences in addition to another suspension he was already serving.
The ITIA has also provisionally suspended six Moroccans and one Pervian player in connection with possible violations of anti-corruption rules.
The ITIA was created by the international governing bodies to investigate allegations against players and hand out sanctions. It is currently in the process of merging with the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme (TADP) and will oversee the global administration of the TADP from January 1st if it receives Board approval.
Number of alerts (third quarter of 2021 only)
- Wimbledon: 2
- US Open: 2
- ATP Challenger: 13
- ATP World Tour: 250 1
- Davis Cup: 1
- M25 Men’s – World Tennis Tour: 9
- M15 Men’s – World Tennis Tour: 7
- W15 Women’s – World Tennis Tour: 2
- W80 Women’s – World Tennis Tour: 1
Numbers: On The Unpredictability Of Women’s Grand Slam Tournaments
Over the past four years, every major tournament has been a hunting ground for new players, a sign of discontinuity at the top.
54 – the number of WTA players who’ve reached the quarterfinals at least once in the past 12 Slam tournaments.
Tennis experts and fans have often pointed out that men’s tennis hasn’t had much of a change of the guard in terms of big tournament winners, generally providing the same face-offs between players in the final rounds. At the same time, the last seasons of the WTA Tour have repeatedly been criticized for not providing any champions the public could become used to due to the steady turnover of winners and players competing in the last rounds of the most prestigious tournaments. To better understand if these assumptions are actually justified, we analysed the Slam draws from the past three years (starting with the 2018 US Open) and listed all the players (male and female) who reached a Major quarterfinal at least once, in an attempt to understand the differences between what’s going on the ATP and WTA tours.
41 male players have reached the quarterfinals of a Slam, while on the WTA circuit the 96 available slots have been occupied by no fewer than 54 different tennis players. We can also see this same discrepancy by looking at some other stats on the number of players to make it through only once to a Major quarterfinal: on the male tour, in the timeframe considered (the last twelve Slams played), there were 17 players, while in the female one the number rose to 21. The women whose only accomplishment was to reach one semi-final are over twice as many as the men who did the same: some of the male players are Pouille, Karatsev and Hurkacz, while the women’s list includes Sevastova, Anisimova, Strycova, Podoroska, Zidansek and Kerber.
The greatest difference between the two tours, however, can be found in the number of players who get past the semi-finals. There have only been four major tournament winners among ATP players in the past three calendar years: Djokovic (the Serbian won 7 times), Nadal (2), Thiem, and Medvedev. Among WTA players, on the other hand, there have been as many as eight different Slam tournament champions: Osaka (a four-time winner), Barty (2), Halep, Andreescu, Kenin, Swiatek, Krejcikova, and Raducanu.
Del Potro, Zverev, Federer, Berrettini and Tsistipas were the only male players to get to the finals, but there were no fewer than nine female players achieving the same result: Serena Williams (three times), Kvitova, Vondrousova, Muguruza, Azarenka, Brady, Pavlyuchenkova, Pliskova, and Fernandez. “One-time-winners” aren’t easy to find among male players, since all four major tournament-winners (Djokovic, Nadal, Thiem and Medvedev) have done well in several other Slams, which isn’t the case amongst the female players. In the eleven Slams that we’re analysing, two players (Andreescu and Raducanu) didn’t get any other important results other than their wins; in their case, if truth be told, the explanation to this probably lies in their very young age, and in the injuries they sustained, making their “isolated” wins more than understandable.
This fact should, however, be considered together with the cases of three other female players (Krejicikova, Swiatek and Kenin) who, in addition to their finals victory, only reached the quarterfinals once. The absence of continuity in today’s strongest female circuit-players can be inferred from an additional statistic: among male players in the past three years, Djokovic (10 times), Nadal (9), Federer (5), Thiem (5), Zverev (6), and Medvedev (5) got through to Major tournament quarterfinals at least five times, but amongst the female players only Serena Williams (6) and Barty (6) did the same.
Further confirmation of what we uncovered can be found by looking into the players in the top positions of the ATP and WTA rankings. Among the men, after the 2018 US Open, the only players who reached the first position are Djokovic and Nadal; meanwhile, Medvedev, Tsitsipas and Rublev have reached the Top 5 for the first time in the past three years. And let’s not forget Berrettini, Schwartzman, Bautista Agut, Shapovalov, and Ruud, who also made their debut in the Top 10.
In the WTA rankings, on the other hand, these past 36 months have seen Halep, Osaka and current number 1 Barty pass the queen’s crown around; compared to the men’s circuit, even more players have ascended to the Top 5 for the first time: Sabalenka, Andreescu, Bencic, Kenin. There are “only” two players, Swiatek and Krejcikova, who’ve gotten through to the first ten positions of the ranking in the time frame we’ve been looking at.
In conclusion, the tennis élite has a very different profile in the two tours. It’s a difference that is bound to be reduced as the likes of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic get older: but will the advent of new rivalries at the top be able to preserve the sport’s popularity?
Article by Ferruccio Roberti; translated by Giulia Bosatra; edited by Tommaso Villa
REPORT: Australian Open To Hold Qualifying In The Middle East During Build Up To Christmas
Provisional plans of how the first Grand Slam tournament of 2022 will take place has emerged.
It is understood that the Australian Open will hold their qualifying tournaments outside of the country for a second year in a row, according to information obtained by The Daily Mail and The Times newspapers.
Players hoping to secure their spot in the main draw of the Grand Slam are likely to be forced to miss out on the chance of celebrating Christmas on December 25th. According to the provisional plan, the event will likely conclude on December 24th and then players will have to travel to Australia afterwards via charter flights.
Dubai and Abu Dhabi are set to be the venues which will hold the men’s and women’s competitions. Both of those cities also held the qualifying event for this year’s Australian Open but in January. However, in 2022 the start date of the Grand Slam will revert back to its original time shot and therefore qualifying will have to take place earlier.
It is also understood that the players who already have secured a spot in the main draw of the Grand Slam will also have their Christmas plans affected. Health officials in Melbourne want those participating in warm-up events in the country prior to the Grand Slam to first spend time in a ‘control bubble’ where they will be allowed to practice and train.
Criag Tiley, who is the tournament director of the Australian Open, has previously suggested that players who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 could have less restrictions placed upon them.
“There will be different conditions for vaccinated versus unvaccinated,’ Tiley told The Controllables podcast in August. ‘If the conditions are vastly different it’s probably better to be vaccinated then you don’t have those different conditions.’
The plans are part of Tennis Australia’s COVID-19 protocol. The country currently has one of the world’s longest border closures related to the pandemic and is closed for most arrivals. Those who are allowed in are required to enter a 14-day quarantine or something similar which has been authorised by health authorities.
Recently the coach of world No.1 Ash Barty has said she may miss the season-ending WTA Finals with one of the reasons being due to Australia’s travel policy. Craig Tyzzer told reporters that Barty is wary that arriving late back in her home country and having to undergo quarantine will have a knock on effect on her off-season training.
The Australian Open main draw will start on January 17th.
Arthur Rinderknech beats Federico Delbonis to reach the second round in Antwerp
Novak Djokovic Undecided Over Playing Australian Open, Slams Speculation Over His Vaccination Status
Marin Cilic overcomes Damir Dzumhur at the Kremlin Cup in Moscow
Andrey Rublev defends his title at the Kremlin Cup in Moscow
Jannik Sinner leads the line-up in Antwerp
REPORT: Unvaccinated Players Set To Be Banned From Playing Australian Open
ATP Moves Closer To Staging Five More 12-Day Masters 1000 Events After Board Approval
WTA Luxembourg Open Axed Over Disagreements Between Tour And Organisers
Injured Roger Federer Says The ‘Worst Is Behind Him’ As He Targets Comeback In 2022
EXPLAINED: Why Novak Djokovic’s Latest Trip To Bosnia Has Caused Controversy
US Open, Steve Flink: “Djokovic’s loss had more to do with fatigue than pressure”
US Open, Steve Flink on the Murray-Tsitsipas Controversy
(VIDEO) Dominic Thiem, Juan Martin Del Potro Gathering Momentum In Comeback Bids
Steve Flink On Wimbledon: “Bautista Agut would be a tough semifinal test for Djokovic”
Wimbledon, Flink: “Djokovic Will Beat Zverev in the Final”
Focus3 days ago
Alexander Zverev Seeks Rest And Improvement After Indian Wells Exit
ATP1 day ago
Filip Krajinovic To Skip Australian Open If Required To Quarantine For More Than Five Days
Hot Topics2 days ago
Nikoloz Basilashvili Puts ‘Small Country’ Georgia On The Map With Historic Run To Indian Wells Final
Latest news3 days ago
Taylor Fritz saves two match points to upset Alexander Zverev in Indian Wells
Focus2 days ago
Indian Wells Daily Preview: The Men’s Semifinals
Hot Topics16 hours ago
Lost Shoes Fails To Stop Cameron Norrie From Becoming First Brit To Win Indian Wells
Focus2 days ago
Daniil Medvedev Withdraws From Moscow
Hot Topics2 days ago
Cameron Norrie Eyes Grand Slam Breakthrough Following Indian Wells Run