Will Billions Of Dollars Revive The Davis Cup? - UBITENNIS
Connect with us


Will Billions Of Dollars Revive The Davis Cup?




The revolutionary idea of the ITF to modernize the Davis Cup is surrounded by many doubts concerning the format and location. While something needs to be done to revive the event, the new proposal is certainly a bizarre one. Will the Davis Cup drown once and for all?


Billions of dollars can sometimes make miracles. 20 million dollars a year for 25 seasons starting from 2019 are undoubtedly a lot of money. Kosmos – the company owned by soccer superstar Gerard Piqué – is the main investor in a new revolutionary project that is supposed to give the Davis Cup a complete makeover. Rakuten – the first Japanese company in the field of e-commerce – would also be one of the investors in the project.

This is not the first time that ITF President David Haggerty is going against the mainstream. Thanks to him, Arthur Ashe Stadium today has a retractable roof, while the majority of the USTA managers were opposing the project. A while ago Haggerty proposed to host the Davis Cup final in a neutral location, but his idea wasn’t approved by the board that is composed of the countries belonging to the International Federation.

With the new project promoted by Piqué, Haggerty is ready to give the Davis Cup either a face-lift or a final knockout blow. If the new “World Cup of Tennis” failed to materialize, Haggerty and the rest of the ITF board will probably put the old Davis Cup to bed once and for all.

Most of the European managers have been quite unimpressed by the proposal so far. It is not surprising that the Brits love their traditions, while the French are still thrilled by their Davis Cup victory last November and the Germans have had some very hostile words towards Haggerty: “Instead of improving the event, they are ruining it. They want to transform it into an exhibition. I truly hope that the member nations will stop this nonsense and remove Haggerty from his presidency,” the Vice President of the German Tennis Federation said.

Spain is probably the only Western European country that will support the project. Plenty of Spanish regions could possibly host the event in an outdoor venue even in late November or early December. That is the reason why Rafa Nadal hasn’t been against the proposal. Murray has seemed favorable as well, while it is obvious that Djokovic – who is one of Kosmos’ stockholders – will surely support the revolution.

In contrast, Roger Federer – who is the mastermind behind the Laver Cup along with his agent Tony Godsick – will certainly not be thrilled by the idea of having his event compete with a newer and more appealing Davis Cup.

The ground-breaking proposal will condense the entire Davis Cup competition into only one week, with 16 nations as part of the World Group plus two wild cards. There will be six groups with three teams each competing in a round-robin format for the first three days of the competition. Each team will be composed of four players and each tie will consist of two singles and one double. All matches will employ a best-of-three format with tie-breakers at 6-6 in each set.

At the end of the first three days, the six teams that win their groups and the two second best teams will advance to the quarterfinals. The semifinals will be contested on Saturday and the final on Sunday. Determining “the two second best teams” will certainly be a puzzle with many complicated calculations in terms of sets and games that were won and lost – perhaps even more complicated than the ATP Finals.

The best teams among the ten that are eliminated in the round-robin stages should play against the eight teams that emerge from World Group II, whose ties will take place in the same three calendar slots that are currently assigned to the “traditional” Davis Cup.

“At the end of the week, we will know the 16 nations that will compete in the final stages of the following year, while we still have to decide how the wild cards will be assigned to teams No. 17 and 18,” Haggerty explained. For example, if the final stages are contested in Qatar, I assume that one of the wild cards will be offered to Qatar.

Even though Dwight Davis was American, the United States are not very attached to certain traditions. U.S. captain Jim Courier doesn’t seem to be against the new format and would also like to add the Fed Cup to the same week. Instead, Yevgeny Kafelnikov of Russia has been utterly against the new format: “It’s terrible, the soul and spirit of the competition will be completely lost,” he said.

Another question mark is the location for the competition, which will require at least 12 show-courts during the round-robin stages. At the moment there are no tennis venues with a big enough capacity to host a world championship of this magnitude, especially by 2019. Certainly, it will have to be an outdoor venue in a location with pleasant weather conditions during the month of November. Most likely Europe will not be an option, perhaps Australia, the Middle East or Asia?

There are certainly more doubts than certainties surrounding the new revolutionary World Cup of Tennis.

(Article translation provided by T&L Global – Translation & Language Solutions –  www.t-lglobal.com )


Laver Back In the Conversation For Greatest Player?

Daniil Medvedev thwarted Djokovic’s Calendar Year Grand Slam ambitions and is ready to take over as the best in the game.




Who’s the greatest player ever?


How about Rod Laver, the owner of two Calendar Grand Slams?

Or what about Rafa Nadal, the owner of 21 major singles titles (including Olympic Gold)?

Or what about 20-20-20-Laver?


Since Novak Djokovic failed in his bid to win a Calendar Grand Slam on Sunday, I nominate the last of the three possibilities. 20-20-20-Laver sounds like a winner.

For Djokovic just to enter the conversation was a major achievement, and that was spurred by the Serbian’s bid for a Calendar Grand Slam.

Daniil Medvedev ended that conversation on Sunday, at least for now, with his straight-set 4-4-4 dismantling of Djokovic in the U.S. Open final.


As 2021 turned out, it was a really disappointing year for Djokovic, even though he won the year’s first three Grand Slam events. Most players would be out celebrating if they won three Grand Slams in one year.

The loss to Alexander Zverev in the Tokyo Olympics ended Novak’s Golden Grand Slam. And then Medvedev took care of the Calendar Grand Slam talk and the possibility of Djokovic breaking a 20-20-20 deadlock with Nadal and Roger Federer.

So, what’s next? I doubt that Novak is planning to skip the Australian Open in January. Even that one won’t be easy for Djokovic as a result of what has happened in late summer.


Djokovic has practically owned the Australian Open with nine titles in Melbourne, and eight of the last 11. But Medvedev and Zverev will be major obstacles for Djokovic in Melbourne, along with Stefanos Tsitsipas.

The Australian Open isn’t likely to be a picnic for Novak, even if Federer and Nadal skip the trip. If so, Federer and Nadal will be leaving the Australian Open in capable hands.

Things should start heating up by the quarterfinals Down Under.

By the way, Djokovic is 34 years old. That’s about the age Nadal started having trouble winning Grand Slams.


Medvedev beat Djokovic at just about everything he tried on Sunday. Djokovic was never in the game on serving competition or powerful forehands.

Those areas belonged to the 25-year-old Russian.

And movement? On this day, Medvedev had a picnic. The 6-6 first-time Grand Slam winner was everywhere with his amazing quickness. Djokovic couldn’t put a dent in his baseline defense.

Medvedev even out-did Djokovic in the Serbian’s usually solid drop shot department, pinning  even more disappointment on Novak.

Novak even caused a ball girl to change directions during the match as he swung his racket near the surface in  frustration after losing a point. Later, he punished his racket by smashing it into the court and destroying it.


The key to the relatively easy win for Medvedev was his serve. He was a perfect 15-for-15 on first-serve points in the opening set.

Medvedev obviously had little trouble with his serve until he was ready to end the match. With Medvedev owning a match point at 5-2 in the third set, the crowd tried to help Djokovic. Only then when the crowd got into the act of trying to break Medvedev’s attention did he double-fault twice in a row before netting a forehand to give Djokovic the game.

But in the final game of the match, Medvedev was ready for the crowd attack, although he double-faulted another match point away before ending the match with a big serve out wide for a 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 victory. Djokovic managed only to hit the bottom of the net with his backhand return.

And suddenly, the tall Russian looks like the best player in the game.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com

Continue Reading


Raducanu Proved She’s The Better Player

The British sensation shocked the tennis world – can she keep it up in the coming years?




They played in the largest tennis stadium in the world.


They were teenagers. They achieved a dream early in their careers.

It just as easily could have been a junior championship a year earlier in their careers.

Only a few people would have been watching then. Such an event might not even have drawn newspaper coverage.


This meeting was much bigger and more important. The two participants would be $2.7 million richer between them before the day ended. They would become famous the world over, at least for now.

But this was Saturday, 9/11/21.

Real life now sets in. There probably are at least 100 other players in the world who are just as outstanding as Emma Raducanu and Leylah Fernandez. Yet, most of them will never be involved in a Grand Slam singles final.


What Raducanu and Fernandez accomplished will never be forgotten, always listed in tennis annals.

England will always be proud of its new Grand Slam champion. At long last, Virginia Wade has company.

And Canada will never forget its feisty Grand Slam runner-up.

They stood the test while other more touted and talented players buckled at the knees. High-ranked players crumbled at the thought of losing to a mere teenager.

Next time, that advantage probably won’t exist.


Raducanu and Fernandez played the final like the teenagers they are.

Raducanu came close to making it a one-sided result when she held match point twice with a 5-2 lead in the second set. But Fernandez did not give up on her left-handed game that Raducanu had conquered before in the junior ranks.

After losing both points and the game to make the match closer, Raducanu fought off a pair of break points in the next game before making good on her third match point for a 6-4, 6-3 victory.

The British 18-year-old generally outplayed the 19-year-old Fernandez most of the 111-minute final. Raducanu had more firepower on her serve and ground strokes.


Raducanu played like a tour veteran, even if it was only her fourth tour-level event. It was her 10th straight win without dropping a set, counting her three wins in qualifying just to get into the main draw. No women’s qualifier before even had advanced to a Grand Slam final.

She has the game to win consistently on the tour, but probably not strong enough to challenge the Top 10 players and Grand Slam titlists right away. She’s now no longer under the radar. Everyone wants to beat a Grand Slam champion.

This may have been just a one-shot opening that Raducanu took full advantage of to win a Grand Slam title.  Just in case the road ahead gets bumpy, she might want to be thrifty with the $1.8 million payday.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com

Continue Reading


Novak Djokovic Was Pushed To An Amazing Performance

Zverev fell just short of beating the world N.1, and now Medvedev is the last obstacle still standing on his path to a Calendar Year Grand Slam




Novak Djokovic was simply amazing Friday night.


True, he made a few mistakes against Alexander Zverev, but not when they counted most.

Zverev also was superb, but his mistakes came when they counted really big.

For those reasons, Djokovic is getting ready to play for the unthinkable. No one had thought much about a Calendar Grand Slam until back in June when Djokovic shocked the tennis world with a victory over Rafa Nadal at the French Open.

By the time Wimbledon came around without Roger Federer and Nadal in the field, the odds were high that Djokovic actually could achieve a Calendar Grand Slam. And then he won Wimbledon and in the process turned the race for most Grand Slam titles into a 20-20-20 battle.


When Federer and Nadal pulled out of the U.S. Open, all of Djokovic’s goals except a Golden Grand Slam when he lost to Zverev at the Olympics were in play.

Nearly two weeks later, Djokovic is one victory away from breaking out of the 20-20-20 deadlock as well as completing a rare Calendar Grand Slam.

Zverev pressed Djokovic into playing his very best to escape with a 4-6, 6-2, 6-4, 4-6, 6-2 victory in the U.S. Open semifinals. Only a cold start to the fifth set chilled Zverev’s hopes of spoiling Novak’s dreams.

Even after losing the first five games of the fifth set, Zverev still came close to making things interesting by winning the next two games and going to 30-30 in the eighth game.


Zverev’s improving game, and his big strokes and serves probably were enough to make Novak hope he won’t have to face Zverev’s hard balls again in January at the Australian Open.

That leaves only Daniil Medvedev between Djokovic and immortality.

Medvedev will have to be at his best to beat Novak. The slender 6-6 Russian can’t afford even a brief meltdown if he is to take Djokovic to the wire.

Medvedev appeared to be in awe of Djokovic when the two met in  this year’s Australian Open final.  Djokovic won that one easily in straight sets.


Medvedev’s game is a piece of work. He is completely unpredictable.

His whip forehand is one of the best shots in tennis. He backs it up with incredible movement.

It all depends on whether Medvedev can stick with Novak until the end. If Medvedev is still there, Novak likely will feel the heavy legs from his 214-minute bout with Zverev.

Not even Djokovic can out-move Medvedev. And the Russian’s uniquely quick serve has plenty of pop. He is due to win a Grand Slam.

But Medvedev will have to pull off a miracle against one of the smartest and slyest players tennis has ever seen if he is to win this U.S. Open.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award as the tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspapers. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com

Continue Reading