Should the Grand Slam Reciprocal Wildcard Agreement be scrapped? - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Comments

Should the Grand Slam Reciprocal Wildcard Agreement be scrapped?

Avatar

Published

on

The Australian Open is the next Grand Slam, with Roger Federer the defending champion (Zimbio.com)

This week the Grands Slam Board announced a number of revolutionary changes that will change tennis at the sport’s biggest events. Changes including a shot clock, and shorter on court warm-ups have been made.

 

Yet has the GSB missed a trick in all this change? 

For years three of the four Grand Slams have engaged in the Reciprocal Wildcard Agreement. This Agreement sees wildcard places at the Grand Slam events exchanged between three out of the four host nations. For example, at the upcoming Australian Open, Tim Smyczek has won the wildcard through his results on the Challenger circuit, the way the United States Tennis Association awards its coveted prize. France will announce the recipient of theirs at an appropriate time, and Australia will then benefit with a wildcard at each of the French and US Opens respectively.

The key question is, should this Agreement exist at all? 

Proponents of the agreement might suggest that it helps develop stronger relationships and firmer ties between the Grand Slams. Others might suggest that it reflects the contribution to tennis history that these nations have made. However, this doesn’t really seem to be a good enough reason to dole out a coveted position in the main draw of a Grand Slam.

Indeed, the Agreement seems almost an unnecessary monopoly by some of the biggest nations in tennis. Considering that these nations have a natural tendency to offer the majority of the wildcards at their event to home players, it seems strange that they should be afforded the luxury of yet another wildcard at other slams. Being awarded a wildcard should be an honour, a reflection of great talent or proven ability, as these are the only real reasons that could possibly justify handing out a coveted place at a grand slam.

Wimbledon has in the past seemed better in its decision-making. Until 2015 the tournament usually did not offer wildcards to home players unless they met stringent criteria, including a ranking of inside the Top 250 of the ATP/WTA rankings. It was changed to reflect the fact that Wimbledon views an upcoming generation of British players worthy of chances in the future. The principle was very sound, even fair. Wimbledon is also the only Grand Slam to not currently partake in the Reciprocal Agreement.

If the GSB board was to scrap the Agreement, what could take its place?

There are a number of ideas about how the wildcard could be better, and more fairly, used. One idea could be to follow the line taken by the Olympic Games. These tournaments reserve wildcards for smaller, nations that have less funding, access to funding, or local tournaments to benefit their players. This principle saw Slovakia’s Andrej Martin, Bosnia Hrzegovina’s Mirza Basic, Moldova’s Radu Albot, and the Bahama’s Darian King all receive wildcards after their pre-tournament rankings failed to gain them entry.

It seemed to pay off, as both Albot and Martin progressed past the first round, with Martin making it to round three. Yet progression is not necessarily the overall point, (though it would give weight to the decision if the individual progressed.) The point is that these wildcards make tennis far more inclusive. We might not expect a player from Kazakhstan, Panama, or Vietnam to win a grand slam but it would be a great move in the game today to see players from such nations afforded a rare piece of luck that so rarely comes their way compared to others. Of course, the player who is to be the recipient of such a wildcard must have a strong professional tennis ability, so a prerequisite criteria of a ranking inside the Top 300 would be sensible.

Denis Istomin won the Asia-Pacific Play-Off to feature in the Australian Open last year. He would go on to knock out the defending champion and reach the Round of 16 (Zimbio.com)

There seems to be a attempt to install something like this in tennis at present. The Australian Open hosts an Asia-Pacific Play-Off where sixteen players (excluding Australians) partake in a tournament with the winner earning a wildcard for the main draw of the Australian Open.  It is worth mentioning that the winner for the 2017 wildcard was none other than Uzbekistan’s Denis Istomin, who would go on to stun defending champion Novak Djokovic in the second round on his way to an eventual fourth round run.

Yet the Australian Open seems to be the only tournament at present that explores this at present. In an age where tennis seems to be all about change, one of the most glaring issues stepped in recent tennis history seems to be surviving for no discernible reason.

 

 

Comments

It’s Unfair, Rafa Is Too Good In Roland Garros Final

James Beck reflects on Nadal’s latest triumph at Roland Garros.

Avatar

Published

on

Rafael Nadal - Roland Garros 2022 (foto Roberto Dell'Olivo)

This one was almost unfair.

 

It was like Rafa Nadal giving lessons to one of his former students at the Nadal academy back home in Mallorca.

When this French Open men’s singles final was over in less than two hours and a half, Rafa celebrated, of course. But he didn’t even execute his usual championship ritual on Court Philippe Chatrier of falling on his back on the red clay all sprawled out.

This one was that easy for the 36-year-old Spanish left-hander. He yielded only six games.

 It certainly didn’t have the characteristics of his many battles at Roland Garros with Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer.

It must have been a bit shocking to the packed house of mostly Rafa fans.

RAFA DIDN’T MISS ‘HIS SHOT’ OFTEN

Nadal didn’t miss many of his patented shots such as his famed reverse cross-court forehand. He was awesome at times. Young 23-year-old Casper Ruud must have realized that by the middle of the second set when Rafa started on his amazing 11-game winning streak to finish off a 6-3, 6-3, 6-0 victory.

Ruud is good. The Norway native will win his share of ATP titles, but probably not many Grand Slam titles. If any, at least until Rafa goes away to a retirement, certainly on his island of Mallorca.

Rafa already has his own statue on the grounds of Roland Garros. Perhaps, Mallorca should be renamed Rafa Island.

RUUD COULDN’T HANDLE RAFA’S PRESSURE

Ruud displayed a great forehand at times to an open court. But when Rafa applied his usual pressure to the corners Ruud’s forehand often  went haywire.

Rafa’s domination started to show in the third set as Ruud stopped chasing Nadal’s wicked reverse cross-court forehands. 

Ruud simply surrendered the last three games while Nadal yielded only three points. Nadal finished it off with a sizzling backhand down the line. In the end, nice guy, good sport and former student Ruud could only congratulate Rafa.

JOHNNY MAC: RAFA ‘INSANELY GOOD’

The great John McEnroe even called Nadal’s overall perfection “insanely good.”

If Iga Swiatek’s 6-1, 6-3 win in Saturday’s women’s final over young Coco Gauff was a mismatch,  Iga’s tennis idol staged a complete domination of Ruud a day later.

It appears that the only thing that can slow Rafa down is his nearly always sore left foot, not his age. He won his first French Open final 17 years ago.

For Nadal to win a 22nd Grand Slam title to take a 22-20-20 lead over his friends and rivals Djokovic and Federer is mind-boggling, but not as virtually unbelievable as winning a 14th  French Open title.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award for print media. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. 

Continue Reading

Comments

At The French Open Rafa and Novak Lived Up To A Battle For The Ages

Avatar

Published

on

Rafael Nadal (photo @RolandGarros)

Rafa Nadal is simply amazing.

 

His herd of fans couldn’t have been more pleased with their hero on this day just hours from his 36th birthday. He was never better, his patented reverse  cross-court forehand a marvel for the ages and his serve never more accurate.

The presence of his long-time friend and rival on the Court Philippe Chatrier that he loves so much made Nadal’s victory over Novak Djokovic even more special. The 59th meeting between these two warriors was a match for the ages, marvelous play by both players. Some games seemed to go on forever, with these two legends of the game dueling for every point for nearly four hours in a match that started in May and ended in June.

NADAL HAS NEVER PLAYED BETTER

The 6-2, 4-6, 6-2, 7-6 (4) victory sends Nadal into his birthday on Friday to face Alexander Zverev for a spot in Sunday’s final of the French Open. Win or lose now, Rafa will remain the all-time leader in Grand Slam singles titles until at least Wimbledon due to his current 21-20-20 edge over Djokovic and Roger Federer.

Nadal played like he could go on forever playing his game, but he is quick to remind that his career could end at any time. The always painful left foot remains in his mind.

But the Spanish left-hander has never played better than when he overcame a 5-2 deficit against Djokovic in the fourth set. Nadal sparkled with energy, easily holding service, then fighting off two set points with true grit, holding easily to get back to 5-5 and then holding serve at love for 6-6.

A 6-1 TIEBREAKER DEFICIT TOO MUCH FOR EVEN NOVAK

The tiebreaker belonged to Rafa for six of the first seven points. That was too tough a task for even Novak to overcome.

Rafa’s podiatrist must have felt relieved at least for now. If Rafa was in pain, he didn’t show it for the first time in quite awhile.

If Nadal could pull off the feat of taming the big game and serving accuracy Zverev displayed while conquering potential whiz kid Carlos Alcaraz, and then taking out whoever is left in the battle between Denmark’s young Holger Rune, Croatia’s veteran Marin Cilic, Norway’s Casper Ruud and Russian Andrey Rublev, Nadal might own a nearly unbeatable lead with 22 Grand Slam titles.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award for print media. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. 

Continue Reading

Comments

The Next Group Of Hopefuls To Replace The ‘Great Trio’ May Be Beaten Out By Youth

Avatar

Published

on

Carlos Alcaraz - Roland Garros 2022 (photo Roberto Dell'Olivo)

What is it with this supposedly great crop of newer and younger players groomed to take the places of the “Great Trio” of  Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal and Novak Djokovic at the top of the men’s game?

 

Only Daniil Medvedev and Dominic Thiem have won Grand Slam titles, both at the U.S. Open. And that’s about it. Medvedev just fell to Marin Cilic in the French Open round of 16.

Who?

You remember the 33-year-old hard-hitting Croatian who won the 2014 U.S. Open. Cilic had hardly been heard from since the 2018 Australian Open where he was runner-up . . . until  Monday when he needed just 45 minutes to conquer Medvedev.

THIEM JUST ANOTHER PLAYER THESE DAYS

Thiem? He looked like the real deal in 2020 when he won the U.S. Open. The Austrian is now 28 years old and an injured right wrist in 2021 has pushed Thiem far down the ATP rankings.

Then, there was the next presumed superstar: Stefanos Tsitsipas. The aggressive potential superstar came up empty on Monday against a virtually unknown teenager. Holger Rune was fantastic in his four-set domination of Tsitsipas.

The just-turned 19-year-old Rune appears to have it all: speed, quickness, power and touch. A 40th ranking isn’t too bad for a teen-ager, especially when it will zoom higher as the result of his advancement to a Grand Slam quarterfinal.

ARE MEDVEDEV, THIEM AND TSITSIPAS REALLY THAT GREAT?

Maybe Medvedev, Thiem and Tsitsipas aren’t really as good as they once appeared to be. They are certainly not in the category of all-time greats. They have had their chances to become household words.

Maybe the members of this group weren’t meant to be the superstars to replace Federer, Nadal and Djokovic as fan favorites.

Maybe, it’s the next group of younger players, even teenagers. Yes, it appears that Carlos Alcaraz may outshine the likes of Thiem, Medvedev and Tsitsipas in the next few years.

MAKE WAY FOR CARLOS ALCARAZ?

It just happens the 19-year-old Carlos Alcaraz may become one of the eventual replacements for Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.

Carlos Alcaraz is one week younger than Rune.

Alexander Zverev might have been ahead of the others if he hadn’t blown so many chances for stardom the last few years. Still, he is the Olympic champion and probably has more potential than Thiem, Medvedev or Tsitsipas.

A HERD OF PLAYERS WAITING TO MAKE THEIR MARKS

There is a herd of virtually unknown players waiting to make their mark. For instance, take Casper Ruud, 20-year-old Jannik Skinner and Matteo Berrettini. They have the potential to beat anyone.

But Alcaraz and Rune look like the best of the new young guns of tennis.

Of course, it really doesn’t matter who wins the Nadal-Djokovic quarterfinal showdown in Paris. They are two of the greatest players ever. Nothing is going to change that, not in Paris or anywhere else. Their place in history is written in stone, alongside Federer.

WOMEN’S GAME UNPREDICTABLE

The women’s game is even more unpredictable than the men’s game. One reason is because the WTA no longer has superstars the likes of Venus and Serena Williams, and Ashleigh Barty.

Top-ranked Iga Swiatek looked ready to take over the women’s game with her long string of consecutive wins. But in the last two rounds of the French Open, Swiatek has looked like just another good player at times.

That may be due to the fact that the Polish sensation is going for her second French Open title while taking a 31-match winning streak into the quarterfinals. But it happened in the third round against 95th-ranked Danka Kovinic and then again Monday in round of 16 against 74th-ranked Qinwen Zheng.

Swiatek suddenly looked very average, but then bounced back to take both matches in the cool weather once she put on a white jacket in each match. She aroused her game early enough to avoid losing a set against Kovinic, but not against Zheng.

PEGULA MAY TEST SWIATEK

Swiatek now will face newlywed Jessie Pegula in the quarterfinals. Pegula is now playing the best tennis of her career and has rocketed to No. 11 in the world. Like Swiatek, Pegula is a fighter. She won’t go down easily and may be Swiatek’s toughest test remaining in Paris.

The 28-year-old Pegula called Charleston her home while she trained for a couple of years at the then Family Circle Cup complex, which is now the home of the Credit One Charleston Open stop on the WTA Tour. Pegula was married in last October at the famed Biltmore Estate in Asheville, N.C.

Pegula also is having doubles success in Paris. She teamed with Coco Gauff to reach the third round in doubles, hoping for a victory there to advance to the doubles quarterfinals as well.

James Beck was the 2003 winner of the USTA National Media Award for print media. A 1995 MBA graduate of The Citadel, he can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending