The ATP Q4 Report Card - UBITENNIS
Connect with us


The ATP Q4 Report Card



Co-GOAT contenders Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer combined to dominate the 2017 season. Just as the debate rages on regarding which is the GOAT, the same debate exists regarding which had the better year. Who is the true ATP Player of the Year? Let’s compare their 2017 resumes, and also look at other notable performers from Q4 and the full year.


Rafael Nadal

  • 10,645 points
  • 67-11 match record (.859 winning percentage)
  • 6 titles overall, including 2 majors (Roland Garros, US Open, Monte-Carlo Masters, Madrid Masters, Barcelona, Beijing)
  • 13 weeks ranked #1 (as of today)

Analysis: After missing significant portions of 2016 due to injury, Nadal came roaring back to have his best season in four years. He reasserted his dominance on the clay, winning the tournaments in Monte-Carlo and Barcelona for the tenth time in his career, respectively. Rafa then won his tenth French Open, which was his first major title in three years. He followed that up with another major win in New York. Nadal spent the last three months of the season back at the number one ranking.

Roger Federer

Embed from Getty Images

  • 9,605 points
  • 52-5 match record (.912 winning percentage)
  • 7 titles overall, including 2 majors (Australian Open, Wimbledon, Indian Wells Masters, Miami Masters, Shanghai Masters, Halle, Basel)

Analysis: Much like Nadal, Federer returned from an injury-plagued 2016 to dominate the competition in 2017. In his first tournament in six months, Roger shocked the tennis world by defeating four top 10 seeds in Melbourne on his way to winning his first major since 2012. This included an epic five-set victory over his rival Nadal, where he came back from being down a break in the fifth set. Federer would go 4-0 against Nadal in 2017, a significant turn in a rivalry Nadal has dominated in the past. Roger won a tour-leading seven titles on the year, amassing his best winning percentage in over a decade. He won his ninth career title in Halle, before taking his eighth career title at Wimbledon.

Nadal or Federer: Who is the true Player of the Year?

Federer’s 4-0 record against Nadal this year is a significant consideration, as is his total of only five losses on the year. But also significant is Federer’s decision to sit out the entire clay court season. If they had met on clay, Rafa likely would have gotten the better of Roger. You could argue Federer may have ended the year ranked number one had he played the clay season, as he ended the year only 1,000 points behind Nadal. However, you could also argue Federer would not have done as well in the second half of the season had he not rested in April and May. And while Roger had a better winning percentage, Nadal had 15 more wins on the year, and deserves consideration for playing the entire season.

If Roger had won the ATP Finals this past weekend, I was ready to consider him as the better player this year. That would have given him the most prestigious title outside of the majors. It would also have given him 900 more rankings points, putting him just 140 points behind Rafa. Without that title, there’s not enough evidence to support bumping him up passed Nadal, who should be considered the ATP Player of the Year.

Best of the Rest in Q4:

Grigor Dimitrov

Embed from Getty Images

  • 5,150 points
  • 49-19 match record
  • 4 titles (ATP Finals, Cincinnati Masters, Brisbane, Sofia)

Analysis: Dimitrov had a roller coaster year of high and lows, but it was by far his strongest season to date. He won four titles in 2017, including his first Masters 1,000 tournament. He ended the year with his biggest title yet, going 5-0 at the ATP Finals and reaching a career-high ranking of number three. Grigor started the year just as impressively, beating three top eight players in winning the title in Brisbane. A few weeks later, he played one of the best matches of the year, narrowing going down in defeat to Nadal in a five-hour Australian Open semifinal. Will this year be a peak year for Dimitrov, or is this the start of bigger things for Grigor? Following these career highs, I expect Grigor to struggle a bit in the immediate future.

David Goffin

Embed from Getty Images

  • 3,775 points
  • 57-24 match record
  • 2 titles (Tokyo and Shenzhen)

Analysis: Goffin ended the year strongly, defeating both Nadal and Federer on his way to the championship match at the ATP Finals. He now sits at a career-high number seven, and his year is not quite done yet: he will represent Belgium in the Davis Cup final against France this weekend. His ranking could easily be even higher had he not suffered a freak injury at Roland Garros which forced him to retire from that tournament as well as miss the entire grass court season. I look for Goffin to remain a fixture in the top 10 in 2018.

Jack Sock

Embed from Getty Images

  • 3,165 points
  • 38-21 match record
  • 3 titles (Paris Masters, Auckland, Delray Beach)

Analysis: Jack Sock came out of nowhere and took advantage of a wide open draw in Paris to win his first Masters 1,000 title, which qualified him for the ATP Finals on the last possible day. He also impressed in London, defeating Marin Cilic and Alexander Zverev along the way before losing in the semifinals to Dimitrov. Sock had a great start to 2017 as well, with two titles and strong performances in Indian Wells and Miami. It’s the middle of the season where Sock struggled, going just 13-15 over a seven-month stretch. Can Sock find more consistency in 2018? And how will he react to the new expectations that come with being ranked in the top eight? I would not be surprised to Sock’s level drop off early in 2018.

Juan Martin Del Potro

Embed from Getty Images

  • 2,595 points
  • 38-16 match record
  • 1 title (Stockholm)
  • US Open Semifinalist

Analysis: Following the US Open, Del Potro continued his momentum throughout the fall. Juan Martin went 15-4 in Q4, including a semifinal run at the Shanghai Masters and winning his first title since 52 weeks prior in Stockholm. Unlike Sock, who may be playing a level of tennis that will be hard for him to sustain, this felt more like a return to form for Del Potro. I expect Juan Martin to return to the top 10 in 2018, and to be a significant factor at the big tournaments. Let’s hope the Argentine remains healthy throughout the year.

2017 Honorable Mentions

Embed from Getty Images
Alexander Zverev came into his own in 2017, winning five titles and ending the year ranked number four. However, he did not end the year well, with a 7-6 record in Q4. This could be the beginning of the infamous sophomore slump for Zverev, where players suffer in form during the second year of prominence. Similarly, Dominic Thiem had a strong first half of the year, but severely dropped off in the second half. While he finished the year in the top five, the Austrian had an abysmal 3-6 record in Q4. However I see Thiem finding his way again in the new year. Marin Cilic had one of the strongest seasons of his career, highlighted by reaching his second major final. That being said, he appeared to struggle with his nerve as the year progressed, and was the only player to go 0-3 at the ATP Finals. It may be challenging for Cilic in 2018 to maintain his 2017 level.

2018 Scouting Report

Last year’s top five players (Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray, Stan Wawrinka, Kei Nishikori, and Milos Raonic) are all expected to be back playing full-time. Will these former champions return to glory in 2018 just as Nadal and Federer did in 2017? All spent the latter parts of this year dealing with injuries, and many of them are also dealing with changes to their coaching teams. I would expect it will take some time for most of them to get back into top form. And which players who stepped up in their absence will maintain their results upon the return of so many top names? Will 2018 finally be the year we see a player born in the 1990’s win a major title? And then of course there’s Nadal and Federer. It seems unrealistic for them to dominate as they did in 2017, but can they stay healthy and add to their major title tallies? With this mix of generations competing against one another, 2018 should be another fascinating year on the ATP tour.

Continue Reading
Click to comment


Why It Is Right To Criticise Novak Djokovic Over His Chat With Chervin Jafarieh

The world No.1 is entitled to his beliefs, but there is a fine line.



Novak Djokovic is undoubtedly one of the greatest tennis players of all time given his record-breaking career that has seen him claim 17 grand slam titles and win more prize money than any other player in history. He is an idol of thousands and is one of the most influential people in Serbia. The position is a great honour, but it is also one that places him under strict scrutiny at times.


This scrutiny opens him up for criticism. Just earlier this week he posted a video on his Instagram account of him training at a facility in Mallorca. Prompting accusations that he broke lockdown rules before it was later confirmed that the mistake lied with the owners of the venue. It could be argued that Djokovic gets a more hostile reception from the tennis community compared to his rivals Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Just look at last year’s Wimbledon final. With all of this in mind, there is fresh uproar over a recent chat he held and quite rightly so.

The world No.1 recently held a discussion with Chervin Jafarieh, who is known for his holistic approach to health. The purpose of their Instagram Live talk was to explain what Djokovic describes as the ‘natural detoxification process of the body.’ During one part of their discussion, they touched on the belief that the molecular structure of water can be changed by simply meditating or thinking. Basically, if you have bad thoughts, it will make bad water.

“I know some people that, through energetical transformation, through the power of prayer, through the power of gratitude, they managed to turn the most toxic food, or maybe most polluted water into the most healing water, because water reacts. Scientists have proven that in experiment, that molecules in the water react to our emotions to what has been said,” Djokovic said.
“I truly believe that we should continuously every single day remind ourselves when we sit, that we sit without cameras, without phones, without watching things and stuff. Or even worse, having nervous [and] conflicting discussions at the table with your close ones during your meal.”

The concept is based on research conducted by pseudo-scientist Masaru Emoto. However, the reason why Djokovic has come under fire for endorsing this view is because of the many questions surrounding it. First of all, it lacks scientific validity. In one article written by professor William Reville, he points out that Emoto was never a scientist (he was a doctor of alternative medicine) and conducted a triple blind study that actually disproved this theory which Djokovic has publicly promoted. Furthermore, EU-funded Germany water company, says mainstream science has been unable to replicate Emoto’s findings because of the ‘unspecified techniques” used. It is also interesting to note that Emoto was offered to take part in the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge where he could prove his theory but declined.

Of course, people have their own beliefs and should never be criticised for them. Although Djokovic finds himself in a tough box. Due to his status, he has the ability to inspire and influence many. A lot of which he has already done for the good with his love and respect for everybody.

But in this case he should be held to account for giving such a high profile platform to Jafarieh. A person who has minimal information online.

Jafarieh is the mastermind behind wellness brand CYMBIOTIKA, which is a leading dietary supplement that is known for ‘creating pure, clinically-backed supplements.’ Looking at the website, it may appeal to many for numerous reasons. The products are said to help reduce anxiety, boost your immune system and calms the central nervous system. This sounds like a bunch of great products until you do look beneath the surface.

“We are not responsible if information made available on this site is not accurate, complete or current. The material on this website is provided for general information only and should not be relied upon or used as the sole basis for making decisions without consulting primary, more accurate, more complete or more timely sources of information.” The terms and conditions of the website read.

Researching further the Frequently Asked Questions of the CYMBIOTIKA website states that ‘results are not guaranteed.’

Despite these issues, there will likely be a surge of interest around these products. After all, if a top athlete like Djokovic has been taking similar health remedies, it must have positive effects? A perfectly justifiable reasoning, but also one that shows Djokovic’s responsibility concerning these matters.

It is not for me to say what he should or shouldn’t express. Djokovic is renowned for his mental strength on the court and standing up for what he believes in. As Mary Carillo from The Tennis Channel notes he is not one who doesn’t like change.

“It’s not a surprise Novak speaks in these ways. This I find particularly dangerous. He’s not the kind of guy whose favourite music changes in every room he moves in… I’m very disturbed that Djokovic and that other guy are saying you can change toxic water to drinking water.” She said.

Djokovic is a sporting icon and nothing changes that. His controversial chat has already gained more than 500,00 views and not necessarily all of it was bad. However, to give a platform to somebody who sells questionable products is one that should be concerning. After all, if they were perfectly fine, why would the company advise the public to look at other sources of information beforehand?

This is why I think it is right to criticise Djokovic.

Continue Reading


Of Novak Djokovic, A Champion And Above All A Great Man

The Serbian donated one million euros to the hospitals in Bergamo, and did so without publicity. This is a great example of the great person he is, despite the crowd abuse he had to endure at Wimbledon against Federer. His authenticity has always been there, all the way since those Players Parties in Monte Carlo.



Novak Djokovic did something amazing, and the unprompted nature of his act did all but magnify his gallantry.


I’ve met him a few times, for instance when I was invited to the Players Party in Monte Carlo as either a comedic advisor or even as an actor, and I have to say that, whether one can like his brand of tennis which is – perfunctory to say – extraordinary, to be able to witness the charm, the spontaneity, and the effort he put in his duties as dancer, singer, and all-around showman, reinforced my first impression of him as a genuinely decent guy, not a conceited persona. This is why I always thought the attitude of the crowd during the last Wimbledon final against Federer to be utterly disgraceful to say the least. It’s one thing to choose a champion to cheer for, and another to disrespect his opponent, to the point of taking away from him the joys of victory and celebration. And as a matter of fact, Nole barely acknowledged his success. Sure, he will have thoroughly enjoyed it in his heart, but some bitterness must have crept in – and this is just unfair.

Many have said that Novak is constantly hurt by the greater popularity of Federer and Nadal, who had a head start in seizing the love of tennis fans, and then could live off it as with a trust fund. I don’t think Nole is jealous of his rivals. However, it is only human that he wishes for his humane side to be acknowledged a little more, as it happens in Serbia, where he is second to none in the estimation of his people. This happens in Italy as well, for the most part, thanks to his fluency in the language that allows him to fully be himself wherever he goes, be it in stand-up comedy skits, at music festivals, or simply among the crowd. When he says that Italy is his second home, he says it sincerely, and that is true for his wife Jelena too, since she studied in Milan. When he says it, he’s not pandering to Roger and Rafa’s fans, he knows that they won’t switch sides. He has no obligation to say it, he does because he means it. Every single tournament winner thanks the organisers and the crowd, claiming that it’s the best event that could possibly be, we know it, it’s part of the game. But Djokovic, who loves Rome and its tournament, and is loved by the city in return, doesn’t mince words when he says that some things could and should be improved, especially in terms of court maintenance – his honesty should be appreciated.

We should also be more accepting of the diplomacy that his political role in the ATP Council entails at times, leading him to leave some questions unanswered. I don’t always agree with what Novak says, such as during the Gimelstob affair, at least initially. At the same time, though, it can’t be easy for a man in his position to pick a side during a quarrel like the one happening between the ATP Cup (backed by Tennis Australia) and the Davis Cup, a competition he has an unbreakable bond with, because of what it meant for him and for Serbia when they won it in 2010, changing the trajectory of his career for good, and for the better.

He’s stated publicly that he’s in favour of the creation of a single team event, but he knows very well that the interests at stake – involving multi-year contracts signed by Tennis Australia on one side, and by the ITF, Piqué, and Rakuten on the other – are not easily reconcilable, and thus he knows very well that his statement might sound hypocritical or utopian. However, being a “politician” of tennis, he’s aware that what he said is what the fans who do not have any economic agendas wish for, namely one competition that wouldn’t betray too much the storied past of the Davis Cup.

Well, I got caught up in the writing as usual, even if I was doing it on my phone with the idea of putting on paper just a couple lines (!) to commend Novak on his incredible gesture, and this is even more noticeable since I can only use one finger while writing on my phone (my children write at supersonic speed, and I have no idea how). All I wanted to do was to thank Novak Djokovic for being such a great champion, and even more for being such a great man. All that’s left to say is… NOT TOO BAD! To Nole,


P.S. I’ll always regret missing the chance to play with him in Australia, when he told me, “Bring your racquet tomorrow!” Just one minute of that heinous spectacle of personal embarrassment would have been enough for me to be contented with myself! Alas, the temperature reached 40 degrees and the humidity was such that all outdoors play was suspended, and naturally I had no way to get onto the indoors ones between matches. That night Nole all but apologized and said: “We’ll do it in Rome then!”

Article translated from by Tommaso Villa

Continue Reading


Tennis In The Time Of Covid-19

There will be tennis again, but along the way there should be memories of triumphs that rise above the challenges that these times engender. Existence can hinge on more than tennis, but the game will survive a pandemic with a lot of patience and ingenuity.




By Cheryl Jones

It’s April. Tennis hasn’t been cancelled, but it’s been sidelined by something much bigger than the sport itself. The Covid-19 virus has taken center stage. It’s doubtful that Rafael Nadal will be taking his yearly bite out of the Coupe des Mousquetaires, even though Roland Garros has merely been rescheduled for September. Paris’ delay could eventually lead to cancellation, gauging the way things are now. Roger Federer is likely having mixed feelings about the cancellation of most major events that he was planning to skip anyway, having had knee surgery quite recently. Andy Murray has probably been weighing the events of the day, trying to decide if he should retire and become an expert on the rare species of bats that have taken up residence on his property – or maybe not.


There’s a likelihood that the stars of the tennis world are doing just what everyone else is doing – sheltering in place, reading that book that’s been on the shelf gathering dust, or maybe like Federer trying to hit balls against a wall to get back into condition. Of course it is snowing and windy and cold in Switzerland this time of year, but as Chaucer once said – time waits for no man. Evidently, not even Roger Federer.

Having a good deal of time on my hands, having read three of those dusty books and missing tennis, my mind began to wander. I thought about others that were confined to their homes, much as I am here in Southern California. Because this was a rather unplanned sequestering, most folks have had to make-do with what they have on hand.

Last week, ESPN, hungry for sports news, where thanks to the virus, none exists, showed Federer hitting balls against a backboard on his private court. I imagined that he had to make sure there were no gut strings involved that would grow gummy in the wet and wild weather. Then I thought, what if his supply of synthetic strings ran low? A crafty guy like Federer would have something on hand. He would have known that he needed to rehab and there should have been a way to make that happen. What better way to get in shape for tennis than with tennis?

I imagined that he called his good friend Rafa and the two of them surely would have chatted about the dilemma Roger was having. He needed to rehab, but he had way too much gut and not enough synthetic string. As problems go, this should have been inconsequential, in the scheme of things, but it wasn’t. They both knew that their livelihood should not depend on the lack of suitable manmade product. The chitchat that the two greats exchanged would have been light and airy – How are the kids? How about the newlyweds? How’s the fishing going? Kids are fine; marriage is fine; fishing isn’t what it once was, but life is good. Wait – fishing… Rafa might have remembered that he left a tackle box in Roger’s huge garage. Recalling the contents, he would have said, “Check the stash of fishing line, No?”

A glimmer of hope would have painted a smile on Roger’s face and off he would go to check the garage for the tackle box. Looking in every crevice of the space that was carefully catalogued and organized for convenience, he might finally have spotted the box. It was filled with hooks and lures. Not much in the way of fishing line, but when he moved the top drawer, there under it all, was a supply of fishing line. It would have been cold out there. Roger would have stuffed his pockets with spools of various test weights. (Fishing line is gauged by the size of fish it could be strong enough to reel in.)

He would have jogged back into the house, thrilled with his find. After all, the sporting goods stores were all on hiatus because the places had been declared non-essential businesses. The thought of that had left him muttering about who made those decisions? But, he would have headed for his stringing machine, hoping all the while for a miracle.

He would have tried the 16-pound test line first. It was easy to evenly string the test racquet he had selected. But when he struck a ball, it nearly sliced the little green orb into pieces. By then, his wife, Mirka would have entered the picture and procured the strangely strung racquet for slicing hardboiled eggs to make uniquely cubed egg salad sandwiches. With those snacks, their four kids would have memories to share with their own children, someday. Who but a child of the father of an invention could have been so lucky?

A determined Roger would have moved on to another test case (or test racquet) then. He would next have tried the 40-pound test. The curly string would have been a clear example of over-kill, but he persevered. After it had seemed satisfactory, the excited Federer would have swiftly donned his outside clothing and ambled to the soggy court. In mere seconds, his racquet would have been immune to the wet, icy air. He would have swatted ball after ball toward his anxious opponent – the wall. Satisfied to having solved his pressing issues, at least for the day, he would have again dialed up his Spanish friend. The line would have crackled and a friendly voice would have answered, No?

Yes! Would surely have been Roger’s reply. The two friends would have marveled at their ability to think outside the box, even though the solution had been in the tackle box all along.

There will be tennis again, but along the way there should be memories of triumphs that rise above the challenges that these times engender. Existence can hinge on more than tennis, but the game will survive a pandemic with a lot of patience and ingenuity.


Continue Reading