Fabio Fognini of Italy failed to capitalize on a major opportunity to finally defeat his nemesis Pablo Carreno Busta of Spain in the first round of the Monte-Carlo Masters 1000.
MONTE-CARLO – On Easter Monday six seeded players took the court in Monte-Carlo and all emerged as winners. No. 9 seed Berdych prevailed over Kuztnesov, No. 12 Bautista Agut battled past Basilashvili, No. 13 Carreno Busta won a tough battle against Fognini, No. 12 Zverev dominated Seppi, No. 15 Ramos Vinolas had an easy task against Olivo and No. 16 Cuevas cruised past Troicki.
Fabio Fognini’s loss was a major disappointment for the very pro-Italian crowd that was cheering and supporting their countryman. Fabio, who experienced a breakthrough moment in his career by reaching the semifinals in Miami, was born in Arma di Taggia – a small Italian coast town located 30 minutes from the Monte-Carlo Country Club. Unfortunately the effort of his supporters was in vain.
When a player loses five matches in a row, it would be obvious to assume that the opponent is a better player and has a technical advantage that allows him to dominate their head-to-head.
On the other hand, by watching Fabio Fognini compete against the higher ranked Pablo Carreno Busta, it is very difficult to explain the dominance of the Spaniard over the Italian. Fabio is usually the better player throughout the match, but eventually loses the pivotal points.
Fognini is the type of player that often gives the impression that he is more talented than his competition, but at the end of the day his lack of consistency contributes to his demise. The illustrious Italian journalist Rino Tommasi used to say that each player should always remember to “hit the ball across the net once more than their opponent and eventually it might not come back anymore.”
The main reason why Fognini ended up losing today’s match is that his Spanish opposition was certainly more consistent and mentally tougher throughout the entire match. Fabio had moments of brilliance that were often overshadowed by his inconsistency.
Fabio had previously won only two sets in four matches against Carreno Busta, but today he quickly sprinted to a 4-2 lead and seemed on his way to owning the first set. When serving at 5-4, he committed a crucial double fault that ended up changing the entire momentum of the set. The double fault proved to be unnecessary. Fognini made the wrong decision of going for too much on his second serve despite the fact that Carreno Busta wasn’t applying pressure with his returns. By the end of the match, Fabio had committed a whopping 8 double faults.
“I was very unlucky in the most important moments of the match. I missed a couple of great shots by literally a millimeter or less and a key moment was decided by a net cord in my opponent’s favor,” Fognini said in his post-match press conference.
Fognini ended up losing the first set tie-breaker by 7 points to nothing, which unfortunately doesn’t leave much room for blaming his loss on bad luck.
Fabio found himself in a similar situation during the second set. He went up a break twice but failed to capitalize on his opportunities. Despite winning the second set tie-breaker and pushing the match to a third set, his return game dropped a level and ended up costing him the match. The decisive break occurred in the eighth game of the final set.
It was disappointing to see how Fognini accepted his defeat when he said: “I played well and I am very happy with my level of play.”
Fabio also explained that the reason for most of his mistakes was that “I was trying to play aggressive and charge the net. I felt confident with my net game.” That was the game plan decided with Franco Davin – his Argentinian coach.
Fognini lost a great opportunity to advance to at least the third round where his potential opponent would more than likely have been Novak Djokovic. Carreno Busta will now face the winner between Mahut and Kachanov for the honor of playing the No. 2 player in the world.
Djokovic headlines Tuesday’s action
Today’s matches will be more than interesting. The most anticipated encounter will be Novak Djokovic’s return to the tour against Gilles Simon – a player that the Serb has a 10-1 record against. Despite the one-sided head-to-head, their round of 16 match at the Australian Open last year was an absolute five set-thriller that lasted 4 hours and 48 minutes. It is also important to remember that last year Djokovic suffered a first round loss to Vesely in Monte-Carlo, which proved to be one of his rare defeats in the first six months of the year. After his long-awaited victory at Roland Garros, he experienced a major letdown in the second part of the season.
2017 has been a year to forget for Novak so far. Today’s match will be a big test because Simon is the type of player that will not hand the match over to Djokovic. Novak will have to step up to the plate and win it. Murray and Nadal will certainly keep an eye of this intriguing match-up.
(Article translation provided by T&L Global – Translation & Language Solutions – www.t-lglobal.com )
Modern Tennis: Evolution Of A Game
It’s a well-known fact that every single thing goes into renovation and re-shaping as we move on, sports are, certainly, included in this category that undergoes usually, from time to time, new adjustments and modifications that are probably attributed to two main reasons; to cope with the contemporary trend, particularly, among young people and other commercial aspects like promoting it to a broader population of fans. Tennis is one of a few sports that has retained most of its rules and traditions until the moment, however, introducing some little changes in the game could serve the sport better, make it more interesting for people got already bored of it, even more appealing for new audience, and most importantly more optimum and safer for the players.
We will get through some of the new technological and technical innovations that have been introduced into the Next Generation ATP Finals over the three editions of the tournament and expose its pros and cons.
The format of the tournament, since its emerging in 2017, has been quite different with the objective of attracting more fans by making matches quicker and have more exciting moments in less amount of time.
The most fundamental part of the new format has been the number of games per set, which became four games a set instead of 6 with a Tie-Break at 3-All, and No-Ad scoring. The shorter set has been compensated for with the matches being best-of-five sets so that a player needs to win 12 games to win a match. The introduction of such a new format has obviously increased the intensity of the matches by speeding up the pace of every rally, so that after every changeover you will definitely not witness more than 14 points thanks to the No-Ad scoring role, which means also more break points.
The No-Ad scoring role, similar to that in doubles competition in the standards ATP tour, means that when it’s tied at deuce (40-All), the next point is considered the deciding point and regarding serving either in the deuce or advantage courts, in 2018 edition it was the receiver’s choice, while in 2019 it’s up to the server player.
I think that these modifications on the traditional format have brought much dynamics and speed, as you can see that everything is pretty quick that needs the players to exert little physical efforts on each point which eventually helps them comply much easier to the shot clock and most probably that would impress a lots of fans amongst young ones, and would be appreciated as well by most people having a real busy schedule.
However, players have to adapt to this new format in terms of mental alertness and tactics, because everything is going very fast and if one player lost his concentration for a moment or two on his service game, with the No-Ad scoring rule, that could cost him the set which would ruin his whole match even with considering that it’s a best-of-five sets match.
The innovations, at the Next Generation ATP Finals, haven’t been only technical but also included new cutting-edge technological services that would not only help ease the calls on points but also give the players and their chosen coaches reliable data and physical measures about their own performance and workload after each match that would assist them on evaluating their plans and training strategies.
The usage of the very innovative Live Electronic Line Calling system has so many remarkable merits, as it really helps eliminating human’s errors, yet not absolutely eliminating errors as sometimes the machine doesn’t work in very rare cases, that’s why in close callings players have the right to watch a video review to get assured of the call. In addition, this contributes a lot to shorten the average time taken between points as the calls are usually clear and need no more evaluation from the umpire or the players. Another major advantage for such system installation is that now players don’t have to challenge calls they are having doubts over, for instance a player could’ve used all their challenges and they can no longer challenge the call despite having the call wrong, that would never be encountered with this innovative system.
The third edition of the Next Generation ATP Finals also features an unprecedented technology available on ATP, in which players are allowed to use wearable devices that would measure velocity and direction, acceleration and force, rotation, body orientation, and will quantify internal load (through heart rate). The data collected would be available after matches for the players and their coaches for further assessing the key elements of their game.
All these previous innovations and rule modifications cannot be seen, generally, to be compromising the core of the traditions of tennis, however, there is a one rule introduced at the Next Gen ATP Finals that shows a lot of controversy over if it’s affecting the core of the game or not, it’s the In-Match Player Coaching via head-sets. According to this rule, a player can communicate with his coach during a match at certain points, similar to what’s happening in the WTA, however the coaches aren’t permitted to come on court.
Some top players have had their say about that topic. While some backed the very new feature, others thought it doesn’t belong to the world of tennis.
“I’m not all for it, I find it kind of cool that in tennis, you know, you’re sort of on your own out there. Not everybody has the same amount of resources for coaching, as well. So I’m not sure if it’s that beneficial.” Argued 20-time Grand Slam Champion Roger Federer.
Federer’s long term rival Novak Djokovic had another thought about the In-Match Coaching, thinking that tennis should be like most of the other sports in this aspect of the game.
“When the WTA introduced on-court coaching, many ATP players were not really positive about it. I thought it was a good move for the sport. I mean, we’re probably one of the only, maybe [the] only global sport that doesn’t use coaching during the play. Even golf, individual sport, you have caddies that you communicate with throughout the entire course.” Said Djokovic.
One way of thinking is that tennis is based on playing individually in the first place, of course, players do put strategies and tactics with their coaching teams but when they get to the court, it’s all theirs, not only physically but also mentally, that’s why some players hire psychotherapist. On the other hand, some players might have some mental weaknesses and such an opportunity could deal with this problem during the match, and at the same time the other player would be offered the same opportunity so it’s fair after all.
I think people should keep watching closely this controversial very new rule being introduced to the world of tennis at the editions of the Next Gen ATP Finals and its effect on the players, then they can conclude whether it would affect the game in a positive or negative manner.
To conclude, every single sport has to keep up to date with the advancements taking place and the common tends, yet never to change its roots that it’s already been built upon. With most of the innovations that have been introduced to the Next Gen tournament, I think there is a great combination between cutting-edge technology represented on facilitate officiating and giving useful information for the players about their game, and optimizing some rules that wouldn’t necessarily compromise the origin of tennis.
Laver Cup: As Europe’s blue reign, myriad hues peek out in event’s latest iteration
The 2019 Laver Cup showed all over again why it was an opportunity for tennis to be diverse in its offering.
Twelve matches spread over a three-day weekend later, Laver Cup has modified the proverbial face and scope of men’s tennis. It is still viewed sceptically as a disruptor to routine, individual-focused tennis matches in certain pockets. Yet, the singularity it has brought into the midst of the prevalent concept of individuality is irrevocable.
In the third year of the event’s emergence, these aspects are repetitive. However, Laver Cup’s display re-lit the theme of a team before a player. It also elevated it to heights not seen in its previous two editions. This showed in the players’ camaraderie with each other. As it did in the numerous coaching tips that came from the bench from Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, and even Nick Kyrgios towards their fellow squad members.
Broadly, it was laid out in how the Laver Cup changed the subject from who would win the most Slams to which part of the globe would be victorious. For once, the conversation did not focus on 20 Slams versus 19, as it had come to be after Nadal’s win at the US Open. It was riveted on how two sportsmen with 39 Slams between them could set aside their competitiveness towards a common goal for a still-mushrooming tourney.
— Laver Cup (@LaverCup) September 22, 2019
“Winning (as) teams is just amazing because you celebrate together. It’s a very special thing. Honestly, I really hope that this new and young generation keeps supporting this event because this event is special,” Nadal said after Team Europe’s three-peat on Sunday. “We need to make this event stronger and stronger because the atmosphere that we leave here is difficult to find in other places.”
The 33-year-old’s statements, aside from setting aside any cynicism about his involvement in the event this year, emphasised the growth Laver Cup has had in its three years. Nadal’s participation in Laver Cup’s inaugural year was seen as a novelty, a continuation of his and Federer’s triumphant return to the Tour after an injury-troubled 2016. Novak Djokovic’s inclusion in Europe’s 2018 squad was viewed as a reiteration that the event was a fad, where top-ranked players would make a one-off appearance, before stepping away.
In 2019, the 12-time French Open champion’s return contradicted this previously-held supposition. This shifting of perceptions is why Laver Cup has turned problematic to the Tour’s other mainstay events.
If Laver Cup were to be regarded as merely an exhibition, a tournament with no relevance to how the ATP tour progressed year-on-year with its usual clanking schedule, all of the players’ emotiveness and reactions would have been on par with the idea of livening it up for its sake.
On the other hand, when two former world no. 1s were heard sternly telling their touted successor not to be negative for the rest of his match, it was hard to convince that the whole atmosphere was made-up.
Though, it does bear noting that not being put-on and the ease with which it has been assimilated in tennis’ mainstay have been the catalysts for Laver Cup’s disparaging mooting in certain circles.
The past weekend it coincided with a couple of ATP tournaments, in St. Petersburg and Metz. Both events had several interesting match-ups of their own. Followers deeply vested in the sport knew the happenings across all tournaments held last week. But for casual viewers, it would have come down to picking one event over the rest.
The factoring in of this unnecessary chasm added to the enervation around tennis by making one take sides in a sport that is already at crossroads, without Laver Cup even being mentioned.
Yet, if it were about inclusivity, selectivity in audiences’ preferences is the other side of tennis’ coin. These choices cannot always remain aligned, even in accepting or discarding the tri-day tournament as a consequential pursuit. As Nadal opined, when asked to compare between his other title wins and his Laver Cup team win, “…every single thing is different and is important by itself.”
Nothing Tops Star Power At U.S. Open
Charleston Post and Courier columnist James Beck reflects on this year’s US Open.
NEW YORK — Tennis is still all about who’s playing the game.
Parents watch their kids grow up through their junior tennis days. Then maybe college tennis.
But when it comes to watching big-time tennis such as at the U.S. Open, nothing tops star power. That was never more evident than Friday and Saturday in Arthur Ashe Stadium.
NEW YORK CROWD UNSURE ABOUT MEDVEDEV
Russia’s Daniil Medvedev is red hot this summer, first on the U.S. Open series where he lost in two finals before winning in Cincinnati. And then he made the U.S. Open final.
But the New York crowd doesn’t get very excited about the 6’6″ wonder. Empty seats were plentiful Friday afternoon when Medvedev knocked off Grigor Dimitrov in the first men’s semifinal. Even if the crowds weren’t excited about Medvedev, they should have been thrilled to see Dimitrov. Obviously, the fans weren’t too happy that Dimitrov had taken down Roger Federer in the quarterfinals.
But, suddenly, when Rafa Nadal took center court for the second semifinal, fans were everywhere. That was for a match against a relative newcomer to big-time tennis. Matteo Berrettini could play, but he was no equal for Nadal.
NADAL MAKES EMPTY SEATS DISAPPEAR
Yet, it was time to be sure you were in the correct seat. The empty seats had disappeared.
The U.S. Open had switched gears. It had gone from the frenzied atmosphere of young
Americans Coco Gaulf, Caty McNally and Taylor Townsend to a different reality.
The old-timers, better known as all-timers, might be nearing the end of the road in big-time tennis. Yes, the list includes even Serena Williams.
Nadal took care of his end of the bargain with the fans by turning away Berrettini in sraight sets to secure his day, and a spot in the final against Medvedev.
Serena couldn’t save her day in Saturday’s women’s final, despite the efforts of a packed stadium of wildly cheering supporters. Nineteen-year-old Canadian Bianca Andreescu simply was better on this day.
ANDREESCU MIGHT BE FOR REAL
Of course, Andreescu has plenty of time to set records and win fans. Serena rallied from 5-1 down in the second set, and appeared headed for another possible magical win when she tied the set at 5-5.
In the end, Serena failed again in her attempt to win a record-tying 24th Grand Slam title in a 6-3, 7-5 loss to Andreescu.
Serena might have made 2018 champion Naomi Osaka’s career a year earlier when Serena couldn’t notch Grand Slam title No. 24 then, either. Now, Andreescu may be ready to make her mark on the game. Getting by Serena was a big step. Andreescu might join the all-timers one day.
When another Grand Slam season gets underway in January in Australia, the tennis world really might be turned upside down. Novak Djokovic’s early departure along with the 38-year-old Federer’s and Stan Wawrinka’s losses in the next round were shocking, along with the early collapse of all of the super women’s stars except Serena.
SERENA, FEDERER AND NADAL IN A DIFFERENT WORLD
The young women’s stars such as Osaka, Sloane Stephens, Madison Keys, Simona Halep and Ashleigh Barty, along with Medvedev, Berrettini, Dominic Thiem, Stefanos Tsitsipas and Felix Auger-Aliassime among the men aren’t likely to evolve into all-time stars the way Serena, Federer and Nadal have.
That’s just the reality of big-time tennis. Serena, Federer and Nadal are players for the ages, just like Rod Laver was. Their fan bases are in for a major change, or they can switch to the sometimes unpredictability of this new group.
James Beck is the long-time tennis columnist for the Charleston (S.C.) Post and Courier newspaper. He can be reached at Jamesbecktennis@gmail.com. See his Post and Courier columns at
Summer Success Comes At A Cost For Daniil Mdvedev In London
Stefanos Tsitsipas Edges Medvedev To Clinch Historic Win At ATP Finals
Davis Cup: Croatia Replaces Captain Just Days Before The Finals
ATP Finals 2019 Day 2 Preview: Rafael Nadal Begins Hunt For Elusive Title
(VIDEO) Thiem Shocks Federer on Opening Day at the 2019 Nitto ATP Finals
Three Things To Know About Rafael Nadal’s Wedding
Former Top 10 Star Was Drunk During Grand Slam Final, Claims Banned Tennis Player
Former Russian Tennis Star Turned Coach Alexander Volkov Dead At 52
Novak Djokovic And Rafael Nadal To Hold ‘Masterclass’ During Kazakhstan Exhibition
Rafael Nadal In Good Shape Ahead Of Bid For Elusive Paris Title, Says Coach
(VIDEO) Roger Federer, Alexander Zverev Guide Europe To Laver Cup Glory
(VIDEO) US Open Day 14: Rafael Nadal Ends The Tournament With An Extraordinary Win
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Bianca Andreescu Is The Queen Of New York
(VIDEO) US Open Day 12: Daniil Medvedev Stands In The Way Of Nadal’s 19th Grand Slam Title
(VIDEO) US Open Day 11: Why Bianca Andreescu Toppling Williams Will Not Be A Shock
ATP3 days ago
Jannik Sinner reaches the final in Milan with win over Miomir Kecmanovic to the delight of Italian fans
Editorial3 days ago
Modern Tennis: Evolution Of A Game
ATP2 days ago
Novak Djokovic Ready For World Number One Battle With Rafael Nadal In London
ATP2 days ago
Jannik Sinner: “I wanted to give a present for my coach’s birthday”
ATP3 days ago
Alex De Minaur reaches his second consecutive final in Milan
Fed Cup2 days ago
Ash Barty And Kristina Mladenovic Power To Victory On Day One At Fed Cup Final
ATP1 day ago
ATP Finals 2019 Day 1 Preview: Djokovic, Federer To Kick-Off Year-End Extravaganza
ATP1 day ago
Jannik Sinner: “Milan is a lucky venue”