EXCLUSIVE: Mental Illness on the Main Stage of Tennis - Frederico Gil's Story - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

Editorial

EXCLUSIVE: Mental Illness on the Main Stage of Tennis – Frederico Gil’s Story

Published

on

Frederico Gil of Portuga returns a shot during his first round match against Marcos Baghdatis of Cyprus on day two of the AEGON Championships at Queens Club on June 12, 2012 in London, England. (image via zimbio.com)

 

Playing tennis around the world for 90 per cent of the year is physically demanding for players on the ATP and WTA Tour. To become the best in the world, player’s sacrifice their personal lives, delay family commitments and spend the majority of the year living in hotels. The reward is potentially massive in terms of prize money and endorsements. On the other hand, the demanding requirements of the sport can take its toll on a players emotional wellbeing and sometimes it can get too much, even for some professionals.

One player who has experienced these issues was Portugal’s Frederico Gil. Gil achieved a career ranking best of 62 in the world in 2011 and reached the quarterfinals of the 2011 Monte Carlo Masters as a qualifier. He has so far reached one ATP final which was at the 2010 Portugal Open. The achievements of Gil are what many players on the Futures tour envy, but in 2013 at a low-point in his life, he decided to take a break from tennis. Ubitennis spoke with Gil about the lead-up to his decision to temporarily leave the sport.

I decided to take a pause in my career because I was not feeling happy anymore. I was feeling a little bit depressed. I was feeling a little bit tired about tennis and my personal life, so I decided to make a stop”. The Portuguese player said.

In the lead up to the break, Gil said that he wanted a greater personal life after enduring a long period on the tour in high intensity. There were high expectations for Gil after he achieved a series of firsts for Portuguese tennis. In 2010 he became the first Portuguese player in history to reach an ATP final and in 2012 he was the first to reach the third round of a Grand Slam. The high standards set by Gil started to take a toll on him.

Shortly after the start of his 7-month break from the tour it was revealed that he took time out to treat his mental illness. The medicine he was taking in 2013 wasn’t working for him as he sought help. Gil suffers from Bipolar Personality Disorder. Bipolar disorder is a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression. According to Portuguese media reports, he first started to develop the symptoms in his early 20’s and said it is a genetic condition.

During the break, Gil said that he received ‘a low level of” support from the ATP as they sent him a book and a letter of support. He stated that the majority of the support came from outside the tennis world.

“They (The ATP) sent me a card and they sent me a book to wish me all the best”. He said.
“The support was very low. The supporters were my friends, family and girlfriend. From the international federation I received low support”. He added.

Despite openly admitting that he received little help from the tennis federation, Gil is unconvinced that they could have supported him better.

“I don’t know if they could support me better, they didn’t have to do more than they did. The ATP is doing their job. Their focus is on the ATP tour, not me”.

He returned to the tour in February 2014 and has claimed two Futures titles in his home country (one in 2014 and one in 2015). In addition, he has also won seven doubles titles on the Futures circuit. Two years after his break, the 30-year-old still copes with his Bipolar disorder, but remains committed to the sport he loves.

Sometimes I feel like I have a lot of stability, I feel like I can be really perfect. Some other moments I feel that it is very difficult to continue and I doubt if I should continue or not. Sometimes I can’t sometimes I can, but it’s ok because for me its normal”. Gil said.

“Sometimes I get very tired and disappointed because I feel nothing from persons around me, I feel alone and sad, but I continue because there are moments where I feel great and I am living my life, working towards my dream”.

The discussion of mental illness in tennis has been a rarely spoken about topic. Recently the issue was highlighted after Mardy Fish talked openly about his anxiety disorder. Studies estimate that one in four people will experience some form of mental illness, whether it is minor or extreme. This could potentially mean that there could be many more on the tennis tour experiencing these problems. The reasons for there not being many more stories from the tour could be due to the stigma still surrounding mental health issues.

Concerning any other player on the tour who may be suffering from similar issues to him, Gil told Ubitennis that the key for all players on the tour is ‘happiness‘. Gil said that a player needs to be a person and be happy with what they do.

The secret, it is very intense due to the high pressure of tennis, it is very important to calibrate all areas of your life and be happy with everything you do’.

Gil is currently ranked 435th in the world. He will play in a Challenger tournament in Casablanca next week, followed by 4-5 Challenger tournaments in South America. The 30-year-old told Ubitennis that he hopes to reach the top 300 by the end of the year so that he can participate in the Australian Open qualifying tournament in January. The Portuguese player also revealed his desire to finally achieve the goal which he has had since he was a child.

My main goal is the top 50, as a kid, my main goal was the top 50 and i never reached it at 62. I would like to achieve top 50 in singles and the top 100 in doubles”. He told us.

The story of Frederico Gil’s personal struggles is one that isn’t often brought to the limelight. The collaboration between UbiTennis and Frederico Gil was done to mark World Mental Health day. It is hoped that Frederico’s story will be help other player’s experiencing a similar situation.

Editorial

A new documentary, and the rekindling of Serena Williams’ tryst with 2018 US Open destiny

Published

on

Serena Williams, 2019 US Open, Patrick Mouratoglou
Photo Credit: US Open/USTA

It’s almost a year since Serena Williams got embroiled in a war of words with chair umpire Carlos Ramos in the 2018 US Open final. The subject is yet to ebb entirely from memory though. The first episode of ESPN’s new documentary series Backstory – featured on the incident involving the 23-time Grand Slam champion – does its bit to ensure that on the eve of the 2019 US Open, attention is centred on what occurred a year ago.

 

Titled Serena vs the Umpire, the episode is an extrapolation of the match’s progression and what transpired within it. It presents facts through the pros and cons of Williams and Ramos’, and also of Patrick Mouratoglou’s actions that charted the match. Yet, in spite of this, the program makes Williams out as the wronged one.

First, by her coach, Mouratoglou, who displayed his commitment as a mentor by using hand signals to try and guide her. Then, by Ramos who penalised her for the Frenchman’s infraction. Without heeding her vehemence that she was not a party to her coach’s decision-making. The narrative of the program puts it out that regardless of Williams’ behaviour that saw her scream and rant at the umpire and call him a liar and thief, she did not deserve to be termed as the pariah of the match.

The program’s one-sided leaning does not change the problematic aspects of Williams’ and Mouratoglou’s behaviours. Williams, in protesting her innocence about receiving (and accepting) coaching, did cross the line with her aggressiveness. There was – and is – no denying her disrespect towards the authority on the chair officiating the match. And, rationales like the momentousness of the occasion getting to her do not justify her stance at all. Rather, they hinted at her being ill-equipped to handle the scenario in what turned out be the proverbial repeating of history, at the same tournament.

Mouratoglou’s near-immediate (after the end of the match) admission that he tried to help her – and his maintaining to do so, even now – also debilitates Williams’ position. The 49-year-old’s statements about what he thought was Ramos’ inability in letting the match spiral out of bands, is a bemusing segue as well.

“Ramos’ job is also to keep the match under control. He totally lost control of the match, completely, because he reacted with emotions. And he’s not supposed to — he’s a chair umpire, he’s not a player,” Mouratoglou said. Ironically, had Ramos lashed out emotionally instead of abiding the rules, the repercussions would have been far serious for Williams for name-calling him and for continuously challenging his authority.

Mouratoglou’s comments are revealing of how the program does not consider the ramifications of that fracas for Ramos.

Since the International Tennis Federation’s (ITF) rules do not permit Ramos from speaking to the media – including to ESPN for this program – the 48-year-old has been short-changed as he cannot present his point-of-view countering the acclaimed coach. Also, in the year that has almost gone by, the veteran official’s on-court calls have been scrutinised and compared with his umpiring of that match. Moreover, Ramos will not be umpiring any of Williams’ matches at Flushing Meadows in 2019. All of these are indicative of how Ramos’ professionalism has been denigrated.

Players have the right to request to not have certain umpires officiate their matches and many have done so for reasons of their own. The avoidance of the tension between such a player and umpire is undeniably a positive to come out of the move. Yet, what does it leave the umpire with, since, irrespective of how a player behaves with the official, the latter does not have the same means to put forth his officiating preference.

Speaking of preferences, proffering his concluding thoughts on the match, Mouratoglou opined, “It was horrible for us. It was horrible for Serena. It’s fantastic for tennis. It was unbelievable, that was the best moment in tennis of the past 10 years. Tennis was everywhere. You don’t have any drama in tennis. We have drama in all the other sports, but not tennis. People should be allowed to be herself and show emotion. You want passion, that’s why people watch sport. They want things to happen. They want to feel emotion, they want to root for someone, they want to be shocked, they want to be happy, they want to be sad. That’s what they want and everybody felt something that day.”

Indeed, the match prompted reactions from everybody who watched it. Nonetheless, its proceedings overshadowed the game of tennis so much so that the bigger picture was not that of the sport but that of egoism.

Continue Reading

ATP

Intriguing Team-Ups Lure Eyes Doubles’ Way. Will They Stay For The Problems, Too?

Will the recent surge in high-profile double partnerships have any impact on the long term future of the discipline?

Published

on

Cincinnati Open, Western and Southern Open, Andy Murray, Feliciano Lopez
Photo Credit: ATP Tour Twitter

In one of his press conferences at the Western and Southern Open in Cincinnati, Andy Murray said he would not be playing the US Open. His announcement came a day or so after his initial declaration that he would be playing only the two doubles events in the final Major of the season. A few things came out of Murray’s remarks. The first and the obvious was that the former world no. 1 was ready to give it his all (yet again) to play singles. The second, the understated aspect, was that doubles while seeming easy vis-à-vis singles required just as much focus, if not more. Then, there was a third.

 

In tennis’ continuity though, the relevance of the doubles game is not a recent epiphany. However, the last few tournaments of the 2019 season that featured some eclectic partnerships – Stefanos Tsitispas and Nick Kyrgios, Andy Murray and Feliciano Lopez, the Pliskova twins, Andy and Jamie Murray, and so on – has made doubles slightly more prominent than singles.

Singles has become monotonous with the same set of players making it to the final rounds. On the other hand, doubles has brought in more verve to the existing status quo of the Tour, with each player’s individuality adding to the dynamics of the team. After his first outing as Kyrgios’ doubles partner at the Citi Open in Washington in July, Tsitsipas pointed this out.

“It’s the joy of being with a person who thinks differently and reacts differently. I would characterise him (Kyrgios) as someone who likes to amuse. I’m very serious and concentrated when I play, but he just has the style of speaking all the time. It’s good sometimes to have a change,” the Greek had said.

These changes – as seen with Murray’s recent decision – may not extend for a longer period. The culmination of these short-term team-ups does – and should – not mean the end of the road of doubles piquing attention, per se. At the same time, these transitory partnerships also reroute the discussion back to the financial side of the doubles game.

In a recent interview with Forbes, Jamie Murray – a doubles specialist – shared how conducive it had become for players to take up doubles as the sole means of a tennis career these days, as compared to in the past.

“Because the money is always increasing in tennis, it is a much more viable option to go down the doubles route a lot earlier than previous generations. Before, people would play singles and then when their ranking dropped, they played an extra few years of doubles. Now it is a genuine option to start off much younger and have a career in doubles,” the 33-year-old said.

Despite Murray’s upbeat attitude, these increases have not exactly trickled towards doubles, especially at the Slams including the upcoming edition of the US Open. For 2019, the USTA showed-off yet another hike in the prize-money coffer. The men’s and women’s singles champions will be awarded $3.8 million. In comparison, the men’s and women’s doubles teams winning the respective title will get $740,000. This sum gets further diluted for the mixed-doubles’ titlists who will get $160,000 as a team.

This is the third and final takeaway that emerged from Murray’s US Open call. For several of these singles players, intermittent doubles play is an option. For those who play only doubles, that is the only option they have. The doubles game requires similar effort – travel, expenses and fitness – the costs continue to outweigh the benefits. These momentary team formations are a gauge revealing the disparity of tennis’ two sides, visible yet obliviated beyond tokenism.

Continue Reading

ATP

Andy Murray, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic’s Big Four reunion in Cincy

Published

on

ATP Cincinnati, Andy Murray, Western and Southern Open
Photo Credit: Western and Southern Open Twitter

A few years before, there existed a quartet called Big Four in men’s tennis. At certain points in their time-line of dominance, injuries plagued each member of this four-member group. However, the severity of their affliction in one player, Andy Murray, saw his name erased from this elite pocket. Thus, the Big Four was reduced to the Big Three with Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer making up the troika.

 

At the 2019 Western and Southern Open in Cincinnati, three of the erstwhile Big Four troupe reunited as they re-entered the circuit’s circus. And each player had a different path leading up to the event, too, underlining how divergent their careers had become despite overlapping scheduling.

The 2016 season was the common catalyst leading to this divergence. From Federer’s injury to him pausing his season to focus on rehab after Wimbledon, to Djokovic pushing his boundary as a marauder and completing the non-calendar Slam, and to Murray ending the season as the world no. 1. The year in consideration also threw up other names – Nadal’s season ended in an agony of injury, while Stan Wawrinka won his third Major at the US Open. In its bounty of giving and taking, 2016 changed how we looked at these players – especially the first four – and the irrevocability of assumption that these guys could get past any hurdles stopping their way.

Juxtaposing with Cincinnati, in the three years since 2016, Federer and Djokovic have vaulted past their share of physical problems. Yet, in the Ohioan city, they have different motivations guiding them. This is the first time that Djokovic has entered the Cincinnati draw as the defending champion. Meanwhile, after having been drawn in the same half as the Serbian, Federer has the proverbial score to settle against him. “I can’t wait for my next rematch with Novak or my next time I can step on a match court and show what I can do,” the 20-time Slam champion said in one of his pre-tournament media interactions in Cincinnati.

There are a few opponents to get past before their slated semi-final meeting occurs. Nonetheless, their sustained competitiveness adds its fervour to the already-hefty top-half of the men’s draw. In the midst of their respectively successful opening rounds, Murray’s first-round defeat to Richard Gasquet in straight sets became a contextual misnomer for comebacks.

Yet, Murray’s was the most stirring return. This was not because of the emotional crossroads that had sprung up at the 2019 Australian Open regarding his retirement. But on account of how farther Murray had leapt to put his physical frailties behind and re-join the singles Tour. And, the Briton’s determination to do so is reminiscent of 2016, all over again. It’s the completion of the circle of how Murray had pushed hard to become the world’s best player and now, he is trying just as much to regain his footing back.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending