TENNIS 2014 ROLAND GARROS – 3rd of June. M. Sharapova d. G. Muguruza 1-6, 7-5, 6-1. An interview with Maria Sharapova
Q. You did it again. But what did you think after that first set loss?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: Well, a few things. I thought I didn’t do much in the first set to hurt her. She was doing many things well.
I also knew that the match wasn’t over. I still had a fair bit of time to change things around. You know, little by little I started playing a bit better, started getting in the court a little bit more, playing a little bit more aggressive, serving better than I did in the first set, returning as well, giving myself more looks at break points.
So just a combination of a few things. It was tough not to win that game at 3 1. I think that would have gave me a bit more confidence. I was a game away from losing it. I was very happy with the way I came through.
Q. It can look different from the outside than how you guys are playing it, but where did that match turn for you? Where do you think?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: It’s tough to say on this one. I mean, the first set I just didn’t feel like I was giving myself a chance to play out there. We didn’t have many long rallies. It was just two or three ball rallies, and I was late.
I mean, she was playing very aggressive and hitting shots very deep. I just didn’t have much to say to that in the first set.
I think as I started returning better and also serving, I mean, getting first serves in, against an opponent like that who is playing with so much confidence, you can’t just keep giving them looks at second serves all the time. It’s just not going to help you in the quarterfinal of a Grand Slam.
As easy as that sounds, it’s much tougher to do that in that situation. I was able to do that. Once I got those break points, once I got the break, even thought she broke back, I started feeling like I was in the match again.
Q. 5 All in the second she goes up 30 Love, and then you reel off two unreturnables and a winner to break there. It seemed like things really, really turned there. Were you aware of that being a particularly important point in the match? What was going on?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: I think there are a lot of important points. I could say the same things about the forehand that I missed at break point, 3 1, 30 40, and it’s a big point. If I lost that match, I would be kicking myself in the bottom for that point.
But of course when your opponent is up 30 Love and you get that game back, you know, 30 Love on serve when she’s serving quite well, I’m sure she feels like she has a good chance of getting that game in the bag, and all of a sudden I’m serving for the set.
Q. When Garbine beat Serena, she did it quickly; I think in a little over an hour. Match started off quickly for you losing the first set. What were you doing to slow it down and change the pace where you could get a foothold and stop her momentum? How much of that is actually slowing down the match and taking more time between the points to gather yourself?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: Well, apparently it’s not, because then you get a warning (smiling).
I think for me it was about a lot of the games in the first set she was always up 30 Love, 40 Love, and then I’d win a point or two. Then she’s the one with the confidence. You never are giving her a chance to think.
In the second set, when you’re making her, you know, hit a second ball after her serve or when you’re being a bit more aggressive on the second serves, taking a bit more chances, all of a sudden, you know, she’s not hitting so freely.
I think that changes a little bit. But it’s a combination of the way you feel and also that little pressure that she begins to feel.
Q. Judy Murray just tweeted Sharapova is like a tea bag…
MARIA SHARAPOVA: Who is that?
Q. Judy Murray. Andy’s mom.
MARIA SHARAPOVA: Okay. Sorry. I didn’t know who Judy Murray is.
Q. I will quote: Sharapova is like a tea bag. Put her into hot water, and you’ll find out how strong she is. People usually call you a fighter. How about being a tea bag?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: Can you explain that to me?
Q. You don’t drink tea?
MARIA SHARAPOVA: I love tea.
Q. Put the bag in hot water…
MARIA SHARAPOVA: I’m a big tea drinker. I don’t understand what she means.
Q. Hot water. In hot water. Water gets…
MARIA SHARAPOVA: That’s great. She’s very creative (smiling). I guess she could have put it many different ways, and she chose the English version.
Q. How about it? Fighter and tea bag? You can’t relate…
MARIA SHARAPOVA: I think it’s better to ask her than me. Obviously she has a better sense of what’s going on out there (smiling).
“We Hope to Convince Federer to Play”: the Presentation of the 2022 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters
Director Zeljko Franulovic talked about next year’s tournament, scheduled from April 9-17
The 2022 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters will take place from April 9-17, so it’s difficult to guess what the pandemic situation will be in six months. At the moment, however, the prevalent hypothesis is that all spectators will need a Covid Pass or to bring proof of a negative test before being allowed in the Montecarlo Country Club at Roquebrune, France. If some players will refuse the vaccine, then they will need to be tested regularly in accordance to the rules devised by the French government.
Other than that, there will be no surprises when it comes to the event’s logistics, since the Country Club has already added a new players lounge and a new press room in the past few years. In 2020 the tournament was cancelled, while in 2021 it took place behind closed doors (while still being televised in 113 countries); the last edition staged with a crowd, in 2019, sold 130,000 tickets, constituting 30% of the total revenue – another 30% came from the sponsors, 30% from media rights (a number that tournament director Zeljko Franulovic hopes to see increase) and 10% from merchandising.
While it’s early days to know whether the tournament will operate at full capacity, Franulovic has made it clear that the organisers are already planning to provide a better covering for the No.2 Court, whose roof has not been at all effective in the past in the event of rain.
The tournament’s tickets can be bought on the official website of the event, but Franulovic has already vowed to reimburse immediately every ticket “if the government and the health authorities should decide to reduce the tournament’s capacity.”
Ticket prices have increased by 2 to 3 percent as compared to 2019, ranging from £25-50 for the qualifiers weekend, £32-75 for the opening rounds, £…-130 for the quarterfinals and semifinals, £65-150 for the final, £360-1250 for a nine-day tickets. Franulovic claims that the prices are in line with those of the other Masters 1000 tournaments.
Finally, Franulovic supports Andrea Gaudenzi’s decision to create a fixed prize money for the next decade. While tournaments like Madrid and Rome are trying to increase their duration from 8 to 12 days, the Monte-Carlo director has claimed that he prefers to remain a week-long event, especially because his is not a combined tournament. As for the players who will feature, Franulovic hopes to convince Roger Federer to participate: “I’m certain that he will give everything he has to be able to stage another comeback on the tour, ma no one knows where he’ll play. However, I think that on the clay he should opt for best-of-three events like Monte-Carlo and Rome rather than the French Open.”
For this and more information, you can watch the video above.
EXCLUSIVE: How The ATP Plans To Make The Tour More Welcoming For LGBT Players
The governing body of men’s tennis has received praise for taking a proactive approach to the topic with the help of a leading LGBTQ+ organisation and a top research university.
During the first week of the US Open, there was an abundance of rainbow-theme flags and wristbands worn by both players and fans to mark the tournament’s first-ever Open Pride Day.
The event was part of the USTA’s Diversity and Inclusion strategic platform which aims to make tennis more inclusive. Unlike the women’s game, there are no openly LGBTQ+ players on the men’s Tour and there have been few historically, even though various players have spoken of their support for anybody on the Tour who decides to come out. Including Stefanos Tsitsipas and newly crowned US Open champion Daniil Medvedev, who were questioned about the topic following their second round matches. Meanwhile, Canada’s Felix Auger-Aliassime revealed that there is an ongoing survey related to LGBTQ+ issues being conducted by the ATP.
“Recently I’ve started doing a survey inside the ATP about the LGBTQ+ community,” he said. “It’s important these days to be aware of that and to be open-minded and the ATP needs to do that, in today’s time it’s needed.
“The reason we don’t have openly gay players on the ATP Tour, I’m not sure of the reason, but I feel me, as a player, it would be very open, very welcome. Statistically, there should be some, but for now there’s not.”
In response to Auger-Aliassime’s comment, UbiTennis looked into the work currently being done by the ATP alongside two other parties. Their decision to venture into LGBTQ+ representation on the Tour is part of their recent commitment to support the mental health and wellbeing of their players and staff. Last year, in May, they formed partnerships with Headspace and Sporting Chance.
The survey currently being conducted by the ATP started after the governing body of men’s tennis reached out to Lou Englefield, the director of Pride Sports, a UK organisation that focuses on LGBTQ+phobia in sport and aims to improve access to sport for all LGBTQ+ people. Through their connection, they contacted Eric Denison, a behavioural science researcher at Monash University’s School of Social Sciences. Denison was the lead author of the Out on the Fields study, the first international study on homophobia in sport and the largest conducted to date.
“I have been personally impressed with the initiative of the ATP and their desire to find ways to mitigate the broad impact of homophobic behaviour (in particular), not only on gay people, but on all players.” He told UbiTennis during an email exchange.
“We know of no other sporting governing body in the world that has been proactive on LGBTQ+ issues, and has taken a strong focus on engaging with both the LGBTQ+ community and scientists to find solutions.”
Denison says the norm has been for sports bodies to address this issue after they have been either pressured to do so or if the LGBTQ+ community got the ball rolling themselves. Incredibly, research conducted as part of the Out On The Fields initiative documented 30 separate studies which found sports organisations ignored discrimination experienced by LGBTQ+ people in sport.
Monash University has supplied the ATP with a series of scientifically validated questions, which they are using to ‘look under the hood’ at the factors which supports a culture where gay or bisexual players feel they are not welcome. The methodology is similar to a study Denison conducted in 2020 that focused specifically on the team sports rugby union and ice hockey.
“We suspect that tennis isn’t inherently more homophobic than other sports, or traditionally male settings. Instead, there is a disconnect between people’s attitudes towards gay people (e.g. the recent pro-gay comments by top players) and their behaviour, specifically their use of homophobic banter and jokes,” said Denison.
“This behaviour, which is largely habitual, creates a hostile climate for young gay/bi people who drop out or hide their sexuality. This means gay/bi players are invisible in youth tennis and leads to the downstream problem of no professionals. The banter/jokes continue because people think it is harmless.”
The hope is that players will also agree to be interviewed by the researchers for them to get a better understanding. All of the results will then be used by Pride Sports and Monash University to recommend evidence-based solutions. It is unclear as to how long the study will take or when the findings will be ready.
Former top 100 player Brian Vahaly is one of the few players to have been both openly gay and played at the highest level of the men’s game. However, he didn’t fully come to terms with his sexuality until after retiring from the sport at age 27. Speaking to UbiTennis earlier this year, Vahaly shed light on the potential barriers for gay players.
“There were a lot of homophobic jokes made on Tour. It’s a very masculine and competitive environment,” he said. “You don’t see a lot of gay representation, except for the women’s Tour. With me not having the personality of an outspoken advocate (for LGBTQ+ issues), certainly not in my twenties, I needed some time to understand myself. To me, in tennis I didn’t feel like there was anybody to talk to or anybody that was going through anything similar.”
The ATP has spoken with Vahaly about their initiative and he has become ‘quite involved.’ Through their discussions, he got acquainted with Denison for the first time. As a professional, Vahaly peaked at a ranking high of 64th in the world and won five Challenger titles. After retiring from the Tour, he has served on the USTA’s board of directors since 2013.
“I am happy to hear that the ATP is finally taking action to address this issue. I’m impressed they are taking a thoughtful, data-driven approach to make a meaningful difference here,” he told UbiTennis.
The ATP aims to make the men’s Tour more welcoming to potential LGTBQ+ athletes playing either now or in the future. For those who question if such an initiative is important in 2021, you only have to look at the younger demographic.
Sportsnet quoted CDC data from 2019 which showed that 26% of American LGBTQ+ teenagers aged 16 or 17 has contemplated suicide, five times more than those who identify as straight (5%). Among those teenagers who heard homophobic terms, 33% self-harmed and an additional 40% considered doing so.
More than 2000 players around the world currently have an ATP ranking.
2020 Tokyo Olympics, Djokovic on the heat and the new scheduling: “I’m glad they listened to us”
Speaking to Ubitennis, the world number one describes the work that he, Medvedev and Zverev (among others) have done to obtain better playing conditions
So far, the tennis tournament at the 2020 Olympics has made headlines less for the match-play than for the difficult conditions in which it has been taking place due to the heat and the humidity. In the women’s draw, for instance, four players have been forced to retire during their matches: the last one has been particularly shocking, as Paula Badosa was taken off-court on a wheelchair after collapsing late in the first set of her quarter-final match against Marketa Vondrousova. Luckily, these issues appear to have finally caught the attention of the International Tennis Federation: starting tomorrow, no match will be played before 3pm (7am in the UK).
Part of the credit for this (still belated) decision goes to the lobbying and the complaints of the players, as world N.1 Novak Djokovic explained while speaking to Ubitennis CEO Ubaldo Scanagatta in Tokyo: “I’m glad the decision was made to reschedule tomorrow’s opening matches at 3pm. Today we went to speak to the supervisor – when I say ‘we’ I mean myself, Medvedev, and Zverev, along with the team captains. I have spoken to Khachanov and Carreno Busta as well, so the majority of the players who will feature in the quarter finals was of the same opinion.
“Of course I would have wished for this decision to be made a few days ago, but it’s still a good thing,” he added. “Nobody wants to witness incidents like the one that occurred to Badosa.
“The conditions are really brutal. Some people might think that we are just complaining, but all resistance sports (and tennis should be included among them) are taking place later in the day because the combination between the heat and the humidity is really terrible.”
He then concluded: “I’ve been a professional tennis player for almost 20 years and I’ve never experienced such hard conditions for so many consecutive days. It may have have happened once or twice in Miami or New York, but just for one day, whereas in Tokyo the situation is like this every day. I think that this decision will benefit the fans as well, because playing later allows us to play our best – these conditions were just draining for us.”
Article by Lorenzo Colle; translated by Tommaso Villa
Andrey Rublev moves past Ilya Ivashka to reach the quarter finals in St. Petersburg
Matteo Berrettini rallies from one set down to beat Nikoloz Basilashvili in Vienna
Denis Shapovalov Battles Back To Reach The Quarterfinals In St Petersburg
Former World No.8 And Grand Slam Champion Jurgen Melzer Retires
Carlos Alcaraz Gets Revenge On Andy Murray To Reach Vienna Last Eight
REPORT: Unvaccinated Players Set To Be Banned From Playing Australian Open
Novak Djokovic Undecided Over Playing Australian Open, Slams Speculation Over His Vaccination Status
The 2021 Indian Wells Women’s Draw In Full
‘I Don’t Want To Be Part Of The Silence’ – Sportscaster Mary Carillo On Why She Boycotted The Laver Cup
Unvaccinated Players Could Be Allowed To Play Australian Open
US Open, Steve Flink: “Djokovic’s loss had more to do with fatigue than pressure”
US Open, Steve Flink on the Murray-Tsitsipas Controversy
(VIDEO) Dominic Thiem, Juan Martin Del Potro Gathering Momentum In Comeback Bids
Steve Flink On Wimbledon: “Bautista Agut would be a tough semifinal test for Djokovic”
Wimbledon, Flink: “Djokovic Will Beat Zverev in the Final”
Hot Topics3 days ago
Simona Halep On Raducanu, Romania and The COVID-19 Vaccine
ATP2 days ago
Felix Auger Aliassime eases past Berankis in Vienna
Latest news3 days ago
Elina Svitolina Splits With Coach After Five Years
Hot Topics2 days ago
Novak Djokovic Leads Quartet Of To 10 Players Set To Play Davis Cup Finals
Davis Cup3 days ago
Gael Monfils Omitted From French Davis Cup Squad But May Still Play
Latest news3 days ago
Qualifier Anastasia Gasanova shocks Teichmann in Cluj-Napoca
Focus2 days ago
Anett Kontaveitt arrives in Cluj looking to qualify for WTA Finals
Hot Topics3 days ago
Leaked WTA Email Suggests Unvaccinated Players Will Be Allowed To Play Australian Open